GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Who's the moron with kids in their gallery? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=265527)

emmanuelle 04-06-2004 08:20 PM

Who's the moron with kids in their gallery?
 
http://sexynews.us/voyeur008/

Marcus Aurelius 04-06-2004 08:21 PM

HOLY SHIT..not good.

Illicit 04-06-2004 08:22 PM

thats fucked !

TekayRoyal 04-06-2004 08:22 PM

WTF......that kind of shit will fuck us all

KMR Stitch 04-06-2004 08:22 PM

It's wrong...no one is nakkid though..

dav555add 04-06-2004 08:23 PM

:mad:

SirSmokeALot 04-06-2004 08:23 PM

WTF :eek2 What a dumb mo-fo

Marcus Aurelius 04-06-2004 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by KMR Stitch
It's wrong...no one is nakkid though..
True, but not the kind of attention anyone should be drawing, not in this administration.

Spunky 04-06-2004 08:24 PM

Disturbing

tootie 04-06-2004 08:26 PM

OMG people should really pay more attention to what the hell is in the pictures they're taking and posting. :feels-hot

Vanilla DeVille 04-06-2004 08:28 PM

WTF!

Dawgy 04-06-2004 08:29 PM

whoever took those pics is obviously a pedo... there is no way either that boy or girl is over 18...

brickbat 04-06-2004 08:33 PM

For anyone who thinks it's <a href="http://www.asacp.org/reportsite.html">reportworthy</a>

Makingcoin 04-06-2004 08:35 PM

Is that at a fucking waterpark?

Someone needs their nuts smashed with a sledge hammer.

:feels-hot

Thomas1007 04-06-2004 08:35 PM

aint even gonna click that
dont need that shit on my pc thank you very much
from what I just read report the fucin pedo
and be done with it
:thumbsup

Illicit 04-06-2004 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by mdcq


True, but not the kind of attention anyone should be drawing, not in this administration.

ugghhh this kind of shit pisses me off...

69pornlinks 04-06-2004 08:42 PM

it's prolly sponsor content

Webasic 04-06-2004 08:45 PM

not good.

Martin 04-06-2004 08:48 PM

Sad. Very sad.

Quotealex 04-06-2004 08:51 PM

I would report this to his/her sponsor(s) and host.

Phil 04-06-2004 08:55 PM

almost puked... sick motherfucker.
Pure CP... castrate that bustard...

Katlicious72 04-06-2004 09:08 PM

:feels-hot :feels-hot

VideoVoyeur 04-06-2004 09:12 PM

Old pictures, its a girl in Denark who was visiting England, her boyfriend dared her to strip in the pool in front of some castle ( dont know which one) and she did it. It made world news, they were in 10th grade.


Next.

psyko514 04-06-2004 09:12 PM

that's pretty damn fucked up.

emmanuelle 04-07-2004 06:15 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by VideoVoyeur
Old pictures, its a girl in Denark who was visiting England, her boyfriend dared her to strip in the pool in front of some castle ( dont know which one) and she did it. It made world news, they were in 10th grade.


Next.


Does that make it ok to use in adult site promotion?

DR_PHIL 04-07-2004 06:30 AM

dumb fucker

EddiePulp 04-07-2004 06:31 AM

that shit is fucked.. not cool

Pornopat 04-07-2004 06:33 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by VideoVoyeur
Old pictures, its a girl in Denark who was visiting England, her boyfriend dared her to strip in the pool in front of some castle ( dont know which one) and she did it. It made world news, they were in 10th grade.


Next.

10th grade? How old is she?

BillyHoe 04-07-2004 09:11 PM

what a fuck nut.

zentz 04-07-2004 11:09 PM

maybe she is 18

GeorgeJetson 04-07-2004 11:14 PM

The holier than thou... I can't believe you would talk to anyone 2 weeks before their 18th birthday but obviously we'll all pounce like hell on them the day after it... crowd really amuses me. Please, quit with all the moral condescension and come back to the reality that purely for legal reasons, no one wants to cross that line and force Ashhahahahaha to open a can of whoop ass.

stev0 04-07-2004 11:18 PM

that's some shaky legal ground there... the pics aren't sexually explicit, so technically the 2257 wouldn't apply. Still I wouldn't touch that with a 10 foot pole... there's enough legal content out there for cheap, chances are this content is stolen anyways.

Strife 04-07-2004 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by stev0
that's some shaky legal ground there... the pics aren't sexually explicit, so technically the 2257 wouldn't apply. Still I wouldn't touch that with a 10 foot pole... there's enough legal content out there for cheap, chances are this content is stolen anyways.
I agree...it's not clear cut CP but still very questionable

Dugmor 04-07-2004 11:34 PM

Stupid fu*ks !

They should have used an infared cam for that shoot !

Creative 04-07-2004 11:35 PM

http://www.voyeurrealm.com/cgi-bin/click.cgi?id=ronn333

REPORT HIS ASS

mailman 04-07-2004 11:36 PM

defently fucked up looks like the guy shoot it himself the girl is totaly not old enough and as for the little kids.. not good for biz!

TheSenator 04-07-2004 11:41 PM

Lets keep the government out of this....

We can handle this....
1) Send email to webmaster
2) Send email to sponsor
3) Send email to webhost

I don't want big government watching over us constantly.

The Internet can police itself.

Easton 04-08-2004 12:20 AM

well legally speaking, it's all NN... but it's still not worth the risk

bad move on their part indeed


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123