![]() |
Bryan 166773501
Dildozer :
R U for real, or only jerking my chain? I am trying to reach you at (718) 894-XXXX (the # you provided to me) a number of times & the (516) 627-XXXX # U gave me, a lady denies anyone expecting a call from me (Lawrence). & it is Not a shared phone. I have left several messages at (718) 894-XXXX once again today not long ago, chk again, pls, thnx (are you messing with me?) Hey, friend, with all due respect, I am trying, to act in response to what you expressed to me, and had started and initiated, in your messages to me...... Remember you repeatedly urged me insistently.... ...Your asking, prompting, & requesting, urgently for me to call you! I have been trying. :) ?????? ? |
|
:)
Dildozer, :) I'm still trying to reach you at (718) 894-XXXX at your prompting in request for me to do so. As I haven't contacted you yet via telephone as was your expressed wish for me to do, I shall keep up my attempts to call at the telephone number you had provided me repeatedly in may urgins for me to call and talk with you on the phone, as per our messages in these threads at this board site and also even much more expressed in messages from you to me via ICQ promptimg and urging me to telephone you at that same phone # you provided to me, for the purpose of me to call you, implicitly that it would be a number I would be able to reach you at, and that you wanted me to reach you via that telephone number and talk to you on the phone instead of anything further or involved via ICQ IM. I find it curious after many attempts of mine in calling this (718)894-XXXX and leaving messages many times, also even speaking with persons at that end, that today after a few tries again, there is today a FAX machine connected to that line. =-----= You know, (? (I hope) ! ) if "one" were messing with anyone else (me) by giving them a phone number of an uninvolved third party who wouldn't be expecting any such call, like giving a fake or random number, falsely representing yourself, with a # that is not yours, also falsely representing the actual holder of that phone #, it would be not a harmless funny joke that is cool, or anything like that, but, be needless juvenile antics close to harrassing behavior, because of the fact of "one" giving out bogus contact information of a phone number that is not your own, which ends up having people at that end (the phone # given which is Not the persons to give out as if to call the person playing a prank) where that phone is not expecting calls getting calls they do not expect, and may not be clear enough why it is happening right away, with possibly ambiguous understanding of what was happening, like maybe it still being ineffecting communication / miscommunication problems instead of immediately assuming it represents a mere senseless prank, which shouldn't have to be a persons first guess of what is happening in honest attempts to reach a person who has asked someone to call them. In short if you were just messing with me, it's shame on you, not shame on me. Like = Dildozer : is this you? Brett L****r, (718) 894-****, 6**8 76th St, Middle Village, NY 11379 http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&i...=Google+Search If not, you shouldn't be giving out that phone number to anyone as if it is how to call you. Ready for a demotion to elementary school? Or just maybe to sit in the corner for the whole day? Or get a spanking or have you hand cracked with a ruler? WHAT gives, my immature vexatious friend? Lawrence Connor represents himself straightforwardly and on the level without no crap & nonsense. Would you like for me to call you still? What was your point? YOU have the dunce cap on your head, not me, that was this point. A small meaningless thing to play a trick, but who it reflects porrly on more significantly, IS YOU for doing it. Lawrence Connor - Lawrence Connor - Lawrence Connor :GFYBand |
Bryan is Lyin'.
Dildozer is dicking with me AND the person who actually has the phone # Dildozer gave to me for me to call Dildozer. Dildozer is a dildo and a dozer (half-conscious?) for fucking with that guy & me, as I have it confirmed that he was trying to get at that guy (Brett in NY) over some stupid dispute that was a misunderstanding on the Dildo's (Dildozer) part, too. I called again, a short while ago today, and learned this and about that concerning the number I had been trying, and the related dispute and petty behavior, because the Dildo (Dildozer) told me to call him via that # when he gave it to me, Bryan, this is messed up. This meaningless trick and these antics, please reflect and regard why you did this and if you would have appreciated getting this trick played on you (me or the other guy with that Tel. #). |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:13 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123