GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   EMAIL: Woman's body crazy with sex. (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=269759)

MasterBlogger 04-15-2004 09:42 AM

EMAIL: Woman's body crazy with sex.
 
Quote:

MESSAGE:

I\'m 20. I am single, I have never been kissed, and never had a boyfriend.
Frankly, this is getting really really boring.

My body is now a woman\'s and it is starting to get crazy. It wants to have sex.
Masturbation just isn\'t gonna cut it. I also want to have a baby. I grew up around
babies and children and I know how to take care of them. I\'m not trying to prove
anything, but I kind of am, because everyone keeps saying that I\'m not ready.

I know that I am emotionally, physically, and I am most definitely intellectually
ready.

I have waited for a very long time to be kissed and everyone just keeps telling me
to be patient...

I have been. I want something and my body is going crazy and wants sex. My mind
wants it too.

Plus, I want to start to live and I don\'t just want a boyfriend, I want to get
married. And sex is NOT going to happen unless I am married.

What the heck am I supposed to do??
How would you answer this email?

sherie 04-15-2004 09:44 AM

Just tell her you're a PEDOPHILE and you know nothing about women!

skinnay 04-15-2004 09:44 AM

with my phone number :thumbsup

MasterBlogger 04-15-2004 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by sherie
Just tell her you're a PEDOPHILE and you know nothing about women!
This has a more interesting answer then the standard GFY "sheep" type bashing.

How do you - interpret - and how would you answer this email?

MasterBlogger 04-15-2004 09:46 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by skinnay
with my phone number :thumbsup
Humour ...
hmmmmmmmmm

flashfreak 04-15-2004 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MasterBlogger


How would you answer this email?

simple is the best: "I'm horny too, where do you live?"

Trixie Racer 04-15-2004 09:50 AM

I don't believe it. Unless she lives in another country, there is no way a woman could make it to 20 years old and still be THAT innocent! :throwup

MasterBlogger 04-15-2004 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by flashfreak

simple is the best: "I'm horny too, where do you live?"

The purpose of the above quoted email is NOT to have sex.
How would you answer the email?

You know - I already know - how I would answer it.

roybucks 04-15-2004 09:52 AM

get her or it to send pics first!

MasterBlogger 04-15-2004 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Trixie Racer
I don't believe it. Unless she lives in another country, there is no way a woman could make it to 20 years old and still be THAT innocent! :throwup
hmmm...
not bad ...

swedguy 04-15-2004 09:54 AM

You are nothing but human waste.


SexEducation aka MasterBlogger - Time to tell us why you had CP on your site.

This is not a direct link to the CP you had on SexEd, it is safe to click it. It's a snapshot of what was inside the folder " /private/sexeducation_com/graphics_sexeducation_com/ch*deleted*ld_pornography/ " at sexeducation.com

If you click on the links at archive.org, you will see what those pics contained. Not safe to click on, contains underage nudity.

http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://sexeducation.com/private/sexeducation_com/graphics_sexeducation_com/child_pornography/*

Courtesy of archive.org


Can you explain why you had CP pics on sexeducation.com?


Yes, I know you have me on ignore.

MasterBlogger 04-15-2004 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by roybucks
get her or it to send pics first!
another very good point.
we are not truly sure of the gender of the author ..

very, very true.
we can assess the email and assume a gender, however that assumption is just that - an assumption.

I have more then once mis-interpreted an email sent to me by replying to the person using the wrong gender.

Stuff happens.

MasterBlogger 04-15-2004 09:56 AM

Yawnnnnnn .... :(

swedguy
04-15-2004 05:54 PM This person is on your Ignore List. To view this post click [here]

MasterBlogger 04-15-2004 09:57 AM

Come on ...
no-one actually going to take a crack at answering this email sent to SexEducation.com yesterday?

puresexnow 04-15-2004 09:59 AM

Well, from the email we know she is 20, never been kissed and won't have sex until she's married.

Let's assume that she is also fat and/or hideously ugly coupled with an overbearing christian personality.

