Condom XXX or Bare back XXX?
 

What kind of Porn do you prefer?

Condom XXX or no Condom XXX?
With the advent thats happening in PornValley what ya think?
Ya prefer it or not?

If Condom only XXX became a requirment for producers will it hurt the business?

i heard that movies get lower ratings if condons are used. to me it doesnt matter but for others it might

I prefer movies where condoms are used. Makes me feel better about the industry knowing that the girls werent put in danger to make a buck.

it doesnt matter to me......the sex doesnt turn me on. it's when the jizz hits her face/mouth that im in heaven.

Condoms are better why take any risks !

Personally I don't like it with condoms. It just isn't as much of a turn on for me, for some reason.

Um what about guys put in danger?

This event will have serious repercussions on the American adult industry make no mistake about it.

I think also that condom XXX is not desirable by web audiences. Not being able to deliver will be forcing content to be shot outside jurisdictions.

Economically this is going to be a very devastating event.

No condoms..but they can airbrush pics anyways.It just takes away the effect of the money shot

don't watch much porn. if I do, i prefer no condom.

This is where the distributors have the power, if they only distribute condom porn .Then the overseas stuff will have a much harder time getting in. I dont see the big deal when they fuck the guy pulls out any way for the most part. so he fucks her with the condom, pulls out takes the condom off and cums on her tits .Whats the difference?

Check out the Nasty Dollars sites, condoms are used quite a bit and they are making bank.

Let's face it, pretty much everyone prefers bareback sex for their own sex life. You may use condoms religiously, but bareback sex is simply far more enjoyable and more of a turn on. People view porn for an escape, for the fantasy of it, and at least in their fantasies they want to see bareback sex. That is why porn shot with condoms is in far FAR less demand than the condom content is. That's just the way it is.


People aren't going to stop fantasizing about bareback sex no matter how many XXX actors come down with HIV. Porn producers will not stop making bareback porn, so the only line of defense IS rigid testing. Everyone involved in production needs to take a long hard look at just how much attention is paid to testing, proof of testing, zero tolerance for those with non-current AIM docs, etc.

If we aren't willing to look after ourselves, I'm sure the government will be all too happy to step in and regulate the industry up the fucking ying-yang.

I am a firm believer in comdoms, I use one every day and I am married.

The producers can roll up there sleeves and see what happens and I think it is a emm for lack of a better word a "crap shoot" sorry nopun intended, concerning what is sold over all for top dollar to buyers and from them the web audience.

Face it we are at the mercy of what the audiences in there own ways demand.

bareback for sure

I actually enjoy seeing condom-covered cocks pumping pussies :Graucho

People have fantasizes about kids should the industry do that? People have fantasize about fucking a girl and then chopping off her head off should the industry do that because people want it .

Bareback for me definately.

For me it doesn't matter, I don't mind condoms at all if the sex is hot. But I know guys are more pickier about their porn, and I would guess that most don't want to see condoms in porn.

Very good point.

Such an idiot thing to say. I'm speechless, I had no idea you could say something this retarded. You're comparing kiddy porn to straight bareback sex? Get real. I'm talking about audience demand in the area of regular porn. Why do you want to draw comparisons to cp? Are you sitting there thinking about cp? Is that it?

Actually it's a pretty fuckiing stupid point.

Thank you , its like people give me a fucking break. I am all for making money but you have to be responsible if you want to make money for more than just today.

Are you a idiot you know what I am talking about . People are now infected and now can die from bareback porn and you want to encourage it because fucking people fantasize about it .

Very hard to answer as I personally would prefer viewing hardcore material with sex in its rawest form (without condoms), but as a producer I also understand the need for talent to be protected.

I would offer enforcing stricter criteria with regards to testing; and promote hardcore sex-without concoms as a more valuable niche.

BLACKBALL PORN PROVIDERS WHO DO NOT ENFORCE TESTING. :2 cents:

The hollywood horror industry has been doing stuff like that for decades. Tons of erotic horror out there with bizarre special f/x. But producing hardcore porn and incorporating that kind of effect with it is illegal, as is kiddy porn.



