GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Watching Bush on CNN is painful. (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=219968)

<IMX> 01-12-2004 01:44 PM

Watching Bush on CNN is painful.
 
He is bumbling through answering questions.

MegaPussy 01-12-2004 01:46 PM

His tactic is pretty ingenious though, he just doesn't answer them.

I thought it was fairly inappropriate to ask about O'Neil at the press conference, and even more futile since any idiot could have told you he wouldn't address it.

- Titus

Dirty F 01-12-2004 01:47 PM

Hes so doing his best to look like a powerful president while all i can think when i see him is monkey.

ytcracker 01-12-2004 01:47 PM

shaquille oneal

<IMX> 01-12-2004 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ytcracker
shaquille oneal
CAT

directfiesta 01-12-2004 01:59 PM

He always mumble and repeat the same thing over and over again... even if it has nothing to do with the question:

- The tyrant is gone
- no more rape rooms ( btw, anybody has a pic, I need for a project..)
- The world is a safer place ( funny, it doesn't seem so: Orange,yellow,red,green)
- The world is more peacefull without Saddam...( Peacefull??? funny, I tought their was a war going on ..)

I just hope our "non-elected" prime- minister don't fuck us up to please an "un-elected" president...

:2 cents:

Sp1nal 01-12-2004 02:14 PM

USA residents keep silence?

Nikoleta 01-12-2004 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by <IMX>
He is bumbling through answering questions.
just change the channel :winkwink:

directfiesta 01-12-2004 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Nikoleta


just change the channel :winkwink:

Change the president...

much better :Graucho

Nikoleta 01-12-2004 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by directfiesta


Change the president...

much better :Graucho

yeah, that's much better :thumbsup

uno 01-12-2004 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Nikoleta


just change the channel :winkwink:

Its like watching an accident happen. You can't help but to watch.

Scootermuze 01-12-2004 04:28 PM

I wanted to see him in a heated debate with one of his opponents..

No doubt they'd ask him to explain all of his lies... That would be fun to watch.. :)

rooster 01-12-2004 04:29 PM

thats what you want, but it wont happen. He is cool as a cucumber. While dean will be getting all red faced like a whiny bitch, he will just have that little grin as if to say you fuckin douche bag. He rules.

69pornlinks 01-12-2004 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sp1nal
USA residents keep silence?
Scared, navie, dumb, pick one:glugglug

directfiesta 01-12-2004 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sp1nal
USA residents keep silence?
Some are starting to talk ( but you have to be carefull: Anti-Bush = USA hater = traitor)...

Quote:

Study Published by Army Criticizes War on Terror's Scope

By Thomas E. Ricks
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, January 12, 2004; Page A12


A scathing new report published by the Army War College broadly criticizes the Bush administration's handling of the war on terrorism, accusing it of taking a detour into an "unnecessary" war in Iraq and pursuing an "unrealistic" quest against terrorism that may lead to U.S. wars with states that pose no serious threat.

...
"[T]he global war on terrorism as currently defined and waged is dangerously indiscriminate and ambitious, and accordingly . . . its parameters should be readjusted," Record writes. Currently, he adds, the anti-terrorism campaign "is strategically unfocused, promises more than it can deliver, and threatens to dissipate U.S. military resources in an endless and hopeless search for absolute security."

Record, a veteran defense specialist and author of six books on military strategy and related issues, was an aide to then-Sen. Sam Nunn when the Georgia Democrat was chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...2004Jan11.html
What is noticeable is the silence of those that honestly beleived their president as saying the truth... They realize but cannot admit they have been fooled....

bjs24 01-12-2004 05:00 PM

I happen to think Bush is a fucking idiot but listening to foreigners bitch about America on gfy is an every day thing so why do you expect rebuttals every time theres a thread saying just about the same thing that was talked about two days ago?

That being said I hope he loses his reelection bid.

theking 01-12-2004 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by directfiesta


What is noticeable is the silence of those that honestly beleived their president as saying the truth... They realize but cannot admit they have been fooled....

Hmm...and what "truth" are you referring to?

directfiesta 01-12-2004 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking


Hmm...and what "truth" are you referring to?

pleaaaaase.... I am not interesting in " playing" with you.

Get a clue.

yys 01-12-2004 05:17 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MegaPussy
His tactic is pretty ingenious though, he just doesn't answer them.



It definitely works. He knows the white house reporters are to chicken shit to press him on it for fear they won't have their ?'s taken anymore.

missnat 01-12-2004 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by directfiesta


Change the president...

much better :Graucho

:thumbsup

Rich 01-12-2004 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sp1nal
USA residents keep silence?
TV tells them to support him.

aleck 01-12-2004 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sp1nal
USA residents keep silence?
they are proud

theking 01-13-2004 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by directfiesta

Some are starting to talk ( but you have to be carefull: Anti-Bush = USA hater = traitor)...


quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Study Published by Army Criticizes War on Terror's Scope

By Thomas E. Ricks
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, January 12, 2004; Page A12


A scathing new report published by the Army War College broadly criticizes the Bush administration's handling of the war on terrorism, accusing it of taking a detour into an "unnecessary" war in Iraq and pursuing an "unrealistic" quest against terrorism that may lead to U.S. wars with states that pose no serious threat.

...
"[T]he global war on terrorism as currently defined and waged is dangerously indiscriminate and ambitious, and accordingly . . . its parameters should be readjusted," Record writes. Currently, he adds, the anti-terrorism campaign "is strategically unfocused, promises more than it can deliver, and threatens to dissipate U.S. military resources in an endless and hopeless search for absolute security."

Record, a veteran defense specialist and author of six books on military strategy and related issues, was an aide to then-Sen. Sam Nunn when the Georgia Democrat was chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dy...-2004Jan11.html

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Misleading information. This is not the official position of the War College but was an article written by Record who was visiting the War College.

sacX 01-13-2004 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking


Misleading information. This is not the official position of the War College but was an article written by Record who was visiting the War College.

It's not misleading at all.

PlayGirl 01-13-2004 04:32 PM

Bush is a genius and a great leader who has done everything possible to better our country. Now all he needs to do is go jump off a bridge.

theking 01-13-2004 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sacX


It's not misleading at all.

I disagree by 180...as the Washington Post article was designed to give the impression that the Military's own War College is in agreement with the article that was written by Record...and it is not. The article written by Record is one man's opinion just as is your opinion. The article by the Washington Post...is very misleading in my opinion.

sacX 01-13-2004 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by theking


I disagree by 180...as the Washington Post article was designed to give the impression that the Military's own War College is in agreement with the article that was written by Record...and it is not. The article written by Record is one man's opinion just as is your opinion. The article by the Washington Post...is very misleading in my opinion.

well it clearly says who it was written by, who he was.. It mentions standard disclaimers. The fact is, it *was* published by the War College. He's a professor (albeit visiting) at the war college. What's misleading about that?

axelcat 01-13-2004 04:58 PM

I really am not a fan of his anymore

theking 01-13-2004 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sacX


well it clearly says who it was written by, who he was.. It mentions standard disclaimers. The fact is, it *was* published by the War College. He's a professor (albeit visiting) at the war college. What's misleading about that?

It isn't...I somehow managed to miss this paragraph...

Quote:

His essay, published by the Army War College's Strategic Studies Institute, carries the standard disclaimer that its views are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the Army, the Pentagon or the U.S. government.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123