Voyeur beach content for sale
 

Here is the deal...

358 hi quality pics from a beach in spain for 100$

samples

http://www.partygalleries.com/samples/1.jpg

more
http://www.partygalleries.com/samples/2.jpg
http://www.partygalleries.com/samples/3.jpg
http://www.partygalleries.com/samples/4.jpg

icq 76131595

[email protected]

nice pics BH!

Do you have any video clips or is it all stills?

He also has vids i believe.

thanks man

I have 90min of video aswell

Nice Pics :thumbsup

thanks man

anybody else intrested?

flat butts :(

http://www.partygalleries.com/samples/4.jpg

id plz?

Ibiza ???
:glugglug

Sweet. Are those the best 3 out of the 358?
Also do you have 358 model releases? I don't think CCbill is accepting any new candid sites.
Do you have any material from Miami?

got ids? ;)

Do you need ID's its not exactly porn

What would "ids" be needed for? These pics fall well within the category of candid shots. If you're not familiar with the genre, stfu.

Well...you are definitly not familiair with this shit, the way you react. They can sue your ass all the way to the bank for this type of content.

Well said Grumpy. Times have changed. Examples; Pierdog's site, and even eurobeach two great candid beach sites are down.
Girl's gone wild are getting a new lawsuit everyday.
It may be great content, but if you can't sell it without problems, why bother.

This is 2003, we must stick to crack whores swapping spit, THAT"S OK....

DeadFidel , those are just 4 out off the 358...i can easily post more with girls hot as those ,
in this type of thing you don't need ids or model releases
girls gone wild are getting sued for asking girls to tell that they are over 18 when they aren't , and basicly paid minors to do PORN

this is not porn no body been paid

Well, in France that may true, but only if someone complains when you're taking the picture. The rest of the western world seems to think these are merely documentation of beach attire.

Good job, there! You almost sound credible.

Too bad that www.eurobeach.com is there to show otherwise and I happen to know why pierdog closed his site, and it wasn't because he was getting sued by anyone.

As far as GGW, they deserve every bit of the heat they brought onto themselves; there is a line and they crossed it. But what that might have to do with pictures of some gals sunning themselves on the beach... well... I'm sorry I don't see it.

Hey, best of luck of with your "crack whores swapping spit". That sounds like a winner for sure!

And, please, keep my calendar updated regularly now that you've volunteered for the job. Just a reminder of what month it is every once in awhile will do. Thank-you.

Public nudity does not need 2257's.
It does need to be presented in "news" format.
They have no case unless you use their pictures for advertising. Does this mean TGP?s not sure, GGW laws suite had to do with the girl on their box.

Geesh people stop crying.

Even television and newspapers shows shots like this and i dont hear you crying about them.

Check voyeurweb.com, the biggest voyeur site on the net, over a million visitors a day. They show way sneaker stuff, hidden toilet cams and things like that.

Theyve been around for years and will stay for years.

Good job, there! You almost sound (ed) credible.

Too bad that w-w.eurobeach.com
Check out the proc, (PG-Globel)?

Hey, best of luck of with your "crack whores swapping spit". That sounds like a winner for sure!

Sorry, I meant to say pretty crack whores swapping spit.

And, please, keep my calendar updated regularly now that you've volunteered for the job. Just a reminder of what month it is every once in awhile will do. Thank-you.

Sorry to beat up your responce, but I will pay you XYZ of money if you prove CCbill. Ibill, or Veritol will take that kind of material.

I'm ready to bet 200 to 1 if you hava the funds

The difference betweeen ignorance and stupidity is that someone who is ignorant will limit themselves to questions about something they know nothing about.

I gess i be stubid den. I is sory four bing innorent.
I as be smerter nest times sir , plese don be wiping me!!!

CCBILL. 1888 906-xxxx(compliance)

Tell you what. If you can get Corvette to come on and publicly state that the pictures above could be could be part of a website, I'll increase my bet to 400 to 1. ( Then I can take the 5000 pics I have and put them to use and still make a profit)
Otherwise shut the fuck up.

Maybe a newbie here......

Keep your money in your pocket, I'd feel badly taking it from someone as dimwitted as you...

http://puffybeach.com/samples/ulthm1.htm

I am sure the players working the link above will approve of you giving out the URL like you did. Once bitten twice shy.

Let's look at the same in about 7 days.

If this is a contest of wits, you may, (may) win. If this a matter of fact then I'll win.

Well, it certainly couldn't be any "contest of wits". LOL

As a matter of fact, your cluelessness is begining to bore me. I guess you're entitled to your misguided, mistaken opinion, no matter how outlandish it might be. And, since a silly notion like this only affects the person that holds it, I'm going to simply wish you all the best in life and let you stumble on your merry way.

I'll just give this thread one last bump so the the evening crowd is aware of the fantastic deal that BabeHunter is offering.

Thanks man

Fiveyes is right. Well, mostly right about a lot of this stuff anyway. He's got a really good handle on the way things work. It just disappoints me to see how little respect people are giving him here and in other threads.

Granted, I do have my difference of opinion on some of his statements, but in general he's on the money.

Go ask a lawyer.

Note to Fiveyes. Today is a better day. I never said the material he was selling was not good nor a not good deal. I just can't seem to get APIC to vouch for that sort of content. I have hundreds of simular jpegs shot by myself and I can't use them.
Anyway you seem to be a gentlemen, sorry I if I was rude.

You need APIC's approval?

Maybe I am being singled out, but yes. I am told I can't prove it's my shoot(s) if I don't have the persons release.

Babehunter actually ziped me an index of all the pics (thanks) and the look great.

I have no idea what position you're in but if you NEED APIC then you have a serious problem. That's the equivalent of needing cancer to survive.

looks really nice

EXACTLY! Voyeurweb.com is proof this shit is legal... and nice :thumbsup

Look at it this way: Say you took a picture of a tree and say National Geographic ripped it off and used it in their magazine. Is APIC going to ask you for a model release for the tree?

If you take a picture you own it.

Cheers,
BV

Somebody let NakedBeachGirls.com drop today.

Amazing . . .

Furthermore,

The possibility of getting sued in a civil court from using this type of content is always going to be there.

It's a risk that you take. Just like there is a risk in using 100% model release anal gang bang hardcore material.

Personally I'd rather risk getting sued in civil court by some chick you took a picture of flashing her tits than taking the chance of having OBSCENITY charges filed against me in a CRIMINAL court.

So you see, most everyone in this business takes risks, it's just what kind of risks do you want to take: civil monetary or criminal ass raped behind bars.

Point being: there is nothing obscene about nude beach pics so you don't have to worry about obscenity criminal charges.

Cheers,
BV

well said

and ditto to what SassyAss said...keep it in a 'newsworthy' format to keep it 100% kosher...

:thumbsup :thumbsup

Its funny as i just saw a Dutch television program where they filmed on a (Spanish i think) beach.

Alot of girls, most of em topless.

Im pretty sure they didnt ask them their id's and didnt let them sign agreements...actually im 100% sure.

And I apolologize for being so abrasive. Nothing personal, it's just my style and I tend do it with everyone. And my only objection to your postings was in regards to flat statements you were making that I felt to be in error.

It's just that erotic candid photography is a side niche that everybody is aware of but few actually understand. The entire niche is not a "gray area" as many people think, though there is work within it that is unlawful and even illegal (such as invasive voyeurism photos). Also, a lot of the water has been muddied recently in the mass media with sensationalized "Video Voyeur" programs and the irresponsible behavior of some of the major event coverage players (ie. GGW and AMX).

I've worked the niche exclusively now for 10 years and, during that time, I've made some original contributions to it. Without going into details or trying to sound like I'm wagging my dick here, let's just say that I do know what I'm talking about on this one subject. You're certainly welcome to stop by www.iiiii.com and see exactly what I'm about.

Thanks for the link iiiii's.
Do you know your linking to a shitload of stolen content?

???

Since that site is primarily used to showcase my own original work, I don't understand your statement. Please show us some examples of this "stolen content".

from your links page:
http://www.mardi-gras-flashers.com/linx.html

for starters: http://www.voyeur24x7.com/php/in.php?id=fiveyes

and you say: "One of my favorite sites on the Web (for some odd reason :) "

no worries, I'm taking care of them one by one as usual

I'm quite used to it, been doing it for years.....

I think I know how you arrived at that mistaken conclusion. Before my recent opening of my content store (see sig) I've been quetly supplying a number of major sites for quite some time. Also, during the heyday of the newsgroups, I was a prolific poster into them, even created the alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.voyeurism group to share some of my early work, and a large number of early voyeurism sites picked up my images and used them.

So, I guess this is simply a case of you finding the "mother lode" and failing to realize it. :) But all of my work is provably mine, since I do register the video tapes I produce with the Library of Congress.

A top list? You were talking about a top list that one of my sites link to?!?

Well, thank-you for clearing that up! Your post seemed to imply www.iiiii.com lead directly to a cache of stolen images.

no dude, i know who you are, known of you for years, i know you don't rip content, just letting you know that sites that you are linking to use stolen content.

like i said earlier: your linking to stolen content
NOT: you have stolen content

there is a difference
was just thanking you for posting the link to it and bringing it to my attention.

Cheers,
BV

No prob, link's gone now. Since I don't do anything but hard link trades from a strong SE traffic base, I don't need to be dealing with a questionable site like that. Thanks for bringing it to my attention.

You are welcome to just change that link to me. I will take that traffic.:glugglug

Yeah Im off to Rio in Brazil to shoot a ton of that

they don't look like hard links to me, look like toplist rank code links????

like this one: http://www.newtoplists.com/cgi-bin/d...es.cgi?fiveyes

thats similar to the last one you just killed???

anyways this toplist is linking to more of my shit!!!:feels-hot

sent letters to the host already

http://www.hotfreehost.com/www/jeka/free.upskirt11/

http://www.hotfreehost.com/www/jeka/...index/im01.jpg



http://www.hotfreehost.com/www/jeka/free.upskirt10/

http://www.hotfreehost.com/www/jeka/...index/im03.jpg
http://www.hotfreehost.com/www/jeka/...index/im07.jpg
http://www.hotfreehost.com/www/jeka/...index/im06.jpg
http://www.hotfreehost.com/www/jeka/...index/im08.jpg