GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   http://www.bushin30seconds.org/ (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=193010)

Fletch XXX 11-02-2003 05:38 PM
http://www.bushin30seconds.org/
 
A real contest.

Show your support and donate to this.

At least we can poke fun at him during his State Of The Union Address.

Every cent will count.

http://www.moveonvoterfund.org/

http://www.bushin30seconds.org/

Sifu 11-02-2003 05:39 PM
:321GFY

Fletch XXX 11-02-2003 05:41 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by Sifu
:321GFY
typical

<IMX> 11-02-2003 05:41 PM
interesting shit. thx fletchxxx

GrimShawn 11-02-2003 05:41 PM
interesting stuff there fletch, time to read

Fletch XXX 11-02-2003 05:43 PM
Not everyone can do a contest video, but if you have the know-how why not?

Otherwise, donate a couple bucks to the cause man.

They will run this ad during his state of the union address and will cost a fuckload to do, but its at least a way to make him look bad during his limelight. Or at least the week of anyhow...

http://www.moveonvoterfund.org/

Persecuted 12-02-2003 12:02 PM
Aha!!

BrentD 12-02-2003 12:17 PM
My favorite part:


http://www.bushin30seconds.org/aboutbush.html


Fry the monkey boy bastard and his father too, god damn republicans are the anti-christ!!!

^R3K^ 12-02-2003 12:20 PM
Al Franken is on the judgeing panal. lol

I'm reading his Liar book right now, about halfway through it. great book

Loryn 12-02-2003 12:24 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by ^R3K^
Al Franken is on the judgeing panal. lol

I'm reading his Liar book right now, about halfway through it. great book
After you are done with his book you should read one of Ann Coulter's. Not saying this in a fighting way. I just think when you read both sides of the coin and make a decision for yourself you become well educated and not brain washed. :)

sperbonzo 12-02-2003 12:29 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by Loryn-Adult.com


After you are done with his book you should read one of Ann Coulter's. Not saying this in a fighting way. I just think when you read both sides of the coin and make a decision for yourself you become well educated and not brain washed. :)

What a frighteningly sensible thing to suggest! ( I'm sure that it will never go over on this board though) :thumbsup

candyflip 12-02-2003 12:30 PM
Great link Fletch!

With the talent of the folks on GFY, we could probably put a nice ad together for the contest.

sperbonzo 12-02-2003 12:33 PM
This is the same kind of stuff that the left likes to always pull...e.g. that memo that the democrats put out to use military secrets to hurt Bush:



Tuesday, Nov. 4, 2003 4:38 p.m. EST
Dem Intel Committee Memo Reveals Anti-Bush Plot

A memo circulated among Democrats on the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence shows the committee's minority plotting to use classified information against the White House in next year's presidential campaign.

The document, obtained and disclosed by nationally syndicated radio host Sean Hannity Tuesday afternoon, suggests that the top priority among senior Democrats entrusted with guarding the nation's security is instead driving the Bush administration from power based on claims it exaggerated intelligence on the threat posed by Iraq.

The memo as reported by Hannity reads as follows:

"We have carefully reviewed our options under the rules and believe we have identified the best approach. Our plan is as follows:

"1) Pull the majority along as far as we can on issues that may lead to major new disclosures regarding improper or questionable conduct by administration officials. We are having some success in that regard.

"For example, in addition to the President's State of the Union speech, the chairman [Sen. Pat Roberts] has agreed to look at the activities of the office of the Secretary of Defense, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, as well as Secretary Bolton's office at the State Department.

"The fact that the chairman supports our investigations into these offices and cosigns our requests for information is helpful and potentially crucial. We don't know what we will find but our prospects for getting the access we seek is far greater when we have the backing of the majority. [We can verbally mention some of the intriguing leads we are pursuing.]

"2) Assiduously prepare Democratic 'additional views' to attach to any interim or final reports the committee may release. Committee rules provide this opportunity and we intend to take full advantage of it.

"In that regard we may have already compiled all the public statements on Iraq made by senior administration officials. We will identify the most exaggerated claims. We will contrast them with the intelligence estimates that have since been declassified. Our additional views will also, among other things, castigate the majority for seeking to limit the scope of the inquiry.

