911 Mystery: Strange Object On Plane?
 

http://www.rense.com/general41/whatisit.htm


I've been wondering to post this or not, but it's part of an ongoing debate based on the new footage of the WTC tragedy. A new video showed something the other vids didn't a supposed strange object on the bottom of one of the planes.

I say it's a light phenomenon or as one expert put it one of the landing gears opening due to stress but you guys decide.

There's a lotta video and pics on the rense.com site in a big column focusing on it.

whatta you aircraft experts think?

dude...you are starting to sound like MassiveCock

Shadow from the RHS engine reflecting on the bottom of the fuselage.



NEXT!

who knows?

so blurry

<img src="http://www.hardpixxx.com/board/timeline.gif">

Landing wheels.

That's one of the first things I thought but look at the moving, not still video footage also posted at the main site.

The best explanation has gotta be the stress causing the landing gear panel to open and the sunlight casting shadows.

Interesting Greg, like a bulge or something on the bottom, hmmm

no clue... who knows man.. all that shit happened so fuckin fast

Looks like a shadow to me...

As a painter and an oldschool raytracing expert, I know firsthand that light and shadow are totally unpredictable... If you really start looking for bizarre shadows you will see them everywhere :p

Some photographers make a living doing this :1orglaugh

now things are getting muddy....
don't know which theory to believe in.

Here is a more logical explaination....

Its fake. Pictures are blurry, except one clear picture and the video is "flash" which we all know is very easy to "mess with" If they can make a video that makes it look like Britney Spears is giving an interview then just ups and starts playing with her bare pussy, then I am pretty sure making a video with a "shadow" would not be a problem at all.


Flow

Agreed BUT the real footage is owned by the news networks. If it was fake then everybody wouldn't have the same images. The faker would have had to use the original footage before it got to the news services.

Sure, but the original footage is one thing, the stills another.

This calls for aircraft experts and graphics experts to decipher.

I don't get it...what difference does it make?

i dont see shit

maybe it with the r/c antenna that g dumbya was using to steer the remote control plane into the wtc?:2 cents:

We're all aviation experts here at GFY