New Girl In Outdoor Settings
 

Here's my latest little coed cutie. Just got back from shooting her at a couple different locations in the Cascades southwest of Salem, Oregon.

http://www.girlsdotcom.com/Temp/Woodsy3.jpg

http://www.girlsdotcom.com/Temp/Woodsy1.jpg

http://www.girlsdotcom.com/Temp/Woodsy2.jpg

I just LOVE this girls legs and butt.

Tell her to crack a smile *I'll pay for the stitches*

Cute, but moody.

How do you resist leaning forward and taking a little lick when shooting a pose like that? I couldn't.

Not bad, but a smile wouldn't hurt.

Oz

she's great.. now just give her an ice pick and some fake blood. american psycho 2-1/2

I'm not sure whether the thought of being charged with assault or of getting a rep as an "out of control" photographer motivates me more in that regard.

pervert

I am always amazed by how many people think that being a photographer is all about getting it on with the girls.

More amazing still is, judging from the horror stories I hear from the girls, how many photographers who have been doing this for years still try for "perks".

It's sad.

yeah....outdoor shit is good too.

I would turn her into Betty Boop :thumbsup

something about unseens work that makes the final product the perk.

I never said that at all... just saying that if I had chicks spreading their pussy lips a foot from my face all day long that is all "I" would be thinking about doing. Hence the phrase "How do you resist". (which was sort of a rhetorical question)

That's why I started http://www.modelspdx.com for models in the Portland area (for those not in the know about "PDX," it is Portland's airport code and commonly used as shorthand for "Portland" in local parlance). This model ran into two such photographers who were so plainly after tail in the interview that she never got around to working with them. And then there's the "point of view" guys, which wouldn't be so bad, except that they don't advertise for models to do it, but try to convert a stills shoot into a blow job. Not a good position to be putting an 18 year old girl into.

Satisfied?

http://www.girlsdotcom.com/Temp/Woodsy4.jpg

Two words:

Teen Witch :Graucho

That of course, being a compliment from Jamdin. I would have to agree, she has the look of the goddess about her. Yum. I need a new altar.....

Learning Photoshop?
:)

?

Anyway, I just realized I said I shot her "southwest of Salem." I means "southeast," but apparently no one cared enough to check their maps. Had I shot her southwest of Salem, we would have been in the Coastal Range, not the Cascades.

LOVE that Pacific NW landscape!

First pic, shadow of the hand and no shadows on the car.

Second pic, look at the right side of the ass and thigh

Third pic, left shoulder and shadows


And overall the contrast.

Nothing against you but the pics didn?t look right to me

JMO, :)

:)

Her hand is behind her body in the first pic. In the second pic, I still don't know what you are talking about. In the third, well, all I can say is it's not photoshopped (beyond working on the colors and some sharpening, which I did to all 3 pics). The photo was only 2 hours old when I put it up, and believe me, Photoshopping on THAT level is way beyond my skills.

I want some of what you're smoking!

I doubt it. Marlboro Lights!

Look at the the pics and tell me what you see from a webmaster or designer point of view?

Like I said JMO.
:)

anyway, she's a nice looking girl for sure.

Can this girl possibly get any hotter?

http://www.christinamodel.com/s176-043.jpg

Well there are some light issues but nothing you couldn't easily fix once you get the pics to a designer. Mind you Unseen is a photographer, I happen to think a good one and I like pretty much most of his work.

I like his work so there is no issue with that. My issue was that his pics looked like a Photshop shot rather than a real photo session.

:)

With that look on her face I would not dare, she'd probably kick you in the nuts.

I never get it on with a model ask Eva my 25 year old wife.
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

I guess it's down to the shooter.

I think the fill flash made them look artificial.

Okay, NOW let's talk Photoshop. (Just kidding!) :thumbsup

man that pussy so fat looks like the double quarter pounder at mcdonalds

LOL...You think you don't already have a bad rep? Hold on...I am going to pass this thread around to a few other local photographers and see if they have the balls to reply.

Tube tops make me giggle.

Jasmine told me you had a hard on the entire time you shot her.

Kinda freaked her out.

Luckly she was a freak but i found it kinda funny.

That's a long ride on a bicycle especially for such an old man.

I think I will aslo interject and say that along with Aaron I have heard many many stories of your "professionalism" or lack there of.

Try keeping your shirt on during shoots. Wear underwear so the wet spot on your crotch is not as noticable. Quit asking your models out for dinner and wine especially the minors. Have a little class when speaking with your models.

I can go on but why bother?

I highly doubt they are altered as suggested. The lighting conditions were not prime but this is amateur work we are talking about so it is perfectly acceptable.

Nothing against you but "fill flash" in day light setting?

:)

Yes. Quite common actually. Keep in mind that he is also shooting in shaded areas.

I was bouncing a hot light and using a fill flash in this shot which was taken on a bright day under a palm tree..

http://www.ampcontent.com/Pics/Sample1.jpg

So in the last photo shown, we have reside from lights being used during a day light shot?

I happen to like this guys work but not this stuff posted :)

He's working out doors with fill in camera flash and maybe reflectors. This is a nightmare to get right and will screw most professionals with 20 years experience a crew and a lot of expensive equipment.

The sun is banging out enough light to give an FStop of F11-13 at a 125 shutter speed. A camera falsh is best at F4.5 to F8 at 60. Most pro photographers will have a generator and use studio lights, to give the power/light required.

Also he is moving around to lots of different locations and getting varying light.

Tom photography wise, good pics in difficult circumstances. :thumbsup

Not sure that I follow your question. Unseen was using a fill flash to compensate for the shadows. The conditions of that last photo are pretty fucked up but I think it was shot fairly well considering what he had to work with. He is a decent shooter but is used to indoors. All things considered, the pics are fine for his average client.

AaronM


In the studio lights are great. I will stop posting about the photoshop pics.

Have a good day.:)

Agreed. One more thing...Since Unseen is shooting with a Nikon D100 now, he may want to check out some of the other metering modes. The Spot Meter can be very handy in these situations.

No Paul, he probably does not use a hand held meter. :glugglug

We are talking about fill flash in this case, not lights.

Enjoy your day. :thumbsup

For $300 he should. They are marvelous things for telling you what the light is doing.

Better than relying on some lap top and a scren outdoors or even worse the screen on the back of the D100, which is very god by the way.

Tom were you using a zoom or fixed lens?

not bad:thumbsup

1: It's amateur. We have had this discussion before.

2: If he wanted to be called Tom then he would have either registered as Tom or told people that he does not mind being called by his real name as you have done. Don't get me wrong, the guy is a self righteous hypocritical prick. His clients like his work though and that is really all that matters.

nice shots, cute girl

!

Thanks and talking about fill flash or lights why don't you talk about the errors in masking using Photoshop?


I will have a good day. Like I said, I like his work but look at the pics posted...can the camera really do a hack job without knowing?
:)