how old can this bitch be?
 

http://www.girlgirlkiss.com/tgpsubmi...ne5/bunny.html

??

18 or not that's fucking pushing it. Wow.

i'd say anywhere between 17-25...

put anyone in those clothes and pigtails, and they'll look young.

Pretty borderline shit...:eek7

Their site isn't 2257 compliant, I'd so not want to be them considering they're in the US.

Shes well over 18.

She looks young but is prob on the 18 borderline age...

Masssive boobs btw

I'd hit it.

Are you retarded? First if you have a question about a models age you could check to find http://www.pattycakeonline.com/2257.shtml then you could look and see both ccbill and visa process for it so obviously she is over 18.
Finally you could pull your head from your ass, she's in her 20's now and been online for years so get a clue.

nah, nothing wrong with a young looking model if she's legal age :thumbsup

although making them look younger with pigtails, schoolgirl uniforms, etc... might be pushing it a little.

yep.

id guess shes old enough to drink, so that puts her old enough than most of GFY

:1orglaugh

Thats why they are processing with ccbill :eek7

How is it borderline? i know alot of girls that look younger than their age... just means they age better.

Not too up on laws are we? It doesn't matter if she's 45, if she's in pigtails and a schoolgirl outfit, nude photos could be ruled kiddie porn. It's all interpritation and it's a very grey area.

judging by her boobs id say 21.

but seriously, a lot of girls can look real young if they want to.

looks over 18 to me.... look at the face and the tits...

2257 info showing a PO BOX?

http://www.pattycakeonline.com/previ...es/sample5.JPG


21 :2 cents:

Refer to Jact's 2nd post.

Not too bright are you, she is NOT NUDE! Also there is no implied sex in the site, duh

She looks like 12! Baby face! :thumbsup

she looks legal. i think it is just the pigtails and setting that make her look so young.

pass her this way

wow:Graucho

#1 - The 2257 info on the site does not prove she's over 18.
#2 - The fact that CCBill processes for the site does not mean she's over 18.

CCBill has processed for many underage non-nude sites.

Judging by her body, she looks to be legal, but she looks like a 12 year old in this pic:

http://www.girlgirlkiss.com/tgpsubmi...allery1/01.jpg

looks on 17-20

she's hot i had a girl that looked like her almost

Maybe in the past, i bet you'll have a hard time finding any site under 18 that they process for NOW.

At any rate this model is way over 18 I'm not going to tell you idiots again.

She does look older on her tour though:

http://www.pattycakeonline.com/previ.../sample5.shtml
http://www.pattycakeonline.com/previ...s/sample13.JPG

Hey guys, I am Patty's webmaster. I assure you she is legal -- and has been over 18 the 3+ years her site has been open. CCBill will back me up on this, since they have her ID on file as proof.

Good now get me a date with her. :thumbsup

You think they're going to consider some of the articles of clothing she's nearly wearing in some of the tour photos to be enough to stop an investigation if they wanted to raid them? Come on, there's no reason to press the limits on shit like this. It can only mean bad things for everyone.

See. Told ya she's 21.

Older than most here on the board.

AYB - I bet you gain some affiliates from this thread.



:thumbsup

Uh yea they'll surely "raid" her because one of her sets she is wearing a uniform? :1orglaugh Jesus man get a life, the girl is legal just not a used up crack whore like your used to i guess.

An investigation on friggin what?

An 18+ non nude model because here pigtails make her look younger?

You might want to update your 2257 info as it's inaccurate.

That would be good:)

If anyone DOES want to promote her site, here is the sign up link:
http://www.pattycakeonline.com/webmasters.shtml

I'm reworking that now, and we do have it set at 60% revshares, even though it says 50%.

Also you can get some older hosted galleries here:
http://www.pattycakeonline.com/tgp/partnerpage.php

Working on new hosted galleries right now, too:)

How so?

:1orglaugh almost as funny as The Heron's bullshit.

You can't be serious?

20 minutes over the age of 18.

I have posted NO bullshit dude. You might want to check your brain it seems to be malfunctioning...

If she didn't have tits ,I would swear she was 14

Nice.

I do hosted galleries. You dont post much, but nice to meet you. :)

http://tour1.nakedcollegegirls.tv/ga...il/index2.html
http://tour1.nakedcollegegirls.tv/ga...na/index2.html
http://tour1.nakedcollegegirls.tv/ga...ur/index2.html
http://tour1.nakedcollegegirls.tv/ga...le/index2.html
http://tour1.nakedcollegegirls.tv/ga...th/index2.html
http://tour1.nakedcollegegirls.tv/ga...ra/index2.html
http://tour1.nakedcollegegirls.tv/ga...ly/index2.html
http://tour1.nakedcollegegirls.tv/ga...ga/index2.html

http://www.fletchxxx.com

prety booked right now and have stuff Im working on but let me know if you want to add a little variety to those galleries, we ca work something out.

;)

Unless all your records are stored in your POB and you have someone named PCM standing there during regular business hours waiting to open the POB for any authorities that may ask, the info is inaccurate.

Why bother attempting to comply with 2257 if you're only going to do it half-assed?

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/2257.html

However, if your site is non-nude and there's no "sexually explicit conduct", you don't even need a 2257.

No need to argue, you're one step above Pedo, shoo.

THAT IS STUPID! I am promoting a wholesome model that has a unique website, how does that make me one step above "pedo"?

You were attempting to smear the good name of a quality site and model I am merely pointing out that she is indeed legal!

I don't see you mad at lightspeedcash for using uniformed girls on their sites :321GFY

Edit: Not worth it.

I didn't mention their program nor did I even intend to bring it into the scope of talking about you.

For starters, read over this:

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/2256.html

knowing the current administration, it's playing with fire. it may not necessarily be legal, but there could be grounds for investigations. all it takes is one shit disturber.

I'm sure 99 out of 100 on the street would say she's under 18 if I showed them this picture:

http://www.girlgirlkiss.com/tgpsubmi...allery1/01.jpg

If someone promotes a 21 yr girl who doesnt even show nudes hes almost a pedo?

Are you on fucking crack?

I dont see you say that everytime someone posts a picture of a chick who turned 18 one day ago with 3 big black cocks in her, thats alright i guess.