![]() |
SPOTBROKERS are CHEATERS? - SOLID PROOF - read here
Spotbrokers are NOT cheaters.
I say AGIAN SPOTBROKERS ARE NOT CHEATERS. I know BOTH Kimmykim and Backov Personally. They are STAND UP PEOPLE. I STAND BEHIND THEM 10000000% None of these fucking supposed cheating assholes will ever show their faces at a convention. WHY - cause they are cheating theives. PERIOD. it's rare to find a webmaster event that kimmykim or backov havn't been to. WHY is that? Cause they havn't cheated ANYONE and arn't AFRAID to show their faces in public. it's that simple. Spotbrokers in reality is a competator of mine - as my main business is selling ad space and galleries on sleazydream. So ask yourself this - whyt he hell would I invite the two of them to my TGP VIP parties? (and I'm VERY picky about who I invite)- the answer is simple. They are a class act, through and through. They arn't out to steal my business, and I trust them. STRONG WORDS from a COMPETATOR. Spotbrokers is also SMART ENOUGH to know when someone is CHEATING THEM. GUESS WHAT Cheaters - they CAUGHT YOU. Spotbrokers should send you a bill for wasting their time and trying to defraud them. And anyone who deals with these cheaters should know that from this day on it will be a LOT more difficult to get good trades if you continue to support THEIVES. Know that if they are cheating spotbrokers then they are 100% for sure also cheating you on your trades. |
Quote:
KimmyKim and Backov are stand up people, and anyone who knows them agree. Keep fighting them cheaters!:thumbsup |
Oh my, I am finally getting to go to the 3l337 party???
Holy shit! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
That's a valid point... yet totally 1 sided. No one said they cheat... only that Run said he was cheated. Alot of good webmaster don't go to the conventions becuse they live 1000's of miles away... like Eastern Europe. But like I said... you make a damn good one sided argument. |
airfare from lithuania to a convention might be a little steep.
|
:sleep
|
Quote:
it's the cheaters that don't want to show their faces that don't go. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
ummm, only if your'e a cheater and keep getting your checks cancelled |
Nice attention whore thread title :321GFY
|
sleazy can i be your date for your next party?
... i put out... :Graucho |
P.S. I use spot brokers from time to time. So I'm not biased. I have about 30,000 hits left in my account right now.
|
jUICY
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Who said that Spotbrokers were cheaters? Not many people did anyway, most just wanted the full story and/or some proof. It seems like that was all the accused wanted as well. The only person being called a cheater left and right was that run guy. He seems to be just as legit as Kimmy Kim, he does business with major TGP guys you're friends with. Who's word are we supposed to take, 12clicks? GFY post count doesn't mean anything to most people (hopefully). It seems like run was really being insulted by a group of friends standing up for each other, when all he was asking for were answers. He didn't really come out and say that he got ripped off did he? :2 cents:
|
P.P.S. I also have bought a RB4 script from Run... he's legit... that must be why that thread was sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooo
long I've dealt with Run and I use spot brokers. I recommend both of them. |
It's past your bedtime Rich, you'll be late for the am shift at this rate.
|
I will say it just 1 more time.
I'm not on either side of this battle and have 0 vested interest except for how this business operates. Not another business would think about accusing a vendor of "cheating," stop payment on checks and not expect to have to show proof. If you pulled this in the brick and mortar world you'd have collection agencies on your ass, your credit could be ruined, and your ass taken to court, who knows maybe even criminal charges of fraud could be levied. But when this occurs it always seems to occur to a webmaster who would be wise just to chalk it up as a loss or suffer the expenses of a long trip to America to fight a battle that could be strung out for a good long while. A money program might win the financial battle, but it does not mean they would have necessarily proven their case in court. I hate cheaters as much as anyone, but honestly I can't wait until some of these companies get checked in court on what is their standard operating procedure. Sure cheaters deserve to be punished, but there has to be some procedures in place to make sure that neither side will abuse what we all value, and that is trust. |
Quote:
I bet KK would hate that... :) The business world is as fair as the people you deal with. |
Quote:
As for your illusions with the brick and mortar world, um, let me disabuse you. If run (or any other cheater for that matter) was working in or on my premises and got caught stealing from me, red handed, I'd call the police. They'd lock him up, he'd make bail and then the judge would decide what to do with him. In the meantime his name would be in the papers, he'd be in disgrace, and then when court time came he'd be punished again. As for so called standard operating procedure, theres a thing called terms. Try reading them before you send someone traffic. |
Quote:
I know in some TOS that you agree with in order to use their program it specifically states that if there is any litigation that it has to be brought forth in the city, state, and county that the business is set up in. |
Quote:
it's an IMPRESSIVE resume. dumbass |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Here was my first post to you today: Quote:
Is that incredibly unreasonable, when the person who claims to have been wrong is credible in at least one of the circles you are? This is the first response to me, from your buddy 12clicks. Quote:
I just don't get why automatically you and 12clicks are right, and this guy and the people who vouch for him are not. You're playing with peoples income here, talking about where they live isn't good enough, if you don't want people from that region, do what 12clicks does and don't let them join. I know you're going to respond by telling me to go to my job at McDonalds, and believe me, it will be clever. But you can't say the point I (and many, many other people in those 11 pages) am trying to make doesn't exist. |
eroswebmaster - start paying per click and see just how quick your business outlook on these people in question changes.........
