17 teen year old model
 

17 teen year old model

I have been chatting to someone about doing a shoot (fully clothed but in a j-string) with a 17 year old model.

She has her mums permission, and her mum will be at the shoot.

I will not be doing the shoot. And have nothing to do with the site or shoot in any way.

I myself feel even clothed, not to bother till she turns 18.

How would others feel about promoting a nonnude site with 17 year old models?

Here it comes...

maybe you can get the mom to get nekkid!

is it actually possible youre getting even DUMBER?

Run away as fast as you can!!!

Wait a year from now.




Then I'll quiz you on the spelling of G-String
Go study now.

You asked for what's coming now...

I personally believe if there is any sexual posing then the model should be 18. I think a lot of other people feel the same way.

Mom being present means shit all. The mom might take some of the money.

Cheers,
Matt

That's all I need to know to tell me that you are an idiot.

Thank you for playing. :321GFY

Uhh the fact that you're bringing the issue up on an Adult Board while obviously being involved in the industry ... well, it doesn't appear like you're into "art" or "fashion".

I wouldn't go there.

what is a J string?

If you think it's wrong... Why the hell do you ask?

What he said

What is a j-string?

I'd fuck a 17 year old :Graucho

ehm, I think the proper term is G-String?

Just wait till she's 18 yo....

Just to make it clear, I have no connection with the model, site or shoot.

This was a conversation with a webmaster and me a bit back.

I agree with most of you, I would not use any model till she is 18.

By the way, it is legal in the UK for a 16/17 year old to do adult work with permission from a parent.

Um...that's not quite true.

lets all move to the UK!

Not quite. I think they can only do topless, but I dunno the specifics.

Not worth it.

Without digging out the exact wording it's along the lines of non-sexual if that makes any sense. So they can look sexy and topless but couldn't for example suck on a lolipop in a suggestive manner at the same time. Both the sun and sport used to be proud of the 16/17 yr old first timers although if you've noticed they tend to use mainly 18yr olds now...

Moot point though. Given the global nature of the Internet it'd be plain dumb to publish naked or semi-naked pics of under 18's no matter how legal it is in your current location.

theres hundreds of non nude under 18 sites out there. thats the problem. theres a fine line between pedo or not so becareful. i'd wait til 18

Wait till she's 18 :)

How anyone can call a 17 year old girl naked a pedo site is beyond me. They are normally fucking like crazy at that age.

The Sun used to have topless 16-17 year olds in the paper every day. I remember the Sport having a countdown to when Lindsey Dawn MacKenzie turned 16 so they could have a load of pics of her with her tits out. She wa sin th paper at 15 years and 360 days, removing one item of clothing at a time! On her 16th birthday out came the hooters!

In the Uk it is leagl to do topless work with parents consent, but no snatch shots. But to be honest whats the point in it? Best to wait till the girl turns 18 then you can cash in and sell the pics to the world.

I think its even younger in Holland where 17 start the girls at 15 or 16 naked and in the mags.

GRENAAAAAAADE!!!!!! :ak47:

Wow...I feel so left out here in Vancouver. Here the legal age is 19 (18 with parent or guardian's written consent).
Ya, ok, what parent or guardian is gonna write a consent letter for their 18 year old daughter to get nekikid in front of a camera for money?....

19 it is...


=)

18 is a standard age as that's the legal age to sign a model release (in the UK).

In my view a girl should not be modelling under 18 as, I feel at 18 she has a better idea of what she wants to do with her life than at 16/17. I have not been happy with a 16/17 going topless in the Sun (the UK paper). As its still a young age when you are not sure of what you wish to do.

Though a site with a 16 year old, is probably not going to attract the 'pedoes', unless of course the girl dressed as a 12 year old, I do feel that it gives pedoes an 'excuse' of sorts. As it would be easy to say "well if its ok to look at a 16 year old, then what difference is two or three years and I look at a 13 year old". As such its sensible to make it 18 for many reasons.

Me and a buddy have the hottest chick available for shoots...she would be huge money maker...but she is 17. Nonnude basically wouldnt be illegal anywhere and certainly not in Holland. Id open her a site any min but theres 1 simple reason i dont...i know i will lose a lot of good contacts and people will call me a pedo and shit.

Im talking about a classy nonnude site with lingerie and stuff...this is totally unaccepted by the adult industry while a chick whos 18th bday is today gets posted here with 2 black cocks in her ass....thats totally cool.

Actualy im stupid for not opening the site cause it would make me a lot but i dont want to get bad publicity and people calling me pedo or child pron peddler.

Don't forget you can get married in the UK at 16. So thats the legal age of consent.

Not sure if the girl was married she would have to ask her husband or parents still.


At the end of the day its always worth waiting until the girl is 18 and you are safe.

Only with parents consent.

16 yr old models in skimpy underwear on the catwalk and aired in 50 countries is totally accepted but a 17 yrd old non nude chick on the net is wrong.

For some reason internet makes people vision on age and child porn and stuff like totally distorded.

VOGUE ,ELLE .... every month models under 18 gets shooted there in sexual positions and seems like no body care..

I would say that this is due to what seems to be an over reaction in both the USA and UK to porn sites and child porn.

At the moment ALL sex offenders are using the net as an excuse "as it inflated there fantasies". Of course there will be 001% of net users who are rapists, but they would be rapist regardless of the net.

As webmasters we have to be careful not to give people an excuse to shut down the net adult business.

17 teen year old? j-string? wtf is going on here im confused

Very true, and these magazines encourage girls to become anorexic too. These magazines probably course women more harm than porn sites. In fact most adult sites show 'real' women are sexy, rather than the skinny girls these magazines show.

But unfortunately, porn is easy to attack.

I get told all the times that the girls are on drugs and desperate for cash? Which is strange as today I have never come across a girl yet on drugs in porn. And most girls I have met or more confident and happy than girls not involved.

But lets face it, its a cheap and easy way for the media to score points by just saying porn.

I meant G-hahahahahahahaha

My post was what others thought of promoting a non nude model site with 17 year old girls in G-strings.

I myself feel its not worth the hassle to promote a site with a 17 year old, but interested to see what others thought.

i fucked her..

its ok.

Pedo.

well i personally don't think a 17 year old should be posing in a g-string in the first place, but i'm sure there are people who would be more than willing to pay to see a 17 year old in a thong

When you do porn, you have to be very carefull.

When you shoot minors, you are not being that.

Every fucking 17 yr old girl on the planet wears a thong nowadays...i dont know about your country but over here 15 yr old girls are topless on the beach wearing a thong.

Once again, why is a 17 yr old girl in a thong wrong but a girl who turned 18 yesterday and now does a 50 guy gangbang is ok?

Well said. I'd much rather see a 17 year old in a non nude shoot than a fresh 18 year old getting fucked by 6 guys after she pukes on their cock to pay the rent.

Right. The people that want to pay to see a 17 year old in a thong are the same ones that want to see an 18 year old in a thong. Pedo's go for the little kids, not someone who looks like an adult.

Leave the kdis alone! It will give these puritan right wing sex starved assholes an excuse...

I agree with that..

People who enjoy that are people who enjoy fully grown women, not kids.

Simple. It gives people a reason to shut down porn sites.

We all have to be careful not to give anyone a reason to shut down sites.

It's all about 18 and nothing less

I agree, there have to be laws and borders but for some reason people think US is the only country where those laws apply. Once again i can open an 17 yr old nonnude model site here and not break any law but still i would be labeled as attracting pedos.

If 17 yr was the legal age in America it would be ok for you guys but since its 18 for you it now is called child pron...