R.Kelly charged DROPPED... NOT a Pedo
 

or at least according to the court's he aint...

http://us.cnn.com/2004/SHOWBIZ/Music....ap/index.html

did u get my icq?

still has 14 more in charges in Chicago:Graucho

no i didnt, hit me up now pls? or copy and paste it, i never miss an icq msg

does he? heh i wasnt aware of those

The 37-year-old Kelly -- whose real name is Robert Sylvester Kelly -- still faces 14 child pornography charges in Chicago and has pleaded innocent.

that should be sufficient

[email protected] :)

I think he's a sicko, but when mommas parade their 14 year olds over to his hotel IN HOPES that he might make them the next Aliyah (who he also slept with as a minor) the momma's need a beating along with him.

One momma said something to the effect that "i should have been the one to go up and have sex with him"

This is yet more F'd up shit.

AMEN AMEN AMEN AMEN

you might wanna read the article again...charges being dropped doesn't mean he wasn't guilty...the judge just ruled the pictures were seized illegaly and couldn't be used...just another fuck up by cops who push to hard to close the case.

R. Pedo Kelly ... fucked the underaged judge.... :1orglaugh

thank you eroswebmater -

http://www.cnn.com/2004/SHOWBIZ/Musi....ap/index.html

"The decision followed a judge's ruling last week that detectives illegally seized photographs allegedly showing the singer having sex with an underage girl, meaning they could not be used against him."



They had pictures of him fucking her - he IS a pedo!!!

- the cops fucked up

hmz that sucks

bump :glugglug

The Law is so fucking stupid... you can have a video of the guy killing another... but if the video was taken without a warrant... and thats your only evidence.. the guy will be found not guilty... put back in society and might kill others...

The guy/cop that got the vid without the warrant should be penalized, a fine, or whatever... but to throw out the evidence!? LOL Who's the dumbass behind that rule!? LOL

The decision followed a judge's ruling last week that detectives illegally seized photographs allegedly showing the singer having sex with an underage girl,

he still is, they just cant lock him away for it

No the law is not stupid...cops who don't follow the law are...as well as people who don't understand the basic principles of the American Constitution << only directed to Americans

i sent you money like 5 hours ago bro

I love R Kelly, but he is going to have a hard time fighting off these charges. Its no secret he likes his girls young and it was just a matter of time before it bit him in the ass.

good for him, but he still slept with the girls.

technicalities

the second set of charges were dropped because the evidence was obtained illegally...

i believe he is still facing more charges in another state.

he is not off yet

:Graucho

sorry.. you didnt convince nobody with that "explanation/argument".... try again...

(like I said.. penalize the cop... not the victim or the population)

It seems a shame that eleged pictures of sex acts between him and a child cannot be admitted to court.

The camera was wrapped in a towel in a sports bag somewhere they didn't have a warrent to search:(

No, the cops followed all of the rules.
They had a search warrent signed by a judge.
Every day rapist, robbers and murders get off because some left wing judge plays god..

:(

Or because some right wing judge plays god...

judges and lawyers - work the arcane and out of date legal system, until it boils down to this - if you can afford a better snake, you get off

You'll be telling me Michael Jackson will get off next:(

Bullshit, he is still a pedo.
:BangBang: