![]() |
Acacia is not the one to blame
Blame the patent office that granted them the patent without obviously doing much research into whether video over the internet already existed.
If the patent office had done a more thorough job back in 1991, I doubt anyone would be talking about Acacia today. Broad patent claims like this should be scrutinized extremely hard by the patent office before being granted. So everyone give a big one finger salute to the US Patent and Trademark Office :321GFY |
Ugh. give it a rest idiot
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
No BB, it's your inane and obsessant attempts to infuriate others or make other assinine statements that tic people off. You can go giggle yourself to sleep now. Maybe you will forget to wake up. Feel free to think you made some sort of "score" with this post. I'm sure others with at least a 10 yr olds intelligence and maturity will just want you to drown the next time you Mork from Ork attempt to potty.
|
Quote:
|
I said "Attempts" lmao
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Yes, a fucking brown bear, who obviously posesses a jd (no doubt board certified in patent law) has an issue with the US patent office's dilligence????? We ALL fucking disagree with ACACIA's filings, but please. If you are going to attempt a serious post at least make an effort to substantiate your claims, otherwise stick it on one of the 500 other threads regarding ACACIA. or just stick to TNB and talk about your 10 dollar a day sales. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:55 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123