The world gets porn wrong, again
 

Isn't it interesting how these reporters use 'porn' to sell their articles but never bother actually doing any research?

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/08/bu...ey/08porn.html

"THOUSANDS of Web sites are putting Playboy magazine's pictures on the Internet - free. And Randy Nicolau, the president of Playboy.com, is loving it. "It's direct marketing at its finest," he said."

:disgust

you have to register to read the article? boo

nytimes sucks

boring.

hustler and perfect 10 bitching about websites stealing their shit

playboy seeing it as an opportunity to get people to subscribe

porn websites alternately complaining and seeing beasties like kazaa as opportunities

yadda yadda music industry is stupid porn is smart because we make money yadda yadda

Yeah, I think you're right! :BangBang:

do not post smiley faces to increase your postcount

:)

How about quotes then? :1orglaugh

Here's a link so you dont have to register:

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/08/business/yourmoney/08porn.html?ex=1076821200&en=ac755bab028ea832&ei=5 062&partner=GOOGLE

I <3 Google.