|
Quote:
That's usually the way it works unless you are a well known cheater. As for your "on premises" theory that doesn't hold here, you're dealing with vendors, independent contractors and this did not occur on your premises. If it did you'd also have to file a complaint. The complaint would be investigated to see if charges would be made. He would then have the luxury of being told what the criminal charge is, and he would be INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY. Your system is set up so that people are guilty based upon your word. You are the accuser, the jury and the judge. And as far as reading your terms, this is not an issue about your terms. If you can prove he violated those you're fine, but you offer no proof, like I said you just made the accusation, found him guilty and meted out his punishment. This once again would not, could not occur between vendors in the brick and mortar world without there being consequences on both ends. |
KimmyKim,
I bought my traffic on Sunday 6/22 ! Was this after you caught the bot ? Thank you, Julene |
RICH - arn't you a casino guy?
Casinos are the most dishonest businesses, bar none, on the web. |
The real proof lies in the fact that it is not in spotbroker's (or any service-type company's) best interest to can their clients unless they have absolute proof that such an extreme action is necessary. Period.
And for the record, if I found someone cheating any program of mine in some way, I would instantly discontinue their account as well, and I'll be damned if someone like xxweaklingxx or bitch would be trying to demand I prove it. For one, they're not in a position to demand shit, and for another, it isn't in Kimmy's or Backov's interest to lie about it. In run's case the choices are simple: See a lawyer, keep crying on the board, or shut the hell up. Can anyone think of a fourth choice for run? |
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'm sure there is a reasonable expectation of loss, every business I've ran you have to factor that in. I'm not saying that people should not be punished for cheating. I just don't like the idea that a company can just say "you are a cheater so we won't pay you," and there being no recourse if this company is incorrect, or made a mistake, or are just plain cheats themselves. |
Quote:
:glugglug |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
As a business owner I believe you have the right to choose who you wish to do business with that is not the issue. Disable their accounts if you don't like them...but to just keep their money based upon your accusation of cheating is just not enough in my opinion. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
If I was fired from my job and not given a reason, my only option would be to sue my former employer for wrongful discharge. My case would be brought to court, my employer would bring proof/reasons as to why I was fired, and a judge and jury would decided on whether or not I was wrongfully discharged. Internet scenario: Run was terminated from the program and not given a solid reason. His only option is to sue Spotbrokers. I'm not sure what the exact charge would be. His case would be brought to court, Spotbrokers would bring proof of is cheating, and a judge and jury would decide whether or not he was actually cheating. Tell me how these two scenarios are different. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
please sue me for that slander......... |
Sleazy there are a lot of hitbotters in TGP, you don't see me calling you a cheat. I've never been accused of anything dishonest, not many people in gamming, or adult for that matter, can say that.
|
Quote:
If I'm fired by a local employer and can prove wrongful termination I don't have to travel 1,000's of miles to sue them. They are more than likely in the city I reside in. My costs would not include air fare from eastern europe, hotel costs etc. And you know a court case could be drawn out so any webmaster with a half a grain of intelligence would know this is not financially feasible. Because there would be many trips back and forth to the states, the travel expenses alone would be way more than what's at stake here. So all this grandstanding of SB stating...come on sue us! doesn't prove anything other than that they have the upper hand in the mexican standoff. |
Quote:
We credited the buyers accounts. Hello, anyone? anyone? Bueller? |
Quote:
|
grabbing my page 1 post!!!
|
Quote:
Personally, I'd do it, financially feasible or not, just for the principle. And I don't have money to throw around. |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:42 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123