![]() |
Janet banned from Grammys
Janet was set to introduce the Luther Vandross Tribute at the Grammys, but CBS has allegedly retracted the invitation.
rofl:1orglaugh http://www.accesshollywood.com/enter...09/detail.html |
Didn't Guns And Roses drop a dozen F bombs at the Grammys one year? I am surprised they havent used a broadcast delay, like the Howard Stern show.
I'm just sorry I didn't yell out "eye muffs!" a little sooner..... |
Too bad.
I was looking forward to see the other tit.... |
America, the country where everything is bigger and better and where everything is possible. Except a half nude boobie.
|
thats fucked up, i feel bad for janet.
|
Why can't people just "let it go" ?
|
good, fuck that monkey looking bitch, if i have to stare one more time at this "girl" who looks like michael with a bad boob job i will have to puke.
i suggest the jacksons sign a contract with a circus circus because they are nothing short of pure freaks. |
I heard on my local news that she would be allowed on the Grammy's. The "reports" go back and forth. The bottom line is nobody cares.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
That is really too bad. It was not Janet's fault. She didnt design the wardrobe. Why would she want to show her tit anyway?
I feel bad for her but I can understand why CBS would have to do this. They are going to be fined something like 1.7 million for each broudcast channel they own or something like that. |
Quote:
last time i checked a nose job from hell, bad boob job and a tucked in face like michael jackson isnt sexy. i like cute girls not done up plastic pieces, u should stop comparing your toy doll to real women and u may be able to buy a clue. :thumbsup |
:1orglaugh
The Righteous CBS... symbol of decency and class.. the same network that has that Fat Richard Hatch on survivor competing naked in front of 20 helpless and horrified contestants... Arent kids and teens watching survivors!? mmmh... But I guess seeing the shape of Janet Jackson breasts... for 2 sec.. from a distance.. with a star covering the nipple... is SO MUCH worst... lol |
Quote:
She's beautiful. Case Closed. |
Quote:
if i dont like made up girls why on earth would you care? |
Quote:
and I equate that with ugly. |
Awww poor baby :(
|
Janet, like Michael, was beautiful in the 80's:)
|
Quote:
Is Janet gonna give me some pussy because I "defended" her in this thread? No. Do I even KNOW Janet Jackson? No... I was just making commentary. I couldn't give two shits about who you like or dislike. It was just a buzzed moment while I was drinking some Black Velvet and I just made a random post. Carry on. |
Quote:
(note: I'd still hit it) |
Don't believe the very misleading news.
She was supposed to present an award to Luther Vandross, but he is sick and won't be attending. So there is no spot for Janet now, and that is the real reason why she isn't going on the show. It just creates a better news story for the media if they imply she won't be there because of the flashing. |
Quote:
|
I also heard they have a 5 min delay in the broadcast as well as dumping Janet. Crazy
|
Well remembr the Jaime Lee Curtis grope they want to edit out any embarressing moments
|
Quote:
Here in LA, the shop in Hollywood that designed the article of clothing said there was NO MALFUNCTION, it came off as it was supposed to do. Id believe the maker of the outfit before some washed up singer looking to top Brit and Madonnas kiss. I am glad I live in the city where we MAKE THESE LIES the rest of the country, and world believe. Hollywood rules, it has so many of you by the neck its funny. I have also spoken to dancer , and they say there is no way a dancer like Janet or them, would want to have a metal throwing star under her garments, it was planned, and the outfit was designed to do what it did. |
Fuckin double standards .
Now the moralists are trying to get good old values again to the people, just to pretend that there are still some kind of proper merits in our society. But we all know that this is past time, right ?! |
pretty gay to get banned from the grammy's when the super bowl had nothing to do with it.
|
they have nothing else better to do..keep the focus off the kids('soilders') that's getting their caps peeled over in iraq..oh shit we forgot about that right?:321GFY..i'm watching sportscenter and they are showing her taped 'confession' WTF???
|
good
|
CBS dresscode:
http://images.bm4.metropol.dk//119/1...9718_small.jpg |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Right now he is thinging: "ethics -or- viewers, ethics -or- viewers, ethics -or- viewers." |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Fuck the Grammys!
They was kissin' her ass six ways to Sunday when she was rockin' the charts and now they wanna put her in the cheap seats? She has a new CD out next month and you know it's gonna sell off the racks because of the Super Bowl incident. She's a genius and she knew what she was doing. So what, they kicked her off the Grammys well if I was her and her friends and family I would boycott the Grammys and tell em' to kiss the left cheek of my righteous ass. |
Quote:
Nothin' like a sexually repressive genocidal culture to give ya' that warm fuzzy feeling. :) |
Most search on google is now:
Janets breast!:Graucho 60 times more than Hilton |
Quote:
being the #1 search term in internet history must be good |
Quote:
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh |
Quote:
we are already at war globally, so we are half way there. |
Quote:
What's the big deal anyway...isn't the Grammy's where the MaDonna - Brittany kiss took place? |
who cares, my life doesnt revolve 365 days with Janet.. no offense. its just that we heard enough of this already... their show was just bullshit and plain propaganda.
|
Quote:
|
does anybody have a comment as to why Janet was selected for the Superbowl considering the controversy with her family and Michael's child pornography and child molestation headlines...
I know she is not her brother (though they look the same)...everyone in the world and then some know what is going on with Michael and hard to not think of it when you see her. And just days before the superbowl, she is in court defending her bro for getting it on with kids. Unfortunate for her, but she is associated with the name. Hi, I'm Janet and my brother is a child molester but I am not him so it is ok to come perform in front of the world and it's children and grind it up like the 'nasty girl' that I am. Just for the Michael reason alone, what the hell were these execs thinking?? I would not have booked her on the superbowl so the world can be reminded she is a Jackson, that is how I see it. who cares about a fake tit. It's the close association to a child molestor that pisses me off more about choosing her over a hundred other better and more appropriate artists to perform at this type of event. Just one more snapshot for the Jackson family photo album. K, now I am ready to get slammed for this opinion...go ahead.... |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:05 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123