SexPed's defense is the images didn't contain sexual acts
 

HEY PEDO

THEY WERE UNDERAGE

THEY WERE NOT CLOTHED

YOU ARE A PEDOPHILE

PLEASE DIE

Good for you OOOOH moral one.
Make sure you report Pamper commercials on HBO.

Do you think its okay for you to have minors posing nude on your website?

SexEducation aka MasterBlogger - Time to tell us why you had CP on your site

This is not a direct link to the CP you had on SexEd, it is safe to click it. It's a snapshot of what was inside the folder " /private/sexeducation_com/graphics_sexeducation_com/ch*deleted*ld_pornography/ " at sexeducation.com

If you click on the links at archive.org, you will see what those pics contained. Not safe to click on, contains underage nudity.

http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://sexeducation.com/private/sexeducation_com/graphics_sexeducation_com/child_pornography/*

Courtesy of archive.org

Can you explain why you had CP pics on sexeducation.com?

Wonder if he'll ever "GET THE FUCKING POINT??" ...

hahaha... Listen to all the fiddle music! :P

no sexual acts? Where's the fun in that!

But seriously; kill yourself!

edit: shite I forgot the s!!

Isn't it just lovely? :glugglug

OMG ... you've reported "Pampers" too ...
Like I've said before ...the adult industry continues to sodomize itself.

FUCK Pampers ...those pedophiles showing underage minors.

*pluck pluck pluck*

Bow to the power of a master music maker.

Wonder when the grande finale comes? :glugglug

So the graphics you guys purport - I am assuming do NOT have partner sex activity.

So what is the text description of these graphics then??

thing is, Pampers never shows nudity

and pampers owners don't have a brain disfunction that makes them lust for children

stop lying to yourself and seek psychiatric help immediately

That's the sound of FIDDLE MUSIC!

Can you hear it, Fiddle boy? Does it make you want to dance?

You owe me an appolgy - right?

You're incorrect. Photographing an underage girl nude is not illegal if she is not in some sort of sexual pose or act.

Take a look at Jock Sturges' books, available at ANY Barnes and Noble:

http://search.barnesandnoble.com/boo...815381& itm=2

It is not a very good idea for a pornographer to be anywhere NEAR underage girls, though. Even if the images ARE innocent. BAD, BAD idea.

Wonder what the disorder is.

Want that I should pluck another string?

right? Got any kids yourself?

The girls in question are in a sexual pose.

For the record:

UNNAMED ICQ CONTACT (05:36 PM) :
You DO realize that Masterblogger aka sexed ACTUALLY IS a sexual predator

UNNAMED ICQ CONTACT (05:36 PM) :
and had full fledged child pornography on his site

UNNAMED ICQ CONTACT (05:36 PM) :
including images of children performing fellatio?

UNNAMED ICQ CONTACT (05:37 PM) :
And some of his articles include stuff about the nipples of 15 year old girls, and how to find children for sex in foreign countries

DonovanPhillips (05:37 PM) :
No, I did not know that. I am simply saying minors nude is not a crime if they're not performing a sex act or posing sexually. I was not sticking up for him.

I think the main question is where did he get the images from? Were they from a set of legal non-sexual images, or were they select "tame" images from a CP producer?

Does SexEducation.com know the origin of those photos?

Whoa he had pics of minors performing fellatio? That's a whole dif ballgame. I've never known the legalities of pics of underage people, so I never really got into these threads about him, but I'd assume www.sexeducation.com would be an informative site where such pictures would be allowed to be shown for educational purposes?