Who Do These Jews Think They Are?
 

Just because some fuck doesn't agree with an art exhibit, he can try and destroy it?

Then he is backed by Sharon?

Does this mean I can walk in any museum and try and destroy any piece of art I feel controversial or I deem not worthy of being presented?

Who do these fucking jews think they are?

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...326EST0489.DTL

What a way for an ambassador to act.

Piece of shit.

http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/...israel.sweden/

<img src=http://i.cnn.net/cnn/2004/WORLD/meast/01/18/israel.sweden/story.sweden.ap.jpg border="1">

It was a publicity stunt to get votes i bet you :Graucho

:eek7


no offense but that is an idiotic question
ONE person did that
not "the jews" :2 cents:

how about they make a painting with a picture of your family being raped or slashed and see if you call it art.

are you stupid?

Just bringing it to the attention of those.

I said "these jews" singularly pinning the culprits.

you people can argue about it however you want.

I have organized art exhibits and worked in museums, you cant just deface art no matter what the content.

Ever looked at William Cristenberry art? I worked a few of his exhibits.... get a clue.

Argue amongst yourselves.

:thumbsup

:thumbsup

Art is a different thing all together.

Jesus is crucified in art all the time. :) Explain the difference.

Jews often fight amongst themselves. The American Jews and the Israeli Jews have an attitude towards each other also. Sharon isn't 100% supported by his people. He's considered a war monger by many.

Smashing a perfectly good guitar?

This is GFY get over it

I cannot think of one instance where it is cool to desecrate someone's art no matter how abhorrent it may be.

Shitty art exhibit though.

:2 cents:

I was referring to Sharon calling the guy who did it to congrat him on it.

:thumbsup

i dont agree with art supporting violence or condoning it,

you cannot make a claim and compare it to jesus, christians want paintings of jesus on a cross because it reminds them of a sacrifice.


art is not art, like CP stories and pics are legal, and i dont find that are 1 bit. if you do then you are a freak.

im not gonna discuss this the football game is on, but like i said i dont agree with paintings depicting violence against another race in a totally diff country.

I have seen much worst.

I have w3atched performace art that would offend and most likely gag most of you.

Everything from girls bathing in cow blood, to statues of mary riddled with bullet holes and kkk oufits.

I have organized William Cristenberry exhibits, which is full of KKK artwork from Alamaba artist Cristenberry, i didnt see a bunch of blacks kicking over paintings, and if they did they would have been arrested.

Art is an axpression like any.

No one can just destroy it.

its not right.

These two statements clash greatly with each other

On one hand you say you dont like paintings that depict violence , but on the other hand you claim there are times when it is acceptable.

I dont like jazz , but it doesnt mean im going to throw a loudspeaker at it :)

Fuck Off.

Yeah - I read it in the paper. It pissed me off but that installation is crap. :2 cents:

matter of opinion...and taste of course

You don't say?

:winkwink:

And NO William Cristenberry fdoes not glorify KKK its anti-kkk so before you folks make assumptions on me for being part of the exhibit.

All his work features KKK subliminal mesages and whatnot, even collecting and showing old KKK signs, again, I didnt see any jews or blacks destroying the exhibits.

<img src=http://www.artline.com/plus/services/staley/christenbury.jpg>

I have his books of art, here :

http://www.alabamaarts.org/christenberry.html

Reardless , the exhibit had pro israel and pro-palestine art so its fairly childish to lash out at one without lashing out at another.

Throwing things and wrecking things is stuff that ignorant children do , not adults.

As an ambassador of a country this is the worst possible example you can make for your country.

SHAME on you and your country.

Welcome to Sweden :(

He's an Israeli, not a jew. If an American did that, you wouldn't say "Who do these Christians think they are?"

Oh and the artist of that piece is Israeli to. But like everywhere, they have there bunch of idiots.

Maybe he was making an artistic statement about the artwork.

:1orglaugh

zionism is just as ignorant as christianity, so yes I would.

if a christian came in and tried to destroy an art exhibit, I would.

so, yes.