Tell her to pretty herself up, reassess her morals and try getting out of the house to meet people.

MasterBlogger 04-15-2004 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by puresexnow
Well, from the email we know she is 20, never been kissed and won't have sex until she's married.

Let's assume that she is also fat and/or hideously ugly coupled with an overbearing christian personality.

Tell her to pretty herself up, reassess her morals and try getting out of the house to meet people.


So you take the "facts" in the email to be true?
You personally, actually believe this email is genuine?
If so - why?

Because my answer would be - "Don't give up your daytime creative writing classes as they will assist you in drafting better emails in the future."

The problem with this email is that the grammar and syntax is inconsistent with the 10 years of emails I have received. The email is so blatently bad as a "true" email from a genuinely concerned person, I would hope the person that sent this has no capacity with regardes to anytype of decision making process regarding internet content.

IPK 04-15-2004 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by sherie
Just tell her you're a PEDOPHILE and you know nothing about women!
:1orglaugh

ldinternet 04-15-2004 10:15 AM

MasterBlogger
04-15-2004 05:42 PM This pedophile is on your Ignore List. To view this post click [here]

MasterBlogger 04-15-2004 10:18 AM

Then ...
after stating to the author to continue with their "daytime creative writing classes"...
I would ask what their motivation for creating and sending the email was?

Why would someone take the time to send an email so "perfectly" drafted?

MasterBlogger 04-15-2004 10:19 AM

Yawwwwwnnnnnnn ...

ldinternet
04-15-2004 06:15 PM This person is on your Ignore List. To view this post click [here]

Quatermain 04-15-2004 10:23 AM

MasterBlogger
04-15-2004 05:42 PM This pedophile is on your Ignore List. To view this post click [here]

MasterBlogger 04-15-2004 10:23 AM

Quatermain
04-15-2004 06:23 PM This person is on your Ignore List. To view this post click [here]

Ice 04-15-2004 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by sherie
Just tell her you're a PEDOPHILE and you know nothing about women!

fris 04-15-2004 10:26 AM

SexEducation aka MasterBlogger - Time to tell us why you had CP on your site.

This is not a direct link to the CP you had on SexEd, it is safe to click it. It's a snapshot of what was inside the folder " /private/sexeducation_com/graphics_sexeducation_com/ch*deleted*ld_pornography/ " at sexeducation.com

If you click on the links at archive.org, you will see what those pics contained. Not safe to click on, contains underage nudity.

http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://sexeducation.com/private/sexeducation_com/graphics_sexeducation_com/child_pornography/*

Courtesy of archive.org

Ice 04-15-2004 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by swedguy
You are nothing but human waste.


SexEducation aka MasterBlogger - Time to tell us why you had CP on your site.

This is not a direct link to the CP you had on SexEd, it is safe to click it. It's a snapshot of what was inside the folder " /private/sexeducation_com/graphics_sexeducation_com/ch*deleted*ld_pornography/ " at sexeducation.com

If you click on the links at archive.org, you will see what those pics contained. Not safe to click on, contains underage nudity.

http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://sexeducation.com/private/sexeducation_com/graphics_sexeducation_com/child_pornography/*

Courtesy of archive.org


Can you explain why you had CP pics on sexeducation.com?


Yes, I know you have me on ignore.

I think Im on his ignore list too but I'll quote ya and see if the PEDO can read it

Doctor Dre 04-15-2004 10:27 AM

Tell her that in modern society 99.9 % of people have sex before marriage . There is nothing wrong with that as long as she protect herself .

Tell her that a lot of mans will really be turned on by her virginity and will take the risk of waiting for it to happen . She can play that card too to get a husban.

