Which version is better?
 

This is a gay site so I'll be the first to get my "that's gay!" comment in. :glugglug

But which do you prefer?

http://www.hornybritishboys.com/1/?CF=Y
or
http://www.hornybritishboys.com/2/?CF=Y

It's just the design and text you're looking at - the links don't work. Both pages are very similar but I'm not sure which will convert better.

We could run both and compare conversions, but I thought I'd get some feedback first.

So, what do you guys think? Which is better, and why? Do you like parts of one and parts of the other? I could re-do a fusion of all the best bits...

not much difference but number 2 gets my vote

Thanks. What do you prefer about it?

Number 2 gets my vote too. Description is a little better I think, althought I haven't heard anyone say they're tired of those "american twink" sites... LOL

At least I haven't had any complaints about the american twinks I shoot :)

Is that your stuff at studiocontent.com? It looks great.

Some American stuff is cool, but I think people in the UK prefer seeing twinks from the UK. Local fashions, local names. There's also something extra horny about seeing guys on the site who you saw in a nightclub last week.

Version 2 is the current version anyway. I spent last night re-designing it to create version 1, but I guess should have gone out instead! :)