Why do "photographers" have to them getting blown by the content girl?
 

Is this the new trend or what?

On alot of set that I buy, I see these "photraphers" screwing or getting a BJ by the content girls and most of the time I can't use these pics.

I as a content maker would never do that and any that are , well they are just here for the game and think they are cool , there is no way in hell i would do that shit , and i damn sure wouldnt do it if i was there in the usa making content , not with all the laws there .
A person doing this is any thing but a buisness man , or a pro at this , they are careless and just a out right dumb ass

The problems that can come out from it all is alot and i sure wouldnt want it down the line ,
a girl can say any thing on how she was forced to fuck him and suck him to make the content so she could get paid ,
so again to me a content maker doing this i wouldnt buy from them , and if this is a prob you seemt o be having then i would tell you to go find a new makers , ya there is alot that might be doing this , i there damn sure is alot that think the same way i do and would never do this ...

:2 cents: :2 cents:

Uhmmm, over the shoulder and you fell for it. That's fine,
your surfers will to and it'll convert.

There is a huge difference between a professional photographer and some who wants to be a photographer and get their dick sucked.

Quite.

cause it feels good?

Yes, I am also piss of by these kind of photos, but we have enough of this around to make a niche site of it :)

Also in Videos, just check the Casting Stuff
http://www.skan-media.net

So it's not to prove to the buyers (webmasters) that their girls are fuckable?:1orglaugh

um so you are saying what I do is wrong and other amateurs that shoot content like this is wrong or am I reading this wrong?

There are already 179 sentence structure, punctuation, and spelling violations on this thread.

Under violation of GFY section 1247, subsection 17, I hereby give notice that this thread will hurt your eyes.

:1orglaugh I just want to know if this guy really thinks this away, cause I shoot alot of content for my sites, and for a few friends and I find it easier then trying to find a guy that can keep his cock up through out the whole shoot, and ANNNNND I do myself get tired of it that is another reason I offer my members a chance to fuck my models for free, guess what im saying is I didnt like his comments about putting everyone together in shooting content. just my :2 cents:
TOM

i believe at that level it becomes prositution.. instead of being a producer paying to film sex acts, you are paying for recieving sex acts and/or partipating in sex acts.

just my :2 cents: it deosn't really matter what your intentions where, you phsyically are doing it.. get caught have fun proving it.

There is?

Oh - yea...right!

There sure is :winkwink:

What about amateur sites, though? I think that's what Tom was asking, and I'm interested as well. There are other amateurs here on the board who shoot this style of content...are they wrong, too? It's a different niche, the way I see it.

However, I DO think that since it's a uniquely amateur style of shooting, it probably isn't going to be appropriate for content that's shot to sell to others...is that what you're trying to get at?

It is different for you, you "are" your site. :)

lots of buyers request that kind of stuff - get asked for it all the time - prefer not too, but that's just me . . . . specify to the content provider what you want and you won't get that stuff. no big deal really (what's a bj between friends?)

Personally,
i understand the need for it sometimes, but as a photographer, i do not subscribe to the practice.
If you need BJ content from a model, and there is no "Stunt Cock" present, use what you got.
Some sites bank on the Audition factor of BJ and Sex with the talent. I would still use a male model other than myself.
It does help with the Lucky Bastard shots, but you can also stand over the dudes shoulder and take pics this way.
As for the Prostitution aspect of it, nude modeling or lewd activities for pay by definition is prostitution.....
I am all up for ladies that are willing to do this type of work being paid for the services, it is just symantics of definition. I think prostitution should be legal worldwide with health checks....
Some of these guys also can't get laid without the practice. they look at naked pics all day, work long hours, gotta pay the models, and then go whack of after? So long as the model is cool with it, i say go for it.

Have i switched back and forth enough in this post????

:2 cents:

As a photographer who enjoys a good rapport with anyone I choose to shoot, solo posing or interaction, I would be cautious to add another guy and potential drama to a shoot.

I've shot couples before, and was shocked how many boyfriends couldn't perform. I know a dozen guys who would kill to be a stunt cock, but they don't have a good work ethic or concern for the female model...

Figure if a photographer does it himself, he is cutting costs. Some female models I have spoken to actually prefer it that way as well, especially if they are doing other work with him.

I don't think you see it as much with more mainstream or glossy porn shoots, but for amateur style it doesn't seem out of place.

pov is big biz, btw I photograph sex on a weekly basis, yes it is nice to cut cost. in any biz it's nice to cut cost.

now about dicks: anyone who truley shoots BG on a daliy or weekly basis knows that 95% of boys can't perform. even the pro boys have off days.

now about girls: some girls don't mind working with a photog and some do. NBD. everybody has different dreams.

