GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Janet banned from Grammys (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=231177)

budz 02-04-2004 07:54 PM

Janet banned from Grammys
 
Janet was set to introduce the Luther Vandross Tribute at the Grammys, but CBS has allegedly retracted the invitation.

rofl:1orglaugh


http://www.accesshollywood.com/enter...09/detail.html

Steve 02-04-2004 07:57 PM

Didn't Guns And Roses drop a dozen F bombs at the Grammys one year? I am surprised they havent used a broadcast delay, like the Howard Stern show.

I'm just sorry I didn't yell out "eye muffs!" a little sooner.....

directfiesta 02-04-2004 07:59 PM

Too bad.

I was looking forward to see the other tit....

Dirty F 02-04-2004 08:01 PM

America, the country where everything is bigger and better and where everything is possible. Except a half nude boobie.

com 02-04-2004 08:03 PM

thats fucked up, i feel bad for janet.

TweetyBird 02-04-2004 08:03 PM

Why can't people just "let it go" ?

MetaMan 02-04-2004 08:05 PM

good, fuck that monkey looking bitch, if i have to stare one more time at this "girl" who looks like michael with a bad boob job i will have to puke.

i suggest the jacksons sign a contract with a circus circus because they are nothing short of pure freaks.

fuelcell 02-04-2004 08:06 PM

I heard on my local news that she would be allowed on the Grammy's. The "reports" go back and forth. The bottom line is nobody cares.

BVF 02-04-2004 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MetaMan
good, fuck that monkey looking bitch, if i have to stare one more time at this "girl" who looks like michael with a bad boob job i will have to puke.

i suggest the jacksons sign a contract with a circus circus because they are nothing shorts of pure freaks.

Janet is beautiful. You couldn't get a female that has even a fraction of the beauty of Janet without paying per hour.

Krome 02-04-2004 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MetaMan
good, fuck that monkey looking bitch, if i have to stare one more time at this "girl" who looks like michael with a bad boob job i will have to puke.

i suggest the jacksons sign a contract with a circus circus because they are nothing shorts of pure freaks.

I couldnt agree more

IntenseCash 02-04-2004 08:07 PM

That is really too bad. It was not Janet's fault. She didnt design the wardrobe. Why would she want to show her tit anyway?

I feel bad for her but I can understand why CBS would have to do this. They are going to be fined something like 1.7 million for each broudcast channel they own or something like that.

MetaMan 02-04-2004 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BVF


Janet is beautiful. You couldn't get a female that has even a fraction of the beauty of Janet without paying per hour.

EXCUSE ME IDIOT, maybe if you didnt spend your time banging up cracked up strippers u would have an idea what real looks are.

last time i checked a nose job from hell, bad boob job and a tucked in face like michael jackson isnt sexy.

i like cute girls not done up plastic pieces, u should stop comparing your toy doll to real women and u may be able to buy a clue. :thumbsup

xxxdesign-net 02-04-2004 08:09 PM

:1orglaugh

The Righteous CBS... symbol of decency and class.. the same network that has that Fat Richard Hatch on survivor competing naked in front of 20 helpless and horrified contestants... Arent kids and teens watching survivors!? mmmh... But I guess seeing the shape of Janet Jackson breasts... for 2 sec.. from a distance.. with a star covering the nipple... is SO MUCH worst... lol

BVF 02-04-2004 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MetaMan

EXCUSE ME IDIOT, maybe if you didnt spend your time banging up cracked up strippers u would have an idea what real looks are.

last time i checked a nose job from hell, bad boob job and a tucked in face like michael jackson isnt sexy.

i like cute girls not done up plastic pieces, u should stop comparing your toy doll to real women and u may be able to buy a clue. :thumbsup

I wish I could fine a cracked up stripper that looked like Janet. I'd build a site around her and people would be saying, "Look at that fool who fucks cracked up strippers.....Driving that Bentley"...

She's beautiful. Case Closed.

MetaMan 02-04-2004 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BVF


I wish I could fine a cracked up stripper that looked like Janet. I'd build a site around her and people would be saying, "Look at that fool who fucks cracked up strippers.....Driving that Bentley"...