Are you saying bareback sex in porn should be made illegal?

Dear fucktard... I am encouraging nothing. I was merely explaining why it is the way it is. If you can't understand plain english, why not enroll in ESL?

It shouldnt have to be made illegal it should be common sense if people are getting sick and can die.

You were the one asking if I was thinking of cp. If you are going to use the arguement its what people want .There are lots of things people want that we dont give them . If people can get sick and die from this what makes this different?

Just to be safe - use a condom. But for more horny action - take it off!

Although condoms are safer for everyone, I prefer porn that has bareback sex. Seeing the condom ruins the fantasy for me.. :2 cents:

Agreed, but how does the average webmaster go about confirming that someone isn't keeping their people on top of testing?

Like anything else in this industry, greed will usually always win out over common sense. Just look at how many have chosen to go the way of spamming, or running malicious dialers, or outright copyright theft, all in order to make the almighty dollar.

I can envision the porn producer who has his one and only stunt cock show up for that day and doesn't have current AIM in order... but rather than send home the 4 models and the 3 support staff and lose $5k he takes a chance and shoots anyway.


I would not be at all surprised if production became highly regulated in some way by the government, because obviously there are producers out there (and models, actors etc) that can't seem to regulate themselves and their businesses in this area.

Well for one, cp is illegal. Regular porn... isn't.



I'll ask again.... do you want bareback content to become illegal?

It dosn't really matter to me, condom or no condom.

Do you really think the Govt is going to come in a regulate porn , thats makes it ok to do . If the government comes in they will stop porn production. Also I am sorry I called you a idiot, I am a big advocate of protecting children so the comment about thinking of CP set me off. I used CP because I wanted strong example.

If people are getting sick and can die from shooting it . I think we should practice the good sense not to shoot it not wait til it becomes illegal.

I was not using it as an argument. Again, you are lacking something in your understanding of what I wrote. I'm not sure what.

I stated it as fact. Because it is fact. The largest chunk of the porn viewing audience prefers bareback content, as is obviously reflected by sales volumes. There was an article by duke floored last week all about this, it was in the GFY mailer.

Fair enough. I didn't appreciate the question you asked, and I don't like nor will I tolerate ridiculous comparisons like that. Comparing cp to regular porn is the last thing we need to be doing. We may as well shoot ourselves in both feet as do that.

Not going to happen.

Condom is a big turnoff for me honestly ... I wear one with short term relationship but as soon as it<s long time fuck the condom

I agree that is what a large chunk of people want but vivid does well and isnt everything they do with condoms? The last Ed Powers movie I saw dd 201 I think he was using condoms. I think if that become the norm people will accept it . There is more to a hot sex scene than bareback to me.

This incident may force PornValley to shoot condom only porn.
I wouldnt rule it out as a possibility that it could really happen.

Couple scenerios.

A: Girls may flock to the valley cuz they know condom sex is required.

B: Will go else where or rather forced else where forhigher Money...

Sadly I agree with you .

Yep. If condoms were required for all types of sex, I might have became a porn star instead of a dancer... :warning

:thumbsup

I married a Dancer/Stripper:)
They know how to have fun:thumbsup

I personally don't give a flying fuck. It's better if the talent is safe and not treated like a giant dollar sign. I'd imagine a condom would make those into the reality porn feel like the action is even more authentic.

I personally don't care what the dick looks like. I'm more interested in seeing 2 hot ladies going at it. :Graucho

Well regardless of what we want, itis inevitable that product will be driven by demand.
If traffic prefer's no condom sex there wont be much choice for theindustry as a whole toprovide that. Those that don't will loose business or have to relocate thier business.

This is an economic question not a human one persay though the ideal is to protect our folk who put there lives on the line its not a perfectworld.
Ultimatly market will decide what they want and ultimatly our industry will cater to it.