![]() |
The shitty part about Saddams capture is...
That it will take millions and months, maybe years to put him to justice.
This guy will end up with either: Imprisonment for life or he will be sentenced to death. We all know that and we all know why. But our system will allow him to defend him self, he will get lawyers, there will be endless amounts of money and time spend on him. Sad, very sad. |
They should just shoot him, the way he shot inocent people...:thumbsup...saves much money by doing this....
|
This is very true, but he is almost out of money, only a few million he had with him!
jDoG |
Quote:
Let him suffer...dont put him out of his misery. |
No, What Really Fucking Sucks is that the USA is at a very High Risk for terrorist attack according to Fox Report.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
yeh, since right around sometime in the 50s/60s? |
he'll be out for good behaviour in 6 month
|
Quote:
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh |
He needs to be paraded through the streets in a bulletproof glass box and let people throw old shoes at him. PUtting your shoe on someone is the ultimate insult there.
|
Quote:
|
I hope he doesn't end up like Pinoche. Scott Fre:BangBang:
|
Battuss:
Quote:
He is going to be "used" by the US for many puposes, - ranging from "we are making people free" to base political propaganda. That has already started. When you consider it was the US who placed him in power when they already knew he was a violent thug, - there is nothing "good" in this "achievement". As far as a trial, he may have a trial, but that again, has been put in place by the US. The US is not willing to have anything other than "showcase trials" in Iraq and is already subject to citicism worldwide. Judges have been appointed with nada experience of human rights/genicide issues under the US occupation of that country. Saddam in a way is meaningless, since he was the "friend" of the US who implented their wishes as was needed over time. He does need a trial, - even if that is a matter of respect to those he has killed. Tho there are serious doubts about any "trials" of Saddam or others by the US, when it was the US who "enabled" him for their own selfish reasons. |
Quote:
|
Head:
Quote:
|
The sad thing for the Bush* administration is that they will no longer be able to blame the attacks on "Saddam loyalists".
Not that anyone with a brain ever believed it, but hey, this is America. |
dam when are they putting my oil well over that Iraqi school? dam those people are lazy.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I wonder if he'll ask for OJ's legal team.... :1orglaugh
|
MrPheer:
Quote:
Sure, he is not bound by any US laws, tho he is currently in a country which is undoubtedly under US occupation. Read that to mean - "anything can happen" :-) The US govt has opposed any form of international criminal courts and has bribed serveral nations in an attempt to do the same. The UN does not currently have any jurisdiction in Iraq until member states decide otherwise. The UN does not have "military tribunals" - they have full publicly open court proceedings. It would be more than embarassing to hear from Council representing Saddam of his history of involvement in crimes against humanity that were enabled and implented on behalf of the United States. Saddam will not, least at this time, have any form of "normal trial" :winkwink: |
BlueDesignStudios:
Quote:
They will have loads of defence evidence that, somehow, - I think some may find disturbing when they see how close it is to their own backyard. |
Quote:
|
he's going to be tried before a Iraqi militari court,
BUT it will take a year they said before Iraq will have a constitution, at the moment there is no law to prosecute him with. |
TheMaster:
Quote:
On the subject of any constitution, we got Bremner's friends writing one and taking as long as possible. We got the Iraqi Census Board with firm plans to have an electoral roll next year. We got Bremner trying to hide this from the "Iraqi Governing Council" cos he don't want no elections :-) But at the same time he is using the lack of an electoral role as the reason "we can't have an election". Anyway, the "Iraqi Governing Council" are outta favor in Washington now cos they ain't doing as they are told. There ain't such a thing, and not likely to see such a thing as an "Iraqi military court" until the US has gone home or has left on the same basis they left during Vietnam. You think for one moment that the "elected" leader in the US is going to pass over Saddam to any democratically elected government in Iraq that probably is not going to look favorably on the US?? History of "US foreign policy" in that region seems to indicate otherwise... |
No it won't.
|
Yeah, give me 3 bucks and I will spend it on a bullet.:ak47:
|
fire him in front of all the iraqis!!!:BangBang:
|
he better be sentenced to death or some serious riots are gonna occur.
|
PHP
$rand = rand(1,1000000000000000); if($rand = ="666"){ echo "sent him to jail with bread and water"; } else { echo "AK 47 Time :D"; } |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:08 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123