![]() |
Macromedia Dreamweaver MX 2004 is out!
I am actually excited. Writing PHP and XML/XLT code has just gotten even easier.
Dreamweaver MX 2004 |
great,where's the crack please?
|
sounds good
|
You need the fixed crack from Paradox. The first crack doesn't work, produces stupid JS errors.
|
A bunch of theving motherfuckers.
|
i second that
|
whats different than mx, i dont want to get it if its just minimal changes
|
I'm amazed by the number of people that use Dreamweaver. Being in this business, HTML should be a REQUIRED KNOWLEDGE. You people get more and more lazy I swear.
|
someone hook me up with the warez
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I use DW mostly to write code by hand, it has a quality code editor. I do use various CSS wizards whenever possible, why type the exact shit that DW can type for you?
|
Quote:
REQUIRED KNOWLEDGE? What are you the HTML Police? |
Since when does using an editor mean you don't know markup?
But, I'll admit, Dreamweaver has made me a little lazy. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Can't wait to get my hands on the new version & yes I do know markup as well just haven't needed it much lately, but it always does come in handy. |
Quote:
|
hahahaha
|
Sorry guys, i'm a programmer and I really can't stand the CRAP that dreamweaver spits out. Someone here uses it :(
|
whats new in it? Anythign worthwhile?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
:winkwink: |
Quote:
Try again. |
Yeah, i program too. Dreamweaver spits out nicely formatted w3c compliant html/xhtml/xml. Hand coding is great if it's what you like, but dont bag on people who like wysiwyg tools.
After all...If I am using VC++ i dont open up the resource files and define buttons just cause i *can*.. I use the graphical tools provided to me because it makes my life easier and spits out code that is equally functional but in less time. I find it phenomenally difficult to believe that you could do nested tables with varying borders, cell paddings and widths, some with multiple colspans at the same speed that I could do the same thing graphically in dw. And pay for it you pathetic fucks. Jeez. |
Quote:
jDoG |
I have been using the 30 day trial since MX 2004 was released.
It's very bloated IMHO....Slower than Regular Dreamweaver MX...not that many added features that I would use often AND it crashed the last time I had it open. I stopped using it tonight. Regular Dreamweaver MX is lightening fast compared to MX 2004. I'm not upgrading. Oh, STFU about the hand coding shit. This isn't the 90's ya know. |
handcoding from scratch is indeed a waste of time. i use DW to make the rough draft, and revise the html and incorperate css... writing it from scratch takes quite a bit longer.
|
Quote:
|
does anybody know if you have to uninstall mx 6.0 to install mx 2004 or it overwrites it? Seems I've ended up with 2 copies!
|
Nothing wrong with knowing html code inside and out. I have used Homesite for years now...and still use it for 90% of what I do. I use Dreamweaver for the other 10%. Nothing beats knowing the basics of html..... should be standard for webmasters. :2 cents:
|
If you hate WYSIWYG html editors cause of all the extra crap they add to the page (me too), but you'd like the convenience of clicking on a button to add HTML code, check out this program:
http://www.notetab.com/ I hire professional web designers to do my sites, but when I want to edit the HTML code to make minor changes, I use Note Tab Pro. It makes it easy to "hand code" your web pages without the bloat added by the WYSIWYG programs. |
Quote:
Using Dreamweaver does not mean that you don't know HTML. HTML is not hard to learn. Dreamweaver is for speed. |
Quote:
Anyone else have anything to say about the program? |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:53 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123