GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Less Anal Sex in Vids = Less AIDS (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=270209)

Mr. Marks 04-16-2004 02:22 AM

Less Anal Sex in Vids = Less AIDS
 
Really. The most recent AIDS scare hitting the industry is because of the OBLIGATORY Ass Fucking in every video out there.

Why not push the old standard... Vaginal Sex? Less chance of HIV infection.

I think this is because the industry is so damn EXTREME nowadays that a video doesn't feel 'complete' until there's a DOUBLE ANAL PENETRATION and ORAL CUMSHOT at the end.

This is lamentable and pathetic. Our talent is dying because the EXTREME has now become commonplace.


I bet the moral conservatives are having BLUE BALLS trying to shutdown the biz in the name of HEALTH and SAFETY.

:321GFY :321GFY :321GFY

beemk 04-16-2004 02:25 AM

thats like saying less sex = less aids. why dont they just do softcore only?

skinnay 04-16-2004 02:25 AM

is it easier to get aids from anal sex because you're not using a condow, or because shit is a better conducter of HIV or something?

bufferover 04-16-2004 02:27 AM

papichulo you are totaly right but without anal i don't belive that sex will sell to much

Mr. Marks 04-16-2004 02:27 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by beemk
thats like saying less sex = less aids. why dont they just do softcore only?

No its not, buttmunch. Are you so anally fixated that equate SEX with ANAL SEX?????

Mr. Marks 04-16-2004 02:28 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by dimitar
papichulo you are totaly right but without anal i don't belive that sex will sell to much

Hell no. Hardcore sells. Shit, all oral sex movie sites make better money than some of the gonzo bullshit out there.

It's all in SALESMANSHIP

Chicks don't have to die .... this shit is needless. :(

BRISK 04-16-2004 02:29 AM

As long as anal sex sells, people will produce anal content.

Gheenz 04-16-2004 02:30 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by beemk
thats like saying less sex = less aids. why dont they just do softcore only?
I think he's somewhat right though. They should use rubbers when doing anal also. There are little cuts and tears in the ass that the pornstars wouldn't never know about and easily spread fluids.

Mr. Marks 04-16-2004 02:30 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by skinnay
is it easier to get aids from anal sex because you're not using a condow, or because shit is a better conducter of HIV or something?

because the anal cavity was not designed for sex... so the lining is WAY WAY thinner than the vaginal cavity. Hence, any micro tear in the anal cavity of a woman and the sperm (and its HIV if present) goes straight to her bloodstream.

Mr. Marks 04-16-2004 02:31 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by BRISK
As long as anal sex sells, people will produce anal content.

Yeah, that's the DEMAND side. What about the SUPPLY side... when all the ones who'd do it are HIV-infected???

boneprone 04-16-2004 02:32 AM

I think we will see a reduction in tripple and double anal..

But single Anal is natural and will stay as Jesus has intended it to be.

Its natural.

Gheenz 04-16-2004 02:32 AM

Also, remember that pornstars are informed of and know the risks involved before they start. Goes with the territory.

BRISK 04-16-2004 02:32 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by papichulo



Yeah, that's the DEMAND side. What about the SUPPLY side... when all the ones who'd do it are HIV-infected???

Since when are they all infected? You're overreacting

Morgan 04-16-2004 02:33 AM

but we wanna wee 85 year old trannies, gargling diarrhea and shoving cactus up their ass!

Mr. Marks 04-16-2004 02:35 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by BRISK


Since when are they all infected? You're overreacting

I'm not saying they're all currently infected. But the thinking you described in your earlier post is what got the industry to its problem right now.

Remember, the safety measures pursued by AIM are currently VOLUNTARY. What if the government steps in with MANDATORY bans or worse yet... uses the "health and safety" issue as a camouflage for censorship? What then?

BRISK 04-16-2004 02:37 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by papichulo


I'm not saying they're all currently infected. But the thinking you described in your earlier post is what got the industry to its problem right now.

Remember, the safety measures pursued by AIM are currently VOLUNTARY. What if the government steps in with MANDATORY bans or worse yet... uses the "health and safety" issue as a camouflage for censorship? What then?

Then you produce anal content in every country besides the US

Veterans Day 04-16-2004 02:39 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by BRISK


Then you produce anal content in every country besides the US

isnt that how this started:helpme

Mr. Marks 04-16-2004 02:43 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by BRISK


Then you produce anal content in every country besides the US


Its gotta start somewhere....

Mr. Marks 04-16-2004 03:26 AM

I don't mean to sound the alarm but there's definitely a lot of issues to think about instead of just towing the ole.... "If the market wants it there will be production for it."

There's a ton of shit that there's a market for but people always draw the line.

Why not draw the line here because someone's daughter/son/friend/husband/wife is dying....?

BRISK 04-16-2004 03:34 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by papichulo
I don't mean to sound the alarm but there's definitely a lot of issues to think about instead of just towing the ole.... "If the market wants it there will be production for it."

There's a ton of shit that there's a market for but people always draw the line.

Why not draw the line here because someone's daughter/son/friend/husband/wife is dying....?

People die every day in all occupations. Deal with it.

Bus drivers die in car crashes, should there not be any more bus drivers?

Construction workers fall off buildings and die, maybe we shouldn't build anything anymore?

JFK was assasinated while he was president, should there not be anymore presidents?

People will continue to produce a product/service as long as they can make money from it. Just because some people have died as a result of producing that product/service doesn't mean people will stop producing it.

webmaster x 04-16-2004 04:33 AM

Yup! I go with papichulo's views. They are very reasonable.

Lykos 04-16-2004 05:04 AM

What was the point?:glugglug
Nice,but that won't help us,get over it,anal rocks:winkwink:

KraZ 04-16-2004 06:27 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by BRISK


People die every day in all occupations. Deal with it.

Bus drivers die in car crashes, should there not be any more bus drivers?

Construction workers fall off buildings and die, maybe we shouldn't build anything anymore?

JFK was assasinated while he was president, should there not be anymore presidents?

People will continue to produce a product/service as long as they can make money from it. Just because some people have died as a result of producing that product/service doesn't mean people will stop producing it.

Occupational hazards... I got it!

DR_PHIL 04-16-2004 06:30 AM

if extra money and more scenes mean no condoms then I dont want to hear the bitching when they get sick

steffie 04-16-2004 06:36 AM

Yup,,, you all go ahead and quit shooting ANAL sex scenes and lets see what happend to content already shot and watch how much your PROMO set will be..

There is nothing wrong with Anal sex, lot of guys love it and love seeing it. Everybody in this industry has to be careful period. Blowjobs, Anal, Regular sex etc etc.

Having sex without condoms nowadays is high risk and people who do it are normally married or have a steady partner. But I can see the other site of the coin to. Double Anal is hard to film in the first place, than having to rubbers at each other is even going to be more difficult.

There should be a better test for HIV for gals who opt to shoot without condoms. Most Porn Girls are still a lot safer than the girl you pick up in a bar, take home and nail (90% without protection)

geez

Ar3s 04-16-2004 06:41 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by beemk
thats like saying less sex = less aids. why dont they just do softcore only?
agree with you.. :glugglug

ProfitPrograms 04-16-2004 06:45 AM

i dont think that stopping anal would have any effect - the key is making everyone safe - if you knew that a girl had aids - would you fuck her in the pussy just because it was less risky than fucking her in the ass? i dont think so ... you wouldnt even accept a blowjob from her... i'd bet..


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:12 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123