She's beautiful. Case Closed.

lol man u r the one who stepped in being a hater trying to defend janet jackson,

if i dont like made up girls why on earth would you care?

JensMoviePost 02-04-2004 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BVF


Janet is beautiful. You couldn't get a female that has even a fraction of the beauty of Janet without paying per hour.

Too much plastic surgery, she looks "fake"
and I equate that with ugly.

Vitasoy 02-04-2004 08:18 PM

Awww poor baby :(

mardigras 02-04-2004 08:28 PM

Janet, like Michael, was beautiful in the 80's:)

BVF 02-04-2004 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MetaMan


lol man u r the one who stepped in being a hater trying to defend janet jackson,

if i dont like made up girls why on earth would you care?

Dude...I DON'T fucking care. If I did, I'd make a big argument with you about this.

Is Janet gonna give me some pussy because I "defended" her in this thread? No.

Do I even KNOW Janet Jackson? No...

I was just making commentary. I couldn't give two shits about who you like or dislike. It was just a buzzed moment while I was drinking some Black Velvet and I just made a random post.

Carry on.

evildick 02-04-2004 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by mardigras
Janet, like Michael, was beautiful in the 80's:)
Ya, I hadn't seen her face in a while. Looks like she's hacked it up pretty good the last few years. She used to look normal, not like a Mr. Plastic Face.

(note: I'd still hit it)

Matt 26z 02-04-2004 10:20 PM

Don't believe the very misleading news.

She was supposed to present an award to Luther Vandross, but he is sick and won't be attending. So there is no spot for Janet now, and that is the real reason why she isn't going on the show.

It just creates a better news story for the media if they imply she won't be there because of the flashing.

TaylorM 02-04-2004 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by directfiesta
Too bad.

I was looking forward to see the other tit....

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

JunkyardDog 02-04-2004 10:22 PM

I also heard they have a 5 min delay in the broadcast as well as dumping Janet. Crazy

lock 02-04-2004 10:24 PM

Well remembr the Jaime Lee Curtis grope they want to edit out any embarressing moments

Fletch XXX 02-04-2004 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by IntenseCash
That is really too bad. It was not Janet's fault. She didnt design the wardrobe. Why would she want to show her tit anyway?

I feel bad for her but I can understand why CBS would have to do this. They are going to be fined something like 1.7 million for each broudcast channel they own or something like that.

Isnt that special.

Here in LA, the shop in Hollywood that designed the article of clothing said there was NO MALFUNCTION, it came off as it was supposed to do. Id believe the maker of the outfit before some washed up singer looking to top Brit and Madonnas kiss.

I am glad I live in the city where we MAKE THESE LIES the rest of the country, and world believe.

Hollywood rules, it has so many of you by the neck its funny.

I have also spoken to dancer , and they say there is no way a dancer like Janet or them, would want to have a metal throwing star under her garments, it was planned, and the outfit was designed to do what it did.

smokincash 02-04-2004 11:22 PM

Fuckin double standards .
Now the moralists are trying to get good old values again to the people, just to pretend that there are still some kind of proper merits in our society. But we all know that this is past time, right ?!

DirtyRider 02-04-2004 11:25 PM

pretty gay to get banned from the grammy's when the super bowl had nothing to do with it.

69pornlinks 02-04-2004 11:30 PM

they have nothing else better to do..keep the focus off the kids('soilders') that's getting their caps peeled over in iraq..oh shit we forgot about that right?:321GFY..i'm watching sportscenter and they are showing her taped 'confession' WTF???

beemk 02-04-2004 11:42 PM

good

Sexzity 02-04-2004 11:44 PM

CBS dresscode:
http://images.bm4.metropol.dk//119/1...9718_small.jpg

andi_germany 02-04-2004 11:50 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sexzity
CBS dresscode:
http://images.bm4.metropol.dk//119/1...9718_small.jpg

I am torn between :1orglaugh and :(

69pornlinks 02-04-2004 11:54 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sexzity
CBS dresscode:
http://images.bm4.metropol.dk//119/1...9718_small.jpg

this is true,but it's sooo subtle here:winkwink:

Sexzity 02-05-2004 12:05 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by andi_germany


I am torn between :1orglaugh and :(

I know the Director of CBS has it the same way.