"The Democrats will then be in a strong position to reopen the question of establishing an Independent Commission [i.e., the Corzine Amendment.]

"3) Prepare to launch an independent investigation when it becomes clear we have exhausted the opportunity to usefully collaborate with the majority. We can pull the trigger on an independent investigation of the administration's use of intelligence at any time. But we can only do so once.

"The best time to do so will probably be next year, either:

"A) After we have already released our additional views on an interim report, thereby providing as many as three opportunities to make our case to the public. Additional views on the interim report (1). The announcement of our independent investigation (2). And (3) additional views on the final investigation. Or:

"B) Once we identify solid leads the majority does not want to pursue, we would attract more coverage and have greater credibility in that context than one in which we simply launch an independent investigation based on principled but vague notions regarding the use of intelligence.

"In the meantime, even without a specifically authorized independent investigation, we continue to act independently when we encounter footdragging on the part of the majority. For example, the FBI Niger investigation was done solely at the request of the vice chairman. We have independently submitted written requests to the DOD and we are preparing further independent requests for information.

"SUMMARY: Intelligence issues are clearly secondary to the public's concern regarding the insurgency in Iraq. Yet we have an important role to play in revealing the misleading, if not flagrantly dishonest, methods and motives of senior administration officials who made the case for unilateral preemptive war.

"The approach outlined above seems to offer the best prospect for exposing the administration's dubious motives." [End of Memo Excerpt.]

The revelation that Democrats are using the intelligence committee to conduct opposition research for the coming presidential campaign demands an investigation by the Senate Ethics Committee, Hannity said.

Loryn 12-02-2003 12:55 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by sperbonzo
This is the same kind of stuff that the left likes to always pull...e.g. that memo that the democrats put out to use military secrets to hurt Bush:



Tuesday, Nov. 4, 2003 4:38 p.m. EST
Dem Intel Committee Memo Reveals Anti-Bush Plot

A memo circulated among Democrats on the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence shows the committee's minority plotting to use classified information against the White House in next year's presidential campaign.

The document, obtained and disclosed by nationally syndicated radio host Sean Hannity Tuesday afternoon, suggests that the top priority among senior Democrats entrusted with guarding the nation's security is instead driving the Bush administration from power based on claims it exaggerated intelligence on the threat posed by Iraq.

The memo as reported by Hannity reads as follows:

"We have carefully reviewed our options under the rules and believe we have identified the best approach. Our plan is as follows:

"1) Pull the majority along as far as we can on issues that may lead to major new disclosures regarding improper or questionable conduct by administration officials. We are having some success in that regard.

"For example, in addition to the President's State of the Union speech, the chairman [Sen. Pat Roberts] has agreed to look at the activities of the office of the Secretary of Defense, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, as well as Secretary Bolton's office at the State Department.

"The fact that the chairman supports our investigations into these offices and cosigns our requests for information is helpful and potentially crucial. We don't know what we will find but our prospects for getting the access we seek is far greater when we have the backing of the majority. [We can verbally mention some of the intriguing leads we are pursuing.]

"2) Assiduously prepare Democratic 'additional views' to attach to any interim or final reports the committee may release. Committee rules provide this opportunity and we intend to take full advantage of it.

"In that regard we may have already compiled all the public statements on Iraq made by senior administration officials. We will identify the most exaggerated claims. We will contrast them with the intelligence estimates that have since been declassified. Our additional views will also, among other things, castigate the majority for seeking to limit the scope of the inquiry.

"The Democrats will then be in a strong position to reopen the question of establishing an Independent Commission [i.e., the Corzine Amendment.]

"3) Prepare to launch an independent investigation when it becomes clear we have exhausted the opportunity to usefully collaborate with the majority. We can pull the trigger on an independent investigation of the administration's use of intelligence at any time. But we can only do so once.

"The best time to do so will probably be next year, either:

"A) After we have already released our additional views on an interim report, thereby providing as many as three opportunities to make our case to the public. Additional views on the interim report (1). The announcement of our independent investigation (2). And (3) additional views on the final investigation. Or:

"B) Once we identify solid leads the majority does not want to pursue, we would attract more coverage and have greater credibility in that context than one in which we simply launch an independent investigation based on principled but vague notions regarding the use of intelligence.