Gemini 04-15-2004 10:27 AM

If you believe that email is real and nothing more than a sales pitch to get you to reply (most likely to one of those Russian Wife sites or the like) you're dumber than I thought. :helpme

Quatermain 04-15-2004 10:28 AM

POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE

Quatermain 04-15-2004 10:31 AM

POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE

MasterBlogger 04-15-2004 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Gemini
If you believe that email is real and nothing more than a sales pitch to get you to reply (most likely to one of those Russian Wife sites or the like) you're dumber than I thought. :helpme
I agree with you.
I hope the email is NOT from a "law enforcement" officer because if it is - the internet is in worse shape then I thought.

Quatermain 04-15-2004 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Quatermain
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE


Quatermain 04-15-2004 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Quatermain
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE


MasterBlogger 04-15-2004 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by fris
SexEducation aka MasterBlogger - Time to tell us why you had CP on your site.

This is not a direct link to the CP you had on SexEd, it is safe to click it. It's a snapshot of what was inside the folder " /private/sexeducation_com/graphics_sexeducation_com/ch*deleted*ld_pornography/ " at sexeducation.com

If you click on the links at archive.org, you will see what those pics contained. Not safe to click on, contains underage nudity.

http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://sexeducation.com/private/sexeducation_com/graphics_sexeducation_com/child_pornography/*

Courtesy of archive.org

I have attempted to follow your "safe link" - NOT to "CP" and it does not load. As long as you are not stating a link is to CP I will follow it and discuss any issue relating to it.

It is against the law to knowingly follow links to CP.

Please double check the URL and repost it as your quoted URL does not load for me.

Gemini 04-15-2004 10:38 AM

It wouldn't benefit any law agency to do that...

I'm 20. removes anything they have to say as 20 is over the age of majority in most countries.

Jer 04-15-2004 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MasterBlogger


I have attempted to follow your "safe link" - NOT to "CP" and it does not load. As long as you are not stating a link is to CP I will follow it and discuss any issue relating to it.

It is against the law to knowingly follow links to CP.

Please double check the URL and repost it as your quoted URL does not load for me.

Just copy and paste, idiot.

MasterBlogger 04-15-2004 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by fris
SexEducation aka MasterBlogger - Time to tell us why you had CP on your site.

This is not a direct link to the CP you had on SexEd, it is safe to click it. It's a snapshot of what was inside the folder " /private/sexeducation_com/graphics_sexeducation_com/ch*deleted*ld_pornography/ " at sexeducation.com

If you click on the links at archive.org, you will see what those pics contained. Not safe to click on, contains underage nudity.

http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://sexeducation.com/private/sexeducation_com/graphics_sexeducation_com/child_pornography/*

Courtesy of archive.org

Never mind ...
I got the URL to work.

The two graphics contained at Archives.org, as presented by your URL were the "tamest" examples of "Russian" advertisments posted into Usenet several years ago - I could find. Others (especially multiple model ones) that were posted at that time - are too ugly even to describe.

I censored the graphics and wrote an essay which banned all ".RU" email addresses from obtaining a free SexEducation.com membership. I posted that essay on the homepage of SexEducation.com . At that point in time Russia was (IMO) the world's number one distributor of child pornography.

Other domains I banned were ".AT" and ".TO" for being the second and third worst.

My "rating" of the world's worst countries for CP distribution was based on a random sampling of graphics where URLs were included to promote some internet address.

As a result of SexEducation.com banning all ".RU" email addresses - Overture.com terminated my advertising account with them for being - "...o*penly against groups of people."

What's nice about owning SexEducation.com is just that - I own it. And may once again, ban complete countries from access to it. In fact, if I ever do another "banning" I may even include a referer filter so that even the homepage of SexEducation.com would not show.

CP is an ugly topic - and not one which SexEducation.com will ignore.


John Beacock
Suite 353, Unit 204
1440 - 52 Street NE
Calgary, AB
Canada
T2A 4E8

1-403-619-2739

MasterBlogger 04-15-2004 11:10 AM

Did that answer your question Fris?

MasterBlogger 04-15-2004 11:17 AM

REPOST:
Did that answer your question Fris?

GiantGnome 04-15-2004 11:24 AM

SexEducation aka MasterBlogger - Time to tell us why you had CP on your site.