Right now he is thinging:
"ethics -or- viewers, ethics -or- viewers, ethics -or- viewers."

Nikoleta 02-05-2004 12:17 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by fuelcell
I heard on my local news that she would be allowed on the Grammy's.
I heard the same 5 min ago

Sp1nal 02-05-2004 12:36 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by budz
Janet was set to introduce the Luther Vandross Tribute at the Grammys, but CBS has allegedly retracted the invitation.

rofl:1orglaugh


http://www.accesshollywood.com/enter...09/detail.html

Are they afraid of the nice black boobie sight? :1orglaugh

Greg B 02-05-2004 01:05 AM

Fuck the Grammys!

They was kissin' her ass six ways to Sunday when she was rockin' the charts and now they wanna put her in the cheap seats?

She has a new CD out next month and you know it's gonna sell off the racks because of the Super Bowl incident.

She's a genius and she knew what she was doing. So what, they kicked her off the Grammys well if I was her and her friends and family I would boycott the Grammys and tell em' to kiss the left cheek of my righteous ass.

Greg B 02-05-2004 01:07 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by smokincash
Fuckin double standards .
Now the moralists are trying to get good old values again to the people, just to pretend that there are still some kind of proper merits in our society. But we all know that this is past time, right ?!

You said it smokincash! We oughtta go back to the ways of our ancestors! They knew how to live! No sex and lots and lots of global warfare.

Nothin' like a sexually repressive genocidal culture to give ya' that warm fuzzy feeling. :)

Sexzity 02-05-2004 11:25 AM

Most search on google is now:

Janets breast!:Graucho

60 times more than Hilton

Manowar 02-05-2004 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by com
thats fucked up, i feel bad for janet.
dont, she couldn't buy this kind of publicity.

being the #1 search term in internet history must be good

Hardcore Kay 02-05-2004 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by directfiesta
Too bad.

I was looking forward to see the other tit....


:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Fletch XXX 02-05-2004 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Greg B


We oughtta go back to the ways of our ancestors! They knew how to live! No sex and lots and lots of global warfare.


Is this not what Bush wants?

we are already at war globally, so we are half way there.

sherie 02-05-2004 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Steve
Didn't Guns And Roses drop a dozen F bombs at the Grammys one year? I am surprised they havent used a broadcast delay, like the Howard Stern show.

I'm just sorry I didn't yell out "eye muffs!" a little sooner.....

HAHAHA! Yes they did. Then after that they had a 3 second delay...now because of the JT and JJ incident they are going to have a 7 sec delay....

What's the big deal anyway...isn't the Grammy's where the MaDonna - Brittany kiss took place?

loverboy 02-05-2004 12:42 PM

who cares, my life doesnt revolve 365 days with Janet.. no offense. its just that we heard enough of this already... their show was just bullshit and plain propaganda.

Tuga 02-05-2004 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BVF


Janet is beautiful. You couldn't get a female that has even a fraction of the beauty of Janet without paying per hour.

You're fucking crazy... :1orglaugh

XBizLori 02-05-2004 12:56 PM

does anybody have a comment as to why Janet was selected for the Superbowl considering the controversy with her family and Michael's child pornography and child molestation headlines...

I know she is not her brother (though they look the same)...everyone in the world and then some know what is going on with Michael and hard to not think of it when you see her.
And just days before the superbowl, she is in court defending her bro for getting it on with kids.

Unfortunate for her, but she is associated with the name. Hi, I'm Janet and my brother is a child molester but I am not him so it is ok to come perform in front of the world and it's children and grind it up like the 'nasty girl' that I am.

Just for the Michael reason alone, what the hell were these execs thinking?? I would not have booked her on the superbowl so the world can be reminded she is a Jackson, that is how I see it. who cares about a fake tit. It's the close association to a child molestor that pisses me off more about choosing her over a hundred other better and more appropriate artists to perform at this type of event.

Just one more snapshot for the Jackson family photo album.

K, now I am ready to get slammed for this opinion...go ahead....


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123