"Jews" in title = very long thread

Always.

LOL ok wiseguy how bout i make an artistic statement of my foot in your ass :)

Jesus getting killed isnt a dipiction of violence u fucking tool.

christians depict it to remind us of the sacrafice he made,
u need to open your brain and not compare 2 non comparable things.

itd be disrespectful for a mosk to show jesus dieing, just like if a catholic church had alah getting shot in the head.

i dont need to answer these questions you are like arguing with a high school girl.

on a side note, I have been part of exhibits where CHRISTIANS DID SHOW UP IN PROTEST.

and if they would have tried to sabotage an exhibit, they would have been arrested and dealty with, not fucking rewarded by the presiodent of a country.

Sharon supports shit like this and you really think he wants peace?

fuck him and anyone who believes in his bullshit.

Maybe if we do it in a museum as a live performance, you can start and then I can shoot you in the face. Think of a name for it, I'm not feeling that artistic while the football game is on.

:1orglaugh

lets turn the cards.

what would the world say if I set a Martin Luther King tribute exhibit on fire, and George Bush called to CONGRATULATE and THANK ME FOR IT, the way Sharon did his ambassador?

What would happen?

there really isnt a difference.

Is there a pic of the art? I think it's stupid to distroy art; that could have been the artists baddream!

:thumbsup Sharon is a fucking fascist.

Are you serious you fucking brain dead cockflap ?

Jesus getting crucified isnt a depiction of violence ???


HAHAHHA wtf kind of drugs are you smoking son.


Art is interpreted by the viewer not by the creator. :)

I swear to god some people were just born stupid. LOL

Not exactly a valid example, since Israel is known as the "Jewish State".

This is how the artist felt about his work..

------------------------------
Dror Feiler, the Israeli-born artist, maintained that Mazel misunderstood his work. He said the piece was supposed to call attention to how weak, lonely people can be capable of horrible things
-------------------------------

Now tell me again how im comparing apples to oranges dipshit.

i told you im not having an argument, its not gonna get anywhere,

what i was trying to say is you cant compare jesus, Christians want those pictures made.

if you cant get that i give up. this is a pointless argument, go watch some football!

Actually... In Israel %75 of the people Sharon is taking it too easy on the palestines.

I see so now your claiming its ok to show art depicting violence based on religion ONLY if the religion agrees with it collectivly ?

HAHAHAH no wonder you dont want to argue it any further. LOL

Nothing wrong with Jews.... Tons of them in the industry... Always good people...Fair, honest and trust-worthy...

And my football is in a little screen in the corner of my tv right now its called picture in picture :) its right below the cockholster banner :)

What if I make an art laughing about 9-11.... I bet not many people will laugh than...or think its art either.

I said THESE JEWS: referring to Sharon and his ambassador, in case you missed it.

Folks should realize posting on message boards require some level of comprehension and/or reading and writing ability.

Agreed. and I always make a difference between Israelis and " Jews"... Not the same ...
Dissention exist in Israel, but is not well perceived by the religious extremists .. that basically hold power now.

The ambassador was an idiot to take matters " in his own hands" as much as the organizer of the exhibition to displaying a controversial tasteless piece of " art "....

On the other hand, it is true that there will be more waves of blood in that conflict .... so shoud it be hidden?

so what's the symbolism of a pic of a suicide bomber floating in blood?
seems like that's up to interpretation, no? (making it art)

I would hope most people don't consider a "sea of blood"
a positive / proactive / pro-anything message.

Or even throw a loud speaker at it :)

But seriously the artist wasnt trying to make fun of death he was trying to show the futility of death. Theres a bit of a difference. Also art is art no matter what it is. Where someone may choose to display it , is another matter.

But no matter what happens we dont throw stuff at art , we leave or walk away or tell people why you dont like it, but you DONT act like a child and throw stuff at it. :)

So CP is art too?
Many people claim it to be. Does that make it right?

I think this thread might be a little too grown up for you.

So you would expect a US diplomat to trash such a painting (of 9/11) and to be publicly supported in this act of vandalism by Bush?