GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   some fuck stain copies ftvgirls.com design. (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=181423)

lagwagon 10-01-2003 01:28 PM

some fuck stain copies ftvgirls.com design.
 
look at this shit. i mean it is shit, but the tables, images, and the fucking updates link is for sure a copy. lol what a lame ass.

http://hotdevilgirls.com/

Trax 10-01-2003 01:31 PM

nahhh
dont really agree

that site doesnt lookas if its copied
it sucks so heavy
you should feel sorry for that guy!

lagwagon 10-01-2003 01:32 PM

i do.

okny 10-01-2003 01:34 PM

I dont know if you can call that a design :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Shit looks like some open photoshop for the first time

snipah7 10-01-2003 01:36 PM

Yeah, right down to the enourmous images.

not a copy.

freeadultcontent 10-01-2003 01:38 PM

Im on the fence here. First their site is slow as shit, graphics suck and generally looks kinda mid 90's ish.
Problem is that yes FTV uses the magazine style look, so does this site. Kinda fucked up, but at same time I had seriously thought about using a magazine style cover myself well before I even seen a FTV site, or any of the various mags (mostly email sponsors) that are currently out there.

So I am not sure if FTV's format is even original, since afterall they are copying a magazine format which in itself is using a pre-existing idea. Knowing that I thought of the same thing myself before I knew others were doing it, just leads me to believe that there are very few if any unique ideas.

FTV is about quality content, fucking great pictures, ect. I think it has nothing to do with their design. What the fuck do I know anyhow. I mean first horizontal tours, then verticle long tours, fpa's, shit you name it, someone did it first and the rest of us copied. It is a standard magazine look, is all I can say.

lagwagon 10-01-2003 01:39 PM

ya not a copy but rather the layout is very similar and if you look at our update pages they are exact. but jeez that is a horrible design he has going. needs to hire someone at least.

lagwagon 10-01-2003 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by freeadultcontent
Im on the fence here. First their site is slow as shit, graphics suck and generally looks kinda mid 90's ish.
Problem is that yes FTV uses the magazine style look, so does this site. Kinda fucked up, but at same time I had seriously thought about using a magazine style cover myself well before I even seen a FTV site, or any of the various mags (mostly email sponsors) that are currently out there.

So I am not sure if FTV's format is even original, since afterall they are copying a magazine format which in itself is using a pre-existing idea. Knowing that I thought of the same thing myself before I knew others were doing it, just leads me to believe that there are very few if any unique ideas.

FTV is about quality content, fucking great pictures, ect. I think it has nothing to do with their design. What the fuck do I know anyhow. I mean first horizontal tours, then verticle long tours, fpa's, shit you name it, someone did it first and the rest of us copied. It is a standard magazine look, is all I can say.


ya lets cross out the fact that i said images. we did not invent that magazine look by any means. :1orglaugh

Thrawn$ 10-01-2003 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by lagwagon
but jeez that is a horrible design he has going.
he is copying your design right? :)

lagwagon 10-01-2003 01:44 PM

haha catch 22, we are kicking ass with our current design. at least could have tried to flatter us a little bit more. i think it just rubbed me wrong. it is 1:45pm and i have been up all night.

freeadultcontent 10-01-2003 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by lagwagon



ya lets cross out the fact that i said images. we did not invent that magazine look by any means. :1orglaugh

Possible missunderstanding. I did not really go over the site a bunch, just checked out the updates area and saw the magazine look.

Hell I did not even know that you started the thread :winkwink: The quality compared to FTV was laughable at best so I did not look at many of the little details. So wasnt trying to miss the fact you said images, though I am still a little unclear on what you mean, if it is not the magazine look to them.

Tipsy 10-01-2003 01:50 PM

Wow - what a nasty site. I wonder if the guy gets anyone stay around long enough for all the images to actually load.

lagwagon 10-01-2003 01:50 PM

ya i need to sleep. :glugglug

swingerman 10-01-2003 01:50 PM

OMG! what a shitty site! :throwup

DarkJedi 10-01-2003 02:05 PM

LOL, the stole your font man :glugglug

Pad 10-01-2003 02:07 PM

That is just horrific :helpme

foolio 10-01-2003 02:09 PM

dammmmmmmm that is a slow ass site

Johny Traffic 10-01-2003 02:12 PM

If this site is a copy the the original cant be much good? It looks like 1000's of other not very good sites

kmanrox 10-02-2003 12:30 AM

they dont look anything alike to me...both equally as poorly designed.... a 56k person would be fucked trying to load either of them

HotDevilGirls 10-02-2003 12:57 AM

Hello all I was informed about these threads as it is called.
1. To the the guy Lagwagon is it, I know the Owner of the site for starters.
2. Yes it looks similar in the updates page,( Because Rob n I discussed how to make pages or a site, and he said he or his webguys first learned by copying n pasting then changing sites to fit his needs).
3. I am a photographer and by no means a site builder.
4. I am working on ideas and how to work dreamweaver, so what the fuck!!!
5. The magazine thing is on soooooo many sites its pittaful!!!
6. hers a few Met-Art.com , RonHarris.com etc... etc..
7. Have a Nice Day:ak47:

lagwagon 10-02-2003 03:22 AM

word, yes we are partners in FTV. :thumbsup and yes it is confirmed a copy. thanks for the info hot devils. good day to you sir.

lagwagon 10-02-2003 03:32 AM

also sorry if i hurt your feelings. i was in a bad mood as of yesterday.

chodadog 10-02-2003 03:37 AM

That is not a copy.

Jimmy Lifestyles 10-02-2003 03:40 AM

HotDevilGirls- That site is bad-ass! Tizzzz-iet! I love the way the glow around satans eyes (that is the devil himself right?) looks all pixely an shit. Sick Effects!
My question is Did Foxy Lady's, oh i mean "Duran" on your site, did her braces just become insanely hot shooting in the depths of hell?
Also
Did the girls tuck their tails? Or are they not devil girls, but in fact girls of the devil? Because I know some peeps that have Satanist traffic that may help.

HotDevilGirls 10-02-2003 04:00 AM

Lagwagon only the updates is a copy, and you didnt hurt my feelings, you are nobody and especially nobody to me so it is no biggy,
Jimmy they are girls of the devil.
Peace:thumbsup

TurboTrucker 10-02-2003 04:12 AM

OMG other than looking 100% different, it's a carbon copy.

chodadog 10-02-2003 04:41 AM

Oh no, he lists his updates in order of the date they were added! Goddamn! What a thief! The only think he's "stolen" was the word "PhotoGirl." The rest of the site isn't alike at all. A post like this is only going to make FTV look like a pack of whiney bitches. Bad move, i reckon.

bigdog 10-02-2003 05:01 AM

well wasn't freezinebucks the first one to have the magazine style layout?

TheViper 10-02-2003 05:09 AM

that is a fucking remake for sure, what an imbecil


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:00 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123