![]() |
Questions about domain names
If someone has a domain name that is parked (not actually in use) and one uses a derivative of that name ie...
freemaps.com (just as an example is parked and lets say was registered in '99...I actually do not know anything about this domain name.) Is one safe in using... 1stfreemaps.com assuming that freemaps.com is parked Does being parked have any bearing upon the matter or does any derivative of freemaps.com open one up for legal problems? Answers from the knowledgeable please? |
depends on the name.
if its a brand - you cant use it. |
stop talking about your domain as a 'derivative' of the other.
this is what you are saying: "my domain is completely different. any resemblance to the other domain is sheer coincidence. there is no trademark violation." |
There is always risk, whether parked or in use, parked seems safer though...
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If what he is saying is true then a domain name that held the word maps...as in my example...would open one up for a lawsuit. I find it difficult to believe that the use of a same word...ie the word exchange...in a domain name can open one up for a lawsuit but some claim that this is the case. In other words I find it difficult to believe that if a domain name resembles another in any way (ie certain words)...even if they are dealing in the same "product" that one can be sued or forced to give up the domain name...but some claim this to be the case. If this is the case why do domain registrars sell derivitives of registered domain names? Does anyone know of a link that explains the legalities of domain names. |
To put it a little closer to home another example would be...
adult.com 1stadult.com |
you are dumb.
just needed to get that out of the way. the answer to your question is simple. a parked page isnt a business that's up and running.....the hun has been up and running for years and has an actual name to protect. other than that, the other guys were right....if it's trademarked stay away from it. |
Quote:
no, you cant trademark word "adult" |
Putting 1st in front of it shuold be safe... unless someone has 'adult' TRADEMARKED for porn use and you are going to use it for porn. (1stadult.com)
Hun, Pepsi. coke etc are trademarked names. So they can come after you in certain instances. theHun canNOT come after you if you use 'hun' in a domain AND you are not using it for anything related to adult etc. Pepsi etc CAN come after you for the simple reason.. they have a whole different set of defs... and they offer a tangible product. Its kind of hard to explain. But thats the gist if it. |
Quote:
Why then wouldn't it be the case that 1stthehun.com cannot be used...according to the hun. As how could the word "the" and a historical word "hun" be trademarked. |
Quote:
|
:helpme
|
Quote:
oh, and adult is a general word......thehun is not. |
Quote:
Bingo. |
Quote:
BTW what is your resume of expertise pertaining to the legalities of the use of domain names? |
Quote:
i can read fucktard. |
Quote:
but If I was him I would say the same thing. |
The issue is not about domain names but about brand names in general.
You have to be careful. Check for other trademarks before deciding on your name. Make sure you are clear unless you have the money to fight. an average IP lawsuit in the U.S will run you about 1.5 millions, and that's BEFORE the judge rule. My advice.. do your best to find the info yourself and then consult with your attorney. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
http://ecommerce.wipo.int/domains/
Anyone who takes u to court over a domain name is retarded unless they want to get a pile of damages, which is probably a stretch. WIPO is almost always the first stop, it will only cost them $1500 and if they have a good case they will win. If you lose all you lose is the domain it costs you zip. I've lost a few times :) |
Quote:
I went to court on a TM case few years ago. Before the first hearing I already spent 20k. Needless to say, the other company was a billion dollar co. and I realized there's no point fighting anymore, and we settled. They got what they wanted. For me, 20k was allot. For them, this was probably just another fun day in court. |
|
Quote:
yes, im a highly qualified copyright lawyer hanging around gfy to answer dumb questions from the likes of you. get real. obviously im more qualified than you though since i read and understood. but if you do have anymore questions i'd be happy to answer them, and i'll do my best to keep the smartass remarks to a minimum. :glugglug |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
[QUOTE]Originally posted by sacX
[B]http://ecommerce.wipo.int/domains/ http://ecommerce.wipo.int/domains/ sorry link was broken. |
[QUOTE]Originally posted by sacX
[B] Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:31 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123