"In the meantime, even without a specifically authorized independent investigation, we continue to act independently when we encounter footdragging on the part of the majority. For example, the FBI Niger investigation was done solely at the request of the vice chairman. We have independently submitted written requests to the DOD and we are preparing further independent requests for information.

"SUMMARY: Intelligence issues are clearly secondary to the public's concern regarding the insurgency in Iraq. Yet we have an important role to play in revealing the misleading, if not flagrantly dishonest, methods and motives of senior administration officials who made the case for unilateral preemptive war.

"The approach outlined above seems to offer the best prospect for exposing the administration's dubious motives." [End of Memo Excerpt.]

The revelation that Democrats are using the intelligence committee to conduct opposition research for the coming presidential campaign demands an investigation by the Senate Ethics Committee, Hannity said.
:thumbsup

^R3K^ 12-02-2003 01:01 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by Loryn-Adult.com


After you are done with his book you should read one of Ann Coulter's. Not saying this in a fighting way. I just think when you read both sides of the coin and make a decision for yourself you become well educated and not brain washed. :)
How weak minded do you think I am to think I am brainwashed when I say I'm halfway through a book and its a great book? :eek7

Actually I have always been a registered republican and have read Ann's books. I can and have took facts that sounded unbelievable in Frankins book and looked it up on LexisNexis, and it was a fact. I don't think Facts is what is used to Brainwash people, I think its lies.

When people cross check facts and look for the truth it makes them "well educated", When people believe lies because its easier or because of repetition then its Brainwashed.

Corleone 12-02-2003 02:05 PM
good campaign :)

please don't vote for bush next time.

-=HOAX=- 12-02-2003 02:15 PM
"panel of esteemed judges, including Michael Moore, Donna Brazile, Jack Black, Janeane Garofalo, Margaret Cho and Gus Van Sant."

Someone shoot me.

Rich 12-02-2003 02:24 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by sperbonzo
This is the same kind of stuff that the left likes to always pull...e.g. that memo that the democrats put out to use military secrets to hurt Bush:



Tuesday, Nov. 4, 2003 4:38 p.m. EST
Dem Intel Committee Memo Reveals Anti-Bush Plot

A memo circulated among Democrats on the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence shows the committee's minority plotting to use classified information against the White House in next year's presidential campaign.

The document, obtained and disclosed by nationally syndicated radio host Sean Hannity Tuesday afternoon, suggests that the top priority among senior Democrats entrusted with guarding the nation's security is instead driving the Bush administration from power based on claims it exaggerated intelligence on the threat posed by Iraq.

The memo as reported by Hannity reads as follows:

"We have carefully reviewed our options under the rules and believe we have identified the best approach. Our plan is as follows:

"1) Pull the majority along as far as we can on issues that may lead to major new disclosures regarding improper or questionable conduct by administration officials. We are having some success in that regard.

"For example, in addition to the President's State of the Union speech, the chairman [Sen. Pat Roberts] has agreed to look at the activities of the office of the Secretary of Defense, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, as well as Secretary Bolton's office at the State Department.

"The fact that the chairman supports our investigations into these offices and cosigns our requests for information is helpful and potentially crucial. We don't know what we will find but our prospects for getting the access we seek is far greater when we have the backing of the majority. [We can verbally mention some of the intriguing leads we are pursuing.]

"2) Assiduously prepare Democratic 'additional views' to attach to any interim or final reports the committee may release. Committee rules provide this opportunity and we intend to take full advantage of it.

"In that regard we may have already compiled all the public statements on Iraq made by senior administration officials. We will identify the most exaggerated claims. We will contrast them with the intelligence estimates that have since been declassified. Our additional views will also, among other things, castigate the majority for seeking to limit the scope of the inquiry.

"The Democrats will then be in a strong position to reopen the question of establishing an Independent Commission [i.e., the Corzine Amendment.]

