Trial vs Non Trial?
 

What do webmasters prefer more of:

Sites with trials or no trials?
And what's working better for you right now?

trial are good if u are pushing a pps hehe

Club 17 offers no trial, but for those who leave them without joining, it pop-ups a trial version ( called "Club Sweethearts" ).
I don't like the trials there - only 20% are recurring.
All paysites shouldn't offer trials :Graucho
It should be obvious for everyone that if one wants to join a porn-paysite, he has to pay $25-40 per month.
No cheap trials and no free trials.
Quality products and good partnership programs for webmasters :winkwink:

Good point!

:thumbsup

Trials suck. :2 cents:

what SGS said!

what he said

People want trials when pushing a per sign up program, cause it's easier to make a sale. I personally won't push a rev share program (50/50) that has a trial, cause i don't send traffic to make $1.50 per sale and see none of them convert. No matter what anyone says, trials convert very poorly - 10%-30%. I even send traffic to one popular teen site and saw none of the 50 trials I sent convert to a full membership. That sucked.

what that other dude said a while ago and stuff

trials are good.. free trials converted about 30 % for me all year and paid trials about 60 - 70% for me (not sure yet just started paid trials)

60-70% on paid trials?? what site was that?

tushy cash

i like those 30 min trials

You'll make less money per signup with trials, but you'll make more money overall with trials.

I promote karupspc.com. Before they had trials so signups and rebills were very low. Then they quit offering trials. I make much more money as an affiliate now. Most of signups recurr for an eternity.