Is it wrong that the underage chick in American Beauty gives me a boner?
 

And that I've watched her topless scene on the DVD about 100 times?

Also saw the movie 3 times in the theater because of that scene.

how old is she really?

get a checkup from the neck up. :2 cents:

:1orglaugh

she's not underage

Date of birth (location)
9 February 1979

the movie was made in 1999

approx 20 years old then

Thora Birch was, I believe, 16 when the movie was made.

She is not underage.

Here's some dude's rant about the movie:

http://home.earthlink.net/~joeythorne/ambeauty.htm

Thora Birch

Date of birth (location)
11 March 1982

I'm not talking about that nasty Mena Suvari skank. She was 19 or 20 when the movie was filmed.

Go stalk her and find out.

If she's too young, you'll meet her daddy.

If not, you knock the tiny boyfriend out.

She's legal now. That movie is about 5 years old.

I love how you guys think you know everything. Thora Birch was underage for her topless scene in that movie. She had to get written consent from her parents to shoot it.

I'm a red blooded male so of course I enjoy seeing a nice pair of breasts :Graucho ... but I still wonder why the nudity (from both girls) was absolutely necessary in that movie. I don't think it would have changed it one bit if the shots were more obscure, or even deleted.

I thought it was Mena Suvari we were talking about

Well, I wouldn't have paid to see it three time or bought the DVD, I can tell you that much. :P

Nope. I said UNDERAGE. Pay attention. Thora Birch.

It's not right :feels-hot

It's not your fault. It's natural, which is,
by the way, part of growing up (wtf?)

If you really thought it was wrong, I dont think that you'd bring this up on a public forum.

she's far from underage...

hmm I don't really get a boner from that but that was one of my favorite movies. If it offends anyone it is good to me. It definitley offended this guy :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

mena suvaris tits sure were disappointing

definatly not underage, which one of the topless scenes are you referring to? i didnt think much of either, but i thought the movie was one of the best films i have ever seen.

One of them was under 18 but had her parents permission I thought?

Go ahead and fantasize.

Morally yes, but hey you can't control bodily fluids :winkwink:

you're so right.. Thora Birch was awesome in that, infinitely more arousing than Mena.. Also who gives a fuck whether she was 16/17 in the movie, her breasts were bigger then at 16/17 than my girlfriend's now at 25... age has nothing to do with it, a well developed 15 year old can be more naturally sexually attractive than an unendowed 20 year old. The salient factor is that it's not undeveloped 10 year olds that give you wood. Pedo's DO NOT find teenagers attractive, especially not well developed ones.

http://homepage.ntlworld.com/mark.ll...ra_birch10.jpg

men will always find large breasts and small waists attractive.. not only that.. it's a healthy attraction.

I think it would be wrong if it DIDN'T give you a boner.

I think the most sad thing is that you watched it 3 times at the cinemas just for that scene.

She has big tits, as far as the hard on I think you're straight.

nice boobies ! :Graucho

so if you're under 18, you can pose nude provided you get your parents' permission?

Umm. Wouldn't that be child pornography?

no, the nudity has to have "artistic merit" which the movie does as opposed to thowing up sperm in a gagging porno.

haha... i wasn't referring to hardcore pornography. i was referring to nude modelling :)

i forgot about the "artistic merit" loophole though. as far as i know, it was abolished in Canada.

It's only natural to feel that way.
Nothing wrong with it.

I can't believe you guys are asking these questions as supposed adult webmasters, no offence intended but you need to read up.

Kevin Spacey made me wet in that movie :winkwink: something about him.......i dunno.....maybe it was his "I dont give a flying fuck" attitude :glugglug

I was probably trying to make too much of a graphic point, but it includes nude modelling.
It does depend on where you are, but I assume we're talking the states here, also i don't recall it being banned anywhere so..

yeah artisitc merit.. as well as the context of the nudity and the artwork as a whole - ie the 10 seconds of boobs in 2 hours of movie.

You CAN shoot a 16 year old girl naked. BUT. but but. it HAS TO BE NON-SEXUAL and yes proper legal consent from guardians etc etc. It's kind of how naked baby photos of you in the bath aren't porn. as long as it isn't overtly sexual, there is no open legs, genitals, touching, holding breasts etc and it's done as "Art" the kind of thing you'd hang in a gallery, not make into a tgp gallery.
It technically should be legally ok depending on the amount of money you have saved up for lawyers to prove it's legal.

interesting how 10 seconds of underage breasts = millions of dollars in revenue

I guess. I didn't know anything about nudity when I went to see it. But yes I do get your point, however it wouldn't stand up in a court of law.

I went with three different girls, it's not like I was there alone jerking off. Hahaha. I can't stand going to a movie alone.

I actually didn't know Thora Birch was underage until like a year after I saw it. I just thought she was HOT.

It seems I'm not the only one that didn't know by all the clueless replies to this thread stating that she wasn't underage. She definitely was.

Yeah she was nice :thumbsup

This girl is ugly as shit ! What the hell !

Correct. She was 16 when it was filmed and 17 when it was released.

http://www.screensavershot.com/persons2/thora.jpg