"3) Prepare to launch an independent investigation when it becomes clear we have exhausted the opportunity to usefully collaborate with the majority. We can pull the trigger on an independent investigation of the administration's use of intelligence at any time. But we can only do so once.

"The best time to do so will probably be next year, either:

"A) After we have already released our additional views on an interim report, thereby providing as many as three opportunities to make our case to the public. Additional views on the interim report (1). The announcement of our independent investigation (2). And (3) additional views on the final investigation. Or:

"B) Once we identify solid leads the majority does not want to pursue, we would attract more coverage and have greater credibility in that context than one in which we simply launch an independent investigation based on principled but vague notions regarding the use of intelligence.

"In the meantime, even without a specifically authorized independent investigation, we continue to act independently when we encounter footdragging on the part of the majority. For example, the FBI Niger investigation was done solely at the request of the vice chairman. We have independently submitted written requests to the DOD and we are preparing further independent requests for information.

"SUMMARY: Intelligence issues are clearly secondary to the public's concern regarding the insurgency in Iraq. Yet we have an important role to play in revealing the misleading, if not flagrantly dishonest, methods and motives of senior administration officials who made the case for unilateral preemptive war.

"The approach outlined above seems to offer the best prospect for exposing the administration's dubious motives." [End of Memo Excerpt.]

The revelation that Democrats are using the intelligence committee to conduct opposition research for the coming presidential campaign demands an investigation by the Senate Ethics Committee, Hannity said.

This demands an investigation by the Senate Ethics Committee? Funny how somehow using classified information that's classified BECAUSE IT SHOWS THE ADMINISTRATION IS LYING is worthy of an investigation, yet the White House leaking the name of a CIA agent to shut up her and other potential whistle blowers is not. What a fucking joke. :1orglaugh

Mr.Fiction 12-02-2003 02:39 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by Rich



This demands an investigation by the Senate Ethics Committee? Funny how somehow using classified information that's classified BECAUSE IT SHOWS THE ADMINISTRATION IS LYING is worthy of an investigation, yet the White House leaking the name of a CIA agent to shut up her and other potential whistle blowers is not. What a fucking joke. :1orglaugh
The most ironic part is that the memo, along with several others, some of which were classified, were illegally stolen by Republicans!

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/...in585755.shtml


Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch said Tuesday he had put one of his staffers on administrative leave for improperly obtaining data from the secure computer networks of two Democratic senators.

Hatch, R-Utah, said preliminary interviews suggested that a former Republican member of the committee staff may have also been involved in penetrating the Democratic computers.

Several leak investigations are under way in Washington. The FBI is investigating whether White House or Pentagon staff members illegally leaked the name of a CIA operative to reporters writing about the operative's husband, former ambassador and Iraq war critic Joseph Wilson.

The Justice Department is also looking into the leak of a classified memo from the Pentagon to the Senate Intelligence Committee. The memo, a reply to the committee's queries about the accuracy of prewar intelligence on Iraq, reports alleged evidence of a link between the Saddam Hussein regime and the al Qaeda terrorist network.

:1orglaugh

Rich 12-02-2003 02:55 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by Mr.Fiction


The most ironic part is that the memo, along with several others, some of which were classified, were illegally stolen by Republicans!

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/...in585755.shtml


Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch said Tuesday he had put one of his staffers on administrative leave for improperly obtaining data from the secure computer networks of two Democratic senators.

Hatch, R-Utah, said preliminary interviews suggested that a former Republican member of the committee staff may have also been involved in penetrating the Democratic computers.

Several leak investigations are under way in Washington. The FBI is investigating whether White House or Pentagon staff members illegally leaked the name of a CIA operative to reporters writing about the operative's husband, former ambassador and Iraq war critic Joseph Wilson.

The Justice Department is also looking into the leak of a classified memo from the Pentagon to the Senate Intelligence Committee. The memo, a reply to the committee's queries about the accuracy of prewar intelligence on Iraq, reports alleged evidence of a link between the Saddam Hussein regime and the al Qaeda terrorist network.

:1orglaugh
Unreal, and then straight to the hands of Sean Hannity to misinform the stupid masses. God Bless George Bush's America.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:35 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123