![]() |
Sue the shavers?
I know there has been alot of talk about sponsors shaving on this board.
If that is the case couldn't that be grounds for a huge lawsuit? If someone were to break a shaver and won the lawsuit wouldn't all those who were promoting theier program be entitled to settlement? What are your thoughts? |
Yes and I would happily sue anyone I KNEW shaved me and not say "Oh but they still convert better".
|
How do you prove an amount to sue for? How do you prove they're shaving? How do you account for sponsors changing their payouts the day before court ("Terms and conditions may change at any time without notice").....
So who's shaving now? |
have your lawyer demand to login directly to the processor thru the reseller account.. that's proof right there :Graucho
|
Why would anyone use a sponsor? They all shave in one way or another. Trust nobody.
|
I myself am not the brightest, but I have to believe that if this practice is being done there must be someone out there doing some investigating, documenting, etc.
It would be newsworthy to say the least. |
yeah.... prove someone's shaving... the only way you're gonna prove that is to have the co. in question actually testify in court that they shave., and that aint gonna happen. get over it, deal with it... companies shave to stay in business. if they go out of business, who the fuck are you gonna promote?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Couldn't they structure things to be truthful? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
If you had proof, sure you could sue. It's the same as any company not paying their salesmen what they've earned. If some pissed off whistle blower ever sneaks info to the authorities and they investigate, in theory it's possible. The GFY drama would be off the wall.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Having said that, it would be money well spent, especially if it was a big program. |
Quote:
|
I guess I'm not alone in my analysis.
Look what I found on another board.... http://chat.ynotmasters.com/public/C...04&Site_ID=yno |
What do the morning people have to say about this?
|
Sueing these programs would probably be a waste of time and
money. All the large ones are incorporated, most likely with leased equipment and buildings. They have very little real value to attach, and the corpotate status protects the assets of the owners. It would also be nearly impossible to prove that they actually shave. Anyone with some experience could make the company records change to their advantage since they are contained in a computer database. Understand, I have no experience with possible sponsor shaving. I don't know whether they do or don't. I do know that a reasonable person should expect what I would call "incidental shaving". A certain percentage of referrals are going to get lost in the signup process. Different browsers and surfer actions could corrupt the java-forwarding and/or cookie state so that, by the time the signup is made, the sponsor honestly doesn't know where it came from. I think the advice above...live with it and stay with the best converting sponsors...is probably the best way to go. |
Only TRUE way to prove they don't shave is when these large sponsors allow you to login to the actual proccessor stats page to see if it matches with your stats.
Kinda of like how oxcash does but unfortunately they are just partnership program |
... nobody shaves ... period !
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
good point,, that ain't 100% either |
"This isn't "cheating" as they refer to it, it's fraud and someone is going to get fed up and sue making headlines that will make the Enron scandal look like a sunday afternoon walk in the park. The news networks would just eat it up. Dragging ALL of us into the scandal
Can you see it? "Porn kingpins steal billions from unwary business men." There would certainly end up being federal investigations into these practices and new laws passed to control it. " \--------------------------------------- I'm really sorry to burst someone's bubble here but this just makes me laugh so hard I couldn't pass it up. At the end of the day, most of you are worrying about the wrong things entirely. Who pays you the most for your traffic? |
Quote:
WG |
Quote:
its dishonest and bullshit. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
WG |
Quote:
|
SHAVE HAPPENS :glugglug
|
Quote:
I don't know what the uproar is all about, you can thank your peers -- the cheating ass resellers -- if they weren't ripping off the sponsors then the sponsors wouldn't need to constantly try to figure out how to improve their margins. It's just like shoplifting, someone is going to pay the price. |
Quote:
what do they actually do? they increase prices or eat the costs. |
Quote:
All it takes is one disgruntled employee and one pissed off affiliate and, if this truly is an industry practice, the entire house of cards will come crumbling down. -joe |
It's (relatively) easy to prove who's shaving, we tested it with 2 big programs we were suspicious about and bingo! one of them shaved at about 25% an the other almost 50%, test ran in a week. We approached the program guys, one of them magically stopped the shaving machine (at least for the account in question) and the other simply terminated the test account. They promised 35 PS, but in fact they were paying little more than 17.50 . Anyway, for common people or people living out of the countries where these programs are based, sueing them is just a waste of time and money. Plus, you can prove it for yourself, but not sure if it's enough proof for a judge, prolly not (even when it could be "reasonable doubt")
And no, won't say which programs are those because we ocassionally work for them in other areas, so if you're curious, run your own test :winkwink: |
Once again we come back to this subject. It seems to be coming on more and more, and it's only a matter of time before something happens.
I've said it a thousand times before.... If you want to know who shaves, go to the shows, find the programmers, and get them drunk. They'll tell you all you need to know. It wouldn't be too hard to prove if someone shaves in a court if needed. The programs themselves aren't the only ones that have records - So do banks, and so do the credit card companies. In our case, Lightspeed Media uses CCBill as our primary credit card processer. A simple court order to CCBill to get their records, and compare it to ours and you can tell where the truth is. (For the record I will state that Lightspeed Cash does not shave in any way, shape or form, nor could we if we wanted to. ) It's only a matter of time before some programmer quits and wants to raise hell and exposes the truth. When it happenes - with any luck - a class action lawsuit will take place with hundreds of webmasters in it...... I'd love to see this. I'm all for taking out the trash. |
Quote:
-joe |
Quote:
|
It is a big deal. And the sponsors who have nothing to hide are beginning to make cc post-back data available to 3rd party auditors, ClickTruth
Sloooowly we become a real industry. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Do I smell a 20/20? 60 mintues?
|
There are a shitload that do but what can you do. U have to prove it first
|
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:49 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123