Depends on the situation... If you're doing it FOR the shoot, that's one thing.. if you're doign it because there's honest mutual attraction, ok.. But then take it out of the business context. If someone's just doing it to show how much pussy he can get from models.. I dunno that just never flew too well with me. I had a few models who wanted more than a business relationship.. I generally stopped working with them and kept it personal though.

i guess its a perk of having a job like that. I do think it could make
for trouble.

I agree. 90% of the photographers in this business are around for the wrong reasons. But then again, so are 90% of their customers.

what if the photographer gives himself a salary for being sucked, is that still prostitution since you got paid to be sucked??

I think maybe he's talking about the niche where the surfer sees the sex from his own (the cameraman's) perspective. If the actual model is really being exploited that's bad of course, but isn't that view (the photographer/camera having sex) just a specific type of content that some surfers ask for?

i rather just make money off the content then get a STD

hmm...i wonder who you have in mind when saying this:1orglaugh


i have no opinion on the subject...i still get all giddy when i see naked chicks:)

And if the huge difference existed anywhere other than your imagination, I'm sure someone would care.

I always get a blow job...but I do it after the main filming has ended and never turn the camera on....works wonders....

std's are a real issue working with models that's for sure - we're all tested monthly for hiv and a few other assorted bugs, howver: herpes, genital warts . . . etc. are alive and well in the biz. as far as whos in the biz for what reason, not my call. I'm a shooter, not a judge. I 'll let my work do the talking - and hopefully I'm not putting my foot in my mouth metaphysically speaking ;}

Actually yeah have you seen www.povporn.com this guy has awesome content..awesome girls and his site rocks....

I have a lovely bunch of Coco-nuts... POV rules!

Thanks. Husler video thinks it's cool too - they just bought the video from my site for distribution on high res DVD & Video - so other people besides me must like it. Toodles!http://www.povporn.com/Gallery/Jade/14.jpg

see the whole gallery here http://www.povporn.com/Gallery/Jade/index.html

prostock said:
>The problems that can come out from it all is alot and i sure wouldnt want it down the line ,
>a girl can say any thing on how she was forced to fuck him and suck him to make the content so she could >get paid
Are you confessing you never figured out how to structure your business, your contracts and your shooting methodology in such a way as to offer models a huge dis-incentive for abusing you frivolously?

RocHard said:
>There is a huge difference between a professional photographer and some who wants to be a
>photographer and get their dick sucked.
Are you telling us that it is impossible for photographic competence and cocksmanship to coexist in the same guy ?

LadyMischief added-on to RocHard
>Quite.
Didn't I hear rumors of a certain female photographer bragging about the many model's pussies she sucked?

va2k said:
>um so you are saying what I do is wrong and other amateurs that shoot content like this is wrong or am I
>reading this wrong?
What is right about worrying about other's opinion of what is right or wrong?

lordfrost said
>I am all up for ladies that are willing to do this type of work being paid for the services, it is just symantics >of definition. I think prostitution should be legal worldwide with health checks....
Is prostitution illegal in Canada? Is it in the USA ?

LadyMischief said:
>Depends on the situation... If you're doing it FOR the shoot, that's one thing..
Did you really believe that James Bond does it only for England?

>if you're doign it
>because there's honest mutual attraction, ok.. But then take it out of the business context.
Seriously, WHY ? What's the rationale for that?

>If someone's just doing it to show how much pussy he can get from models.. I dunno that just
>never flew too well with me. I had a few models who wanted more than a business
>relationship.. I generally stopped working with them and kept it personal though.
Speaking of flying, Top Gun, what is it that Ice coughed while Maverick bragged about this his Mig-29 encounter?

BradShaw said:
>I agree. 90% of the photographers in this business are around for the wrong reasons. But then again, so
>are 90% of their customers.

Can you explain me what would be a "good" reason ?

BMB said:
>std's are a real issue working with models that's for sure - we're all tested monthly for hiv and >a few other assorted bugs
HIV test's validity is strongly questionned...

> howver: herpes, genital warts . . . etc. are alive and well in the biz.
The Pharaohs had herpes in 4000BC; we have herpes. It's part of the human condition.
Get over it.







Veni Vidi Vici

I have no one in particular. It puzzle me to see these "photographers" selling me sets of them getting blown by the content girl.