Quote:
Originally posted by Mr.Fiction
You right wing idiots who think there is no difference between Democrats and Republicans when it comes to porn prosecutions better read this article and learn the truth.
Vote Democrat and save yourself from prison.
|
Oh I'm not voting Democratic just because of this issue. To me it makes no difference as both parties screw up although at diffrent ends of the spectrum.
My beef is only on the way the problem is being handled. Porn has been around since the dawn of time. So has war, drugs, stupidity. Yet the proper way to handle it is through education not vindictive strategies. If the feds would educate people as to the hazards, if any, they would gain that foothold they're looking for.
Yet 'what' are they looking for?
Is it to protect people from 'evil porn peddlers' or is it to use that as a platform for deciding what the public can and can't say?
We've seen how far this has gone overboard on several historic occasions most recently the Janet Jackson debacle. Even now the same people who pushed for the fines are backing down as they know it was wrong and set far too many precedents on constitutional rights infringements.
What about adult material is offensive and dangerous? Does it depend on what disgusts someone or is it because if practiced it would lead to injuries?
They've got to draw a fine line here and just communicate with the adult industry and just up and say "Hey, we have a problem with this or that, can you guys try this or that etc. "
You'ld be suprised how far just sitting down and chatting will do.
On the other hand what about those people who got into the business as a last resort to pay catastrophic health bills or student loans and other suppressive financial burdens that are the result from negligence from our own government who let things get out of hand in the first place? I don't see a commission to put an end to stupidly high health care or ridiculous student loans or outrageous credit card and mortgage payments. Know why? Because it's another way of ripping off the public by major contributors to these politically motivated law enforcement programs. That's why.
There're far more dangerous things facing humanity than looking at pixelated pussy.
If the feds tried a blanket attack like the article suggests it would lead to counter lawsuits so enormous it would break the country. Too many nebulous areas and gray areas that would put far too much a liability on our judicial system.
The resolution is easy. Just sit down and talk it out. Team up to get rid of the spammers, identity theives, etc. That would streamline the industry so that we could put an end to this foolishness. That would send shockwaves to foreign elements outside of the jurisdiction of the U.S. who are doing the wrong thing. Work with ISPs etc. and get things done right.
I'm happy the controversy is in the news because I got into this business as a protest and what I predicted came to pass.
I've had to spend my entire adult life fighting crime. Too much. Yet when we would complain we were ignored and gangsters just flourished. Now the feds are pissed at porn? I wish they would cause I have a ton of hahahahahahahahas and cases I'ld sure like them to answer as to why they sat on their asses during 7 administrations and why porn is so important when these atrocities have occured and constantly avoided. Even today.
