Bush doesn't have the balls ...
 

to take it to the fucking Iranians. They're the ones with shit over there, not Iraq. They're shoving us around like a little bitch but he doesn't have the balls to take it to those fuckers. How about a shock and awe on those bitches, I'm down for that, I would rather that, than Iraq anyday. Kerry doesn't have the balls to do it either for those of you that actually think either one of these dumbasses is worth shit.

Being in two countries is enough. Me thinks if we must have war after war at least only have enough wars so they dont try to reinstate the draft.. im not gonna die for Bush -_-

Yes, just what he needs to get re-elected another enemy to invade.

Don't worry he won't do it, Iran is one of the ones that really needs invaded, unlike Iraq.

And don't think they forgot about WW2 :2 cents:

What about Saudi Arabia?

They gave birth to the terrorists who attacked the United States, not Iraq.

Bush is a pussy! :1orglaugh

FUCK BUSH

Saudia Arabia would be #1 on my list if I was president but Bush's father is owned by the Saudi's.

That's not a good idea. First of all the Saudi government is friendly and second you would have every muslim in the world declare jihad on us. :2 cents:

Are you kidding me the Saudi government is friendly? No way, they are the biggest supporter of terrorism in the whole world. They are in it for nothing but money, they play both sides for their own safety to stay in power and keep their hands on the money. You just wait until the king dies and the two sides of the family go at it for power and then you'll see what Bin Laden really has planned for the world.

I'm sure they are prepped for civil war with one side probably in league with the Jihadis but they are 'technically' friendly and it would severely hurt diplomacy to do anything like what's being suggested in this thread..

....to totally stop terrorism.

Problem is the way they're fighting the war on terror is like fighting a hydra with a dull sword, or worse like fighting the war on drugs, that was some glorious success..

The way it's setup right now a few of the top members of the Saudi royal family are split, half of them support radical Islam and Bin Laden and give him aid, the other half are pro US for the money. The pro US half controls the national military and the highest ranking member of the pro radical islam half controls the national guard. Well the word is that the National Guard has been built up with more modern weaponry and equiptment and also now larger than the military. So as soon as the king dies, it's on.

If this is true..then why don't we invade Saudi Arabia instead of Iran? Oh heck..why not do them both? Shit..while we're at it, let's take over EVERY Islamic nation there is as they obviously could someday be a threat to us?

it is true.. why do you think the 9/11 terrorists were saudi's? they weren't iraqi's and afghans.

I'll give him respect the minute he challenges China... now that takes some balls. :2 cents:

challenging China is not a good idea...WWIII is not really what we need.

muhammad atta was trained in iraq

Does Bush have "uberhaupt" balls? :Graucho ... i thought i was a harem keeper :winkwink:

Yeah we all know he don't have balls and that he is an idiot....