SexEducation...time to defend yourself
 

So you wanted a thread of your own to defend that you didn't have kiddie porn and you aren't a sick child molesting cock.

So here is the thread. Defend yourself. Tell us you didn't have kiddie porn on your site. Tell us why you wanted minors to access your members section to see hardcore sex pictures. Tell us you have never touched a child in a sexual way.

Come on rimlicker. Time to give your side of the story.

what did i miss? update me

This should be interesting ...
no problem ...

First - what specifically - what graphic - what article - what text are you asking me to defend?

I give you permission to copy my website for the purpose of this discussion.

For this thread - ONLY!

Go get it - past or present - and post what you would like me to defend - here in this thread.

What specifically are you referring to?

I mean the acqusations that you HAD kiddie porn on your site, that you had a section on your site saying the members area was intented for adults or children with adult supervision.

Don't fuckin play around. Who cares what your fuckin site is like now. Defend yourself on what has been said about you. We are smart enough here to see you trying to avoid the issues.

It's a review..who needs your permission? Or are you forgetting the "permission" you didn't get for the copyrighted material you had on your site... I think I'll dig up the thread...

Here's the sad shits site and details....

Yep... and *I* got slammed.. check that other thread.. I got so owned I can't even stand it! :)

exactly ....

no responce to the question.

more fluff and fodder ...

Remember in all the previous posts you said you already had screen captures ...

censor them ...
lets see them ...

come on - you're the best in the business right ...

What specifically do you want me to defend except your continuous emotions about controversial subjects?

All I know is if someone called me a child molestor and having kiddie porn, I would be defending myself all over the fucking place, not skirting around the issue.

This malaka is too dumb to even realize this. He thinks he can outsmart us by having us look at his current site.

Until he defends himself, I see him as the lowest scum on the earth. There is a reason why child molestors get treated the worst in prison...even convict felons think child molestation is the immoral.

Dude......



FUCK YOU


You fucking chester

Lets have it ...

come on - where is the child pornography you say I have ...

censor it ... but post it ...

come on ...

there is none and you know it too ...

I am sorry that my writing touched your emotions ...
it is meant to ...

some of the "sex stuff" of this world is NOT nice ...

but get off my back ...
there is no topic barred at SexEducation.com ... including the ones you do not like ...

Holy shit your stupid fuck. You were called a child molestor and a kiddie porn sick fuck. I would go off so fast and defend myself if that happened to me.

I want you to defend what others are saying about you since I have never saw your site before. Since you won't defend yourself, I am inclined to believe what was written.

Just answer these simple questions...even a small bus moron like yourself should be able to answer.

1. Did you have kiddie porn on your site?
2. Did you have any pictures of minors on your site that were nude?
3. Did you have something on your site saying that children or teens can access your members section with adult supervision?
4. Have you ever been in trouble with the law about sex with minors or anything of that nature?

Your site sucks and so do you.:321GFY :321GFY :321GFY

We don't need to show it. Your site has changed, it is that fuckin simple.

Just defend yourself and answer the fucking questions.

You deny it, and demand proof. That seems like a fine defense.

However, it is slightly undermined by saying that your site includes everything, including things that we don't like.

Are you saying it is okay for you to have child porn, or that you don't have it? Making both arguments at the same time doesn't look good.

I wouldn't comprimise them for the authorities.. they already have uncensored versions.

LadyMischief:

OK "Dad" is gonna get a visit shortly. Don't know when, but he may have to leave the thread kinda unexpectedly :1orglaugh

I want to see frank, direct answers to all of these questions. A simple yes or no will do.

1/3 down the front page

1. Yes he did.
2. Yes, he did.
3. It's still there.
4. The police say so.

WEll I have nothing to do with it, but I'm certainly not going to cry :)

"You deny it and demand proof. ... .."

Curious - well ya. Remember innocent until proven guilty.

Only she [LADY] is saying this - yet am I guilty?

She says - she has proof - where is it?

Well - where is yours?

Where is this CP?

roflmao

Who wants to get a little pool of money together to buy this guy tickets to Internext. Have a little "Round Table" discussion with him?

Lets see him skirt the issues with the adult community right in front of him.

Fucking sick fuck wouldn't have the balls, I would bet.

