GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Legality of 'celebrity' content (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=244041)

Glass Fantasy 02-27-2004 07:12 PM

Legality of 'celebrity' content
 
What is the situation with using celebrity photos and doctoring to make profit? Is it even legal?

alecb 02-27-2004 07:14 PM

doctoring is what will get you in the most trouble, altering or modifying material you know is copyrighted will get you in trouble with the Feds (and not only civil stuff) via the DMCA, but thats as much as i know

-alec

schiz 02-27-2004 07:14 PM

See Perfect 10 vs. Cybernet Ventures

bdld 02-27-2004 07:15 PM

even if it might be technically legal i wouldnt touch it

stev0 02-27-2004 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by schiz
See Perfect 10 vs. Cybernet Ventures
isn't cybernet ventures adultcheck?

schiz 02-27-2004 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by stev0


isn't cybernet ventures adultcheck?

Yes.

powerbubba 02-27-2004 08:15 PM

I'm curious about this as well. Anyone have more detailed info? Apparently there's something legal going on because so many sites openly have this stuff.

MrBone 02-27-2004 11:02 PM

It is illegal. Period.

Can't use the pics (altered or not) and can't use anything close to the name. You will get sued - or at least threatened - and you will lose.

Why? Too many other profitable - albeit "hard working" avenues to take.

:2 cents:

hoe_vender 02-27-2004 11:12 PM

too risky

D-Money 02-27-2004 11:14 PM

Sign up with http://www.XPays.com (good advise when no referer code is given)

They have the legal Paris Hilton video in their affiliate program.

ibuydomains 02-27-2004 11:14 PM

as long as its for "newsworthy purposes" like mrskin, you're fine

tbabe 02-27-2004 11:16 PM

Ya, mr skin operates under fair use laws, if you plan on doing that, see a lawyer first.

alecb 02-27-2004 11:23 PM

"In its most general sense, a fair use is any copying of copyrighted material done for a limited and "transformative" purpose such as to comment upon, criticize or parody a copyrighted work. Such uses can be done without permission from the copyright owner. Another way of putting this is that fair use is a defense against infringement. If your use qualifies under the definition above, and as defined more specifically later in this chapter, then your use would not be considered an illegal infringement."

It's not illegal -- period. Check out the facts at the Stanfard Fair Use site -- lots of good information.

-alec

ps. I have never heard of anyone getting sued -- the one exception being Perfect 10 because people used their images to make fake nudes of celebrities. Does anyone have any verification for what theyve said?

Mutt 02-27-2004 11:48 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by tbabe
Ya, mr skin operates under fair use laws, if you plan on doing that, see a lawyer first.
does Mr. Skin publish celeb photos other than screencaps from the movies he reviews?

there is no 'fair use' when it comes to publishing a photograph owned by somebody else. A photographer or photo service couldn't make a living if just because a person or event was famous and newsworthy that made it ok to publish their photos without being paid or permission being granted.

i have no idea what's inside Mr. Skin.

Shagpipe 02-28-2004 01:21 AM

Yeah, Pictures are out of the question. Unless your capping. The only pictures mr.skin posts are caps. Movie clips with some sort of review or comment seem to be the loophole.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:54 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123