twin towers were brought down by explosive devices
 

A dear friend of mine was able to make a written transcript of the NYFD video mpeg movie that appeared on Alex Jones Prison Planet. Here, then is the link to the video and the transcript she wrote:

http://www.prisonplanet.tv/discussion_in_firehouse.mpg

This transcript is as close as I can get...more connections to detonators in the building.

1st Fireman: "What the f**k? What do we do? We made it outside. We made about a block."

2nd fireman: " We made it at least 2 blocks and we started running. Floor by floor started popping out."

1st fireman: "It was as if they had detonators,"

2nd fireman: "Yeah, detonators."

1st fireman: "As if they had plans to take down the building. It went boom boom boom..."

2nd fireman: "...all the way down. I was watching it and running. and you just saw this cloud of shit chasing you down."

3rd fireman: "So what'd you do?"

2nd fireman: "You couldn't outrun it. You couldn't outrun it. I behind a battalion car. I hid under an car just waiting to die.

The 9-11 Commission should be hearing this instead of Condaleeza Rice

The voices that come out of my showerhead told me the EXACT SAME THING! They should be looking into this~ !:BangBang:

remember we did this so we can eventually drill for oil in alaska.

Yes... I'm sure Bush and his whole family are responsible.


Thanks for the laugh.


Now if you will excuse me, I have a tin-foil hat to make.

?

Careful vegas2003... the feds are going to bust down your door any minute now.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Wow, my goat told me the same thing this morning. Well I'll be damned.

Go figure.

http://homepages.wmich.edu/~e9dei/di...unny%20pic.jpg

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

I already have my tin foil hat on and it is helping me to see clearly..

I mean, something is going to fall like a building, I would think that there may be a few popping sounds.

Remember, this is not a tree in a forrest with no one to hera it fall.

That's exactly what my grandfather told me, 5 years before 911.

Damn, my reputable source told me the same thing !

http://www.spatulaproductions.com/sp...ychictable.jpg

there is no way in hell BOTH of thos buildings would come straight down like they did. There were Explosives, The gov't knew these buildings would be hit before they were. It was our Government that brought down those buildings. They would have stood:2 cents:

http://www.unca.edu/housing/images/s...acy-theory.jpg

Probably true though :Hollering

BACK AWAY FROM THE CRACK PIPE

No, I enjoy it with lunch

Is their a full moon tonight where you live?

Sigh.

regardless if it was detonators or planes....the government fucked up MAJORLY.


off with their heads!

dont know about the twin towers, but building 6 going down was complete bullshit.. there wasnt any serious fire in there and nothing hit that building.. since when do steel building collapse just because of fire?

I have one word for you nuts... "truss".

so what's the motivation behind bringing them down entirely when they are hit?

Explosive Devices=Planes full of jet fuel

building 6 = a glitch in the Matrix

Drama, to get the US to support these CRAZY WARS

:1orglaugh

I would think that two Boeing 767s full of jet fuel would qualify as the "explosive devices" that brought down the buildings.

but the upper sections came down as a whole, the lowers blew up, the jet fuel was burning, where does heat go? oh yeah UP that should have caused the upper sections to FALL OVER if anything not fall through a solid building

So what is the motive for bringing down the buildings with explosives? How would the explosives be setup? There would be alot of jackhammering to get the explosives setup right.

read the thread for the motive, I already said it

Besides, why would it take alot of jackhammering to get the explosives set right.. a plane in the side of a building levels it perfectly every time? why have we wasted so much research on controlled destruction.. we could have just ran planes into everything we wanna knock down!

yeh running planes into buildings is much cheaper than dynamite :1orglaugh

Do you think that maybe the weight of the top collapsing could have caused it? Go back to playing with your tinker toys, and let the grownups figure it out. We will tell you when you're old enough.:321GFY

Vegas 2003
1715 posts

spanky part 2:
63 posts

Priceless
:1orglaugh

And another worthless vegas2003 thread. That guy has mental problems. And his friends as well.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

This was already explained by one of the head engineers of the building. Weight of the upper floors collapsing created a domino effect. Pretty simple to understand.

since when do steel building collapse just because of fire?..

Heat softens the steel beams until they are almost like rubber - elastic rods... Especially with the old 'insulation' forms they used when those buildings were built.

The towers lost structural integrity of the floors where the fuel was burning and caused those columns to buckle fairly quickly due to the massive weight of the floors above. Once those columns started giving it was a chain reaction and one whole floor collapsed.

Once that happened the sheer magnitude of force and weight drove the buildings almost straight down.

If you look at the videos, the one towers top section 10-20(?) floors DID in fact lean and fall off to the side as the rest of that tower came almost straight to the ground.

it went "boom boom boom" floor by floor because THE FUCKING THING WAS COLLAPSING! One floor dropping ontop the other.

Fucking idiot conspirors. :321GFY

People like vegasshit2003 live for conspiracy's. If there isnt one they create one.
Idiots.

this is a pretty funny thread!!

I think you are getting your towers confused.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/l...236nov29.story

"Most of the three other buildings in the complex, 4, 5 and 6 World Trade, remained standing despite suffering damage of all kinds, including fire. Still, experts concede, in a hellish day, 7 World Trade might have sustained structural injuries never envisioned in fire codes."

If you were talking about WTC 7, the reason I have heard from several sources was the number of diesel storage tanks for generating electricity on fire was the root cause of the collapse of the building.

But belive what you want, maybe this will help you with the voices from your showerhead, dog, mercury tooth fillings, etc.

Aluminum Foil Deflector Beanie :1orglaugh :Graucho :1orglaugh

I read the thread twice and don't see where you talk about a motive.

If you set alot of small exploives to take down a building, the explosives need to be put into the structure itself (right into the framework). You cann't just tape a bunch of small explosives to a build and hope it brings it down. To take down a building, you need to make holes in the framework and set the explosives in those holes. Therefore jackhammering comes into play.

You can cause damage to a building by just taping the explosives. But it's harder to take the building down if the explosives were just held in place instead of place with in the framework. I learned this from watch how they setup buildings to be taken down by explosives on tv. So I could be wrong on all of this.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

A structure so tall and heavy could not POSSIBLY fall OVER. Gravity is too strong of a force. It would fall straight down, like it did.

and you got your engineering degree from a box of Cracker Jack or Lego?

1st fireman: "It was as if they had detonators,"


IF they had ...

Maybe the building wasn't as safe as they tought!

ah, there is intelligent life on this planet

A solid building? We are not talking a pile of stacked bricks here. Ever heard of office space?