![]() |
EMAIL: Woman's body crazy with sex.
Quote:
|
Just tell her you're a PEDOPHILE and you know nothing about women!
|
with my phone number :thumbsup
|
Quote:
How do you - interpret - and how would you answer this email? |
Quote:
hmmmmmmmmm |
Quote:
|
I don't believe it. Unless she lives in another country, there is no way a woman could make it to 20 years old and still be THAT innocent! :throwup
|
Quote:
How would you answer the email? You know - I already know - how I would answer it. |
get her or it to send pics first!
|
Quote:
not bad ... |
You are nothing but human waste.
SexEducation aka MasterBlogger - Time to tell us why you had CP on your site. This is not a direct link to the CP you had on SexEd, it is safe to click it. It's a snapshot of what was inside the folder " /private/sexeducation_com/graphics_sexeducation_com/ch*deleted*ld_pornography/ " at sexeducation.com If you click on the links at archive.org, you will see what those pics contained. Not safe to click on, contains underage nudity. http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://sexeducation.com/private/sexeducation_com/graphics_sexeducation_com/child_pornography/* Courtesy of archive.org Can you explain why you had CP pics on sexeducation.com? Yes, I know you have me on ignore. |
Quote:
we are not truly sure of the gender of the author .. very, very true. we can assess the email and assume a gender, however that assumption is just that - an assumption. I have more then once mis-interpreted an email sent to me by replying to the person using the wrong gender. Stuff happens. |
Yawnnnnnn .... :(
swedguy 04-15-2004 05:54 PM This person is on your Ignore List. To view this post click [here] |
Come on ...
no-one actually going to take a crack at answering this email sent to SexEducation.com yesterday? |
Well, from the email we know she is 20, never been kissed and won't have sex until she's married.
Let's assume that she is also fat and/or hideously ugly coupled with an overbearing christian personality. Tell her to pretty herself up, reassess her morals and try getting out of the house to meet people. |
Quote:
So you take the "facts" in the email to be true? You personally, actually believe this email is genuine? If so - why? Because my answer would be - "Don't give up your daytime creative writing classes as they will assist you in drafting better emails in the future." The problem with this email is that the grammar and syntax is inconsistent with the 10 years of emails I have received. The email is so blatently bad as a "true" email from a genuinely concerned person, I would hope the person that sent this has no capacity with regardes to anytype of decision making process regarding internet content. |
Quote:
|
MasterBlogger
04-15-2004 05:42 PM This pedophile is on your Ignore List. To view this post click [here] |
Then ...
after stating to the author to continue with their "daytime creative writing classes"... I would ask what their motivation for creating and sending the email was? Why would someone take the time to send an email so "perfectly" drafted? |
Yawwwwwnnnnnnn ...
ldinternet 04-15-2004 06:15 PM This person is on your Ignore List. To view this post click [here] |
MasterBlogger
04-15-2004 05:42 PM This pedophile is on your Ignore List. To view this post click [here] |
Quatermain
04-15-2004 06:23 PM This person is on your Ignore List. To view this post click [here] |
Quote:
|
SexEducation aka MasterBlogger - Time to tell us why you had CP on your site.
This is not a direct link to the CP you had on SexEd, it is safe to click it. It's a snapshot of what was inside the folder " /private/sexeducation_com/graphics_sexeducation_com/ch*deleted*ld_pornography/ " at sexeducation.com If you click on the links at archive.org, you will see what those pics contained. Not safe to click on, contains underage nudity. http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://sexeducation.com/private/sexeducation_com/graphics_sexeducation_com/child_pornography/* Courtesy of archive.org |
Quote:
|
Tell her that in modern society 99.9 % of people have sex before marriage . There is nothing wrong with that as long as she protect herself .
Tell her that a lot of mans will really be turned on by her virginity and will take the risk of waiting for it to happen . She can play that card too to get a husban. |
If you believe that email is real and nothing more than a sales pitch to get you to reply (most likely to one of those Russian Wife sites or the like) you're dumber than I thought. :helpme
|
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE |
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE
POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE POCK FACED PAEDOPHILE |
Quote:
I hope the email is NOT from a "law enforcement" officer because if it is - the internet is in worse shape then I thought. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It is against the law to knowingly follow links to CP. Please double check the URL and repost it as your quoted URL does not load for me. |
It wouldn't benefit any law agency to do that...
I'm 20. removes anything they have to say as 20 is over the age of majority in most countries. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I got the URL to work. The two graphics contained at Archives.org, as presented by your URL were the "tamest" examples of "Russian" advertisments posted into Usenet several years ago - I could find. Others (especially multiple model ones) that were posted at that time - are too ugly even to describe. I censored the graphics and wrote an essay which banned all ".RU" email addresses from obtaining a free SexEducation.com membership. I posted that essay on the homepage of SexEducation.com . At that point in time Russia was (IMO) the world's number one distributor of child pornography. Other domains I banned were ".AT" and ".TO" for being the second and third worst. My "rating" of the world's worst countries for CP distribution was based on a random sampling of graphics where URLs were included to promote some internet address. As a result of SexEducation.com banning all ".RU" email addresses - Overture.com terminated my advertising account with them for being - "...o*penly against groups of people." What's nice about owning SexEducation.com is just that - I own it. And may once again, ban complete countries from access to it. In fact, if I ever do another "banning" I may even include a referer filter so that even the homepage of SexEducation.com would not show. CP is an ugly topic - and not one which SexEducation.com will ignore. John Beacock Suite 353, Unit 204 1440 - 52 Street NE Calgary, AB Canada T2A 4E8 1-403-619-2739 |
Did that answer your question Fris?
|
REPOST:
Did that answer your question Fris? |
SexEducation aka MasterBlogger - Time to tell us why you had CP on your site.
This is not a direct link to the CP you had on SexEd, it is safe to click it. It's a snapshot of what was inside the folder " /private/sexeducation_com/graphics_sexeducation_com/ch*deleted*ld_pornography/ " at sexeducation.com If you click on the links at archive.org, you will see what those pics contained. Not safe to click on, contains underage nudity. http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://sexeducation.com/private/sexeducation_com/graphics_sexeducation_com/child_pornography/* Courtesy of archive.org Can you explain why you had CP pics on sexeducation.com? |
Quote:
|
Does that answer your question GiantGnome?
|
I got an email saying you're a pedo.
|
Quote:
Include the full header information as well. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
No wonder you are having a difficult time answering this email. She's too OLD FOR YOU! :1orglaugh And you're still so retarded that you bring "your business" here to ATTEMPT to make yourself look legit! I'm willing to bet this so called "email" is as fake as your address! Who in their right mind would ever want advice from a pedo like you? |
Quote:
Post the email here please. It's not the first time someone has hijacked my SMTP server and/or forged email address headers. The fact is though - SexEducation.com has NEVER sent any spam email EVER !! Not once. I remember one time someone was sending me 10,000 emails an hour. I began bouncing them back but it bogged my server down. So because I don't send email I just removed it from the DNS. With that many failed email requests being errored on the DNS - someone somewhere had to of known of the "situation". : ) "Any cowardly father that permits the circumcision of their daughter should be castrated" was the campaign..lol |
Quatermain
04-15-2004 08:19 PM This person is on your Ignore List. To view this post click [here] Centurion 04-15-2004 08:20 PM This person is on your Ignore List. To view this post click [here] |
normally I delete spam...:Graucho
|
20 and hasnt been kissed????
what is she? 230 lbs? |
50 women's bodies crazy with sex :glugglug
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:18 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123