The hardcore image of the couple having sex, provide documentation that they are in fact over 18. Considering I doubt you even legally have license to that, you won't be able to give me proof that they're of age, will you?

Then why don't you answer my fucking questions I posted? Defend yourself asshole. I want to hear your side of the fucking story, along with others here. You are sounding more fucking guilty by the second.

LadyMischief:
I have no problem admitting I am a "grass" on CP offenders :glugglug

People are getting informed as we speak, little fool.

Hit me up on icq malaka :)

Whats your ICQ number?

LADYMISCHIEF: if you wish to post a complaint about any post on my website - do so on record with SexEducation.com.

Any one can.

Send you email to SE_DAD at SexEducation.com and your post will become permanent record.

Except - unlike here - it is a magazine of truth.

The fluff and fodder is not allowed.

You would be requested to state your opinion about a particular quote comment or article.

Accusations without a presentation of reason are not permitted.
In otherwords, what specific graphic or article do you disagree with? What page? What post? follow ... my website does not allow you to slander without proof ...

and that is why it really is a magazine ... not a UBB ...

follow?

email or icq me :)
3522039 or email [email protected]

3522039

Like I would post to your useless website.. My beef has been filed with the proper authorities, as have the "beefs" of many others. It's not a matter of "disagreeing". It's a matter of law. You're breaking it. Multiple times.. Get a clue.

Your sick fuck. You have been called the lowest of the fuckin low in society. You still haven't answered my questions. Why are you avoiding them?

Yo Guido :) Drama level needs to go up.

What the fuck are you laughing about you fuckin dickhead.
Has there been one funny thing mentioned in this thread yet. If so I must have missed it. You are being accused of cp dude the lowest possible thing on the planet and your laughing. You are a fucking scumbag man.

malakajoe: sorry bud ... if I didn't understand your question...

could you please repeat it?
a one sentence question - what is it?

1. Did you have kiddie porn on your site?
2. Did you have any pictures of minors on your site that were nude?
3. Did you have something on your site saying that children or teens can access your members section with adult supervision?
4. Have you ever been in trouble with the law about sex with minors or anything of that nature?


This is the third post listing these questions.

Answer the numbered questions.

I will paraphrase, in case you didn't understand....

1. Have you, at any time, had photographs of a sexual nature featuring children under the age of 18 on your site?

2. Have you, at any time, had photographs of children under the age of 18 naked on your site?

3. Has your site, at any time, stated that it was acceptable for children under the age of 18 to view the inside of the site with parental guidance?

4. Have you ever been accused, convicted, or charged with a sex offense?

LadyMischief:

Sorry LM.. will hit you on ICQ in a moment... you know if the idiots name something like Beecock?

1. Did you have kiddie porn on your site?
2. Did you have any pictures of minors on your site that were nude?
3. Did you have something on your site saying that children or teens can access your members section with adult supervision?
4. Have you ever been in trouble with the law about sex with minors or anything of that nature?


#1: NO
#2: YES
#3: Still do.
#4: No
#4a ... never been phoned or contacted about my website either. And have tried but can not seem to make an appointment to even go to the Calgary Police station to present in person - my child pornography article - that I though I did a good job of - discussing a very controversial subject. I will adjust it - but no-one has made a formal request to do so.

I'm just in the middle of helping you get that appointment... so just hang in there!

Yep.. icq me :)

So more questions for you.

1. You think having nude minors is not kiddie porn?
2. Is it illegal to have nude pictures of minors on your pc?
3. Why is it ok for minors to see pictures of hardcore sexual intercourse?
4. Why do you use the nickname dad?
5. Are you a member of NAMBLA?
6. Do you support NAMBLA?
7. Do you get aroused looking at naked pictures of minors?

Interesting. I really expected you to continue to dodge the questions. Instead, you have given some scary true answers, and (I suspect) lied a bit...

On #1 and #2, I suspect that your naked photos of children will also be of a sexual nature, even if they don't contain sex. Even if what you have done is "barely" legal, it's pretty nasty.

On #3, I can only say that you are probably breaking a number of laws in presenting adult material to minors.

On #4, I can only say that I suspect it won't be long before we see proof otherwise.

In #4a, I have to admit I don't understand what you're talking about.

LadyMischief:

K! Thanks!! I better shut up for a moment :glugglug