![]() |
difference between a cj2 and tgp
Maybe its just me, and maybe i'm newer than i ever thought...but what the hell is a cj2?
|
yes
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
damnit
|
cj2 can have a clean exit console
tgp can't have a console |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Sorry my mistake. I forget about all the people running CJ sites that like to call themselves TGP owners :1orglaugh |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
this was the standard set a long time ago, when I actually had some CJ2 sites. If it has morphed into something else, please forgive me - and enlighten us. Since you bring nothing but smack :321GFY |
So whats a TGP called if it has popups?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Whatever CJ2 started as it's kinda irrelevant now. I would agree with Steve for the most part. I define a CJ2 as a site with content just like a TGP but usually with a higher frequency of redirects and an exit console/circle jerk.
It really does not matter though considering everyone calls themselves what they want. CJ sites with 0 content call themselves TGP's and whatnot. The definition of anything is the popular concensus and it seems like the adult webmaster community does not like making these. |
My rule of thumb has always been if it uses a trade script and skims gallery clicks, it's a CJ2. If not, it's a TGP. Of course now what everyone considers TGPs use trade scripts and skim like hell.
|
ok, so correct me if i'm wrong,
tgp2 is a page set up like a tgp except that it just uses a cycle of hosted/archived galleries right? |
Quote:
|
CTR are better with tgp2 than tgp too :thumbsup even though the traffic isn't quite the same
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If you use any skim or blind link of your gallery page, your a CJ2 site. If 100% (no skim) of the links go to where it say it will, it's a TGP site. |
CJ2 means NO CONTENT... i think
|
Quote:
jDoG |
so if 50% of the links are straight to galleries, and the other 50% go to trades, it's a TGP?
c'mon, you have to judge each site on it's own merit. You can have nice skim sites, and complete crap no-skim sites. Hell, you might find a sweet ass thumb preview that is way more productive that a no-skim text site. But thumbs would make it a cj type site, by this logic. |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:58 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123