Moral dilemma
 

Here's an interesting moral dilemma, imagine the following situation:


You are in Florida, in Miami, to be exact. There is a great chaos going on around you, caused by a hurricane and severe floods. There are huge masses of water all over you. You are a CNN photographer and you are in the middle of this great disaster. The situation is nearly hopeless.
You are trying to shoot very impressive photos. There are houses and people floating around you, disappearing into the water. Nature is showing all its destroying power and is ripping everything away with it.

Suddenly you see a man in the water, he is fighting for his life, trying not to be taken away by the masses of water and mud. You move closer.
Somehow the man looks familiar. Suddenly you know who it is - it's George W. Bush! At the same time you notice that the raging waters are about to take him away, forever.

You have two options. You can save hime or you can take the best photo of your life. So you can save the life of George W. Bush, or you can shoot a Pulitzer prize winning photo, a unique photo displaying the death of one of the world's most powerful men.

And here's the question (please give an honest answer):



Would you select color film, or rather go with the simplicity of classic black and white?

:1orglaugh the simplicity of classic black and white would be best for that photo

That's old.... but funny :1orglaugh

who is George W. Bush anyways

Oldie but a goodie. :1orglaugh

black & white :winkwink:

:thumbsup