GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Is this Acacia Part II? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=189300)

Eyes_Without_A_Face 10-23-2003 03:36 PM

Is this Acacia Part II?
 
Check this out:

http://www.youmaybenext.com/ :helpme

triumph 10-23-2003 03:37 PM

FUCK THEM TOO!

JSA Matt 10-23-2003 03:40 PM

Quote:

They claim that if you use graphical and textual information on a video screen for purposes of making a sale, then you are infringing on their patent.
What does "on a video screen" mean exactly?

Fabuleux 10-23-2003 03:43 PM

Television commercials are allmost older than patents...

GeXus 10-23-2003 03:43 PM

lol look at there website
http://www.panip.com/

You think they can afford to sue people? haha i dont think so

LuSiD 10-23-2003 04:06 PM

If you guys look a little deeper into the site that was posted in the first message in this thread, you'll realize that this is old news. PanIP was the first Acacia, and Acacia is simply copying off of what they did to make as much money as possible until people stop acting like puppets and fight back.

If you read the UPDATE in the link from the main page (which I've posted below), you will find the following:

First, through the support of the public and the help of a private prior art search firm, we have found substantial evidence undermining PanIP's patents. In May we used this evidence to file requests with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office ("PTO") to reexamine and invalidate both of them. At the same time we moved to stay PanIP's lawsuits, and in June the federal court in San Diego issued an order staying the cases to allow our reexamination requests to be considered. In July, we received notice that the PTO has accepted our request for reexamination and agrees that we have raised "a substantial new question of patentability" as to the claims of the first of PanIP's patents. Thus, this patent will now be reexamined in its entirety and we are confident that it will be invalidated. We anticipate a similar finding with respect to the second PanIP patent shortly.

Second, we have obtained an award of attorney's fees against PanIP for approximately $19,000.00 related to the defense of PanIP's unsupported lawsuit alleging defamation and trademark infringement against the PanIP Group Defense Fund, as well as naming my wife and me personally along with our business.

Third, we have successfully stopped PanIP's strategy of suing small and medium sized businesses from around the country in San Diego in order to coerce a licensing fee from those defendants. They have not sued one other business since we started our fight.


Link to the Update Message

Maybe this should be yet ANOTHER wake up call that patents with broad definitions are bullshit. As the world moves forward, ideas from the past don't stand up to the tests of time. Just as a patent on teleportation technology will not make a difference 50 years from now, these patents should not mean dick today. And they don't... unless everyone cowards in a corner and gives in.

There's my :2 cents:.



"We may be through with the past, but the past ain't through with us." --Magnolia

GFED 10-23-2003 04:36 PM

:BangBang:

FightThisPatent 10-23-2003 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by LuSiD



Maybe this should be yet ANOTHER wake up call that patents with broad definitions are bullshit.



Yes, that's what I am saying, and why the need for Fight The Patent Foundation.

:2 cents:


Fight The Patent!


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123