rachel hunter to pose topless for 1.5mil
 

pics?

again? Or are you talking about the same deal as last week?

:thumbsup

"She first refused to pose nude for the mag at 17 because she was too young."

Huh? Playboy offered when she was 17?

Vegas, you should change your name to "newsman".

http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...achel +hunter

http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...achel +hunter

old news.

Egads...Pay her a million to keep her top on

Seems a stupid amount of money

Vegas2004 dude keeps posting old news...dont have a clue why.
Yesterday he posted the pic of saddam that was taken at his capture. The whole world has seen that pic 30 times already 3 weeks ago but i guess he likes to remind us again of things that happened.

well i'm not gonna run right out for that magazine just 'cause she's in it. there are bound to be lots of better looking NAKED women in it (which is why i will run right out and buy it :winkwink: )

She never did that much for me, there were always so many hotter models imo. And how old is she now?

um, 34

34...Yea shes ok but to pose topless for a million? Somebody has a hardon for her

Ahhh, I guess I thought she was older because she married Rod Stewart.