This is not a direct link to the CP you had on SexEd, it is safe to click it. It's a snapshot of what was inside the folder " /private/sexeducation_com/graphics_sexeducation_com/ch*deleted*ld_pornography/ " at sexeducation.com

If you click on the links at archive.org, you will see what those pics contained. Not safe to click on, contains underage nudity.

http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://sexeducation.com/private/sexeducation_com/graphics_sexeducation_com/child_pornography/*

Courtesy of archive.org


Can you explain why you had CP pics on sexeducation.com?

MasterBlogger 04-15-2004 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MasterBlogger


Never mind ...
I got the URL to work.

The two graphics contained at Archives.org, as presented by your URL were the "tamest" examples of "Russian" advertisments posted into Usenet several years ago - I could find. Others (especially multiple model ones) that were posted at that time - are too ugly even to describe.

I censored the graphics and wrote an essay which banned all ".RU" email addresses from obtaining a free SexEducation.com membership. I posted that essay on the homepage of SexEducation.com . At that point in time Russia was (IMO) the world's number one distributor of child pornography.

Other domains I banned were ".AT" and ".TO" for being the second and third worst.

My "rating" of the world's worst countries for CP distribution was based on a random sampling of graphics where URLs were included to promote some internet address.

As a result of SexEducation.com banning all ".RU" email addresses - Overture.com terminated my advertising account with them for being - "...o*penly against groups of people."

What's nice about owning SexEducation.com is just that - I own it. And may once again, ban complete countries from access to it. In fact, if I ever do another "banning" I may even include a referer filter so that even the homepage of SexEducation.com would not show.

CP is an ugly topic - and not one which SexEducation.com will ignore.


John Beacock
Suite 353, Unit 204
1440 - 52 Street NE
Calgary, AB
Canada
T2A 4E8

1-403-619-2739


MasterBlogger 04-15-2004 11:54 AM

Does that answer your question GiantGnome?

Ricky Dynamite 04-15-2004 12:09 PM

I got an email saying you're a pedo.

MasterBlogger 04-15-2004 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Ricky Dynamite
I got an email saying you're a pedo.
Post it here - please.
Include the full header information as well.

Quatermain 04-15-2004 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jokke
wow best reply sofar from ya. Still sucks you had the pics up.

But i dont think your a pedephile no more

I have some great water front property for sale...

Centurion 04-15-2004 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MasterBlogger


How would you answer this email?

Hello Clueless!

No wonder you are having a difficult time answering this email.
She's too OLD FOR YOU! :1orglaugh

And you're still so retarded that you bring "your business" here to ATTEMPT to make yourself look legit! I'm willing to bet this so called "email" is as fake as your address! Who in their right mind would ever want advice from a pedo like you?

MasterBlogger 04-15-2004 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Ricky Dynamite
I got an email saying you're a pedo.
I'm serious.
Post the email here please.

It's not the first time someone has hijacked my SMTP server and/or forged email address headers.

The fact is though - SexEducation.com has NEVER sent any spam email EVER !! Not once.

I remember one time someone was sending me 10,000 emails an hour. I began bouncing them back but it bogged my server down. So because I don't send email I just removed it from the DNS. With that many failed email requests being errored on the DNS - someone somewhere had to of known of the "situation".
: )

"Any cowardly father that permits the circumcision of their daughter should be castrated" was the campaign..lol

MasterBlogger 04-15-2004 12:24 PM

Quatermain
04-15-2004 08:19 PM This person is on your Ignore List. To view this post click [here]


Centurion
04-15-2004 08:20 PM This person is on your Ignore List. To view this post click [here]

cayne 04-15-2004 12:38 PM

normally I delete spam...:Graucho

C-Bass 04-15-2004 12:38 PM

20 and hasnt been kissed????




what is she? 230 lbs?

SomeCreep 04-15-2004 12:39 PM

50 women's bodies crazy with sex :glugglug


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:18 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123