GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Read this? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=132616)

Paul Markham 05-09-2003 09:55 PM

Read this?
 
Some very interesting points.

http://www.theadultwebmaster.com/eve..._protect.phtml

The one I liked was that the industry could put up a pop up on the site telling people what they are doing to this industry. If we could motivate the millions that surf our site to vote against them then they would leave us alone.

eroswebmaster 05-09-2003 10:46 PM

Amazing, a post regarding one of the most important issues to hit the adult internet industry just gets ignored.

I for one want to do something about it.

Maybe some of these masters of design can design some nice flash banners that some of these traffic masters can put on their sites.

There's enough traffic in this industry, enough surfers, enough eyes that something could be done.

People may not go out and actively rally against some anti-porn bill hidden by a protect the children bill, but when they get behind that curtain to pull the lever they just may vote with their dicks.

Seriously...maybe some slogans like this:


Save porn on the net!

Protect your first amendment rights!

Save free speech on the net!

When you vote think with your dick and save porn!

p00p 05-09-2003 11:03 PM

I am all FOR it.... :321GFY

hybrid 05-09-2003 11:09 PM

Why not just avoid the whole ordeal altogether?

You know how they have .us, .biz, .net extensions?

Just have all adult sites from this point on be .prn extension or something.

This way, it's black and white.

.prn is porn, and everything else is everything else.

I wonder if whoever regulates this would be coordinated enough to switch over, or give rights to the .com domains to the ".prn" extensions....

Hmm.

Sly_RJ 05-09-2003 11:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by hybrid
Why not just avoid the whole ordeal altogether?

You know how they have .us, .biz, .net extensions?

Just have all adult sites from this point on be .prn extension or something.

This way, it's black and white.

.prn is porn, and everything else is everything else.

I wonder if whoever regulates this would be coordinated enough to switch over, or give rights to the .com domains to the ".prn" extensions....

Hmm.

Why?

hybrid 05-09-2003 11:12 PM

did you read the link?

It's all about misleading domains and such.

This way, you could have a misleading domain, all over the place, but as long as it's a ".prn" extension, everything would be gravy.

It would be established that .prn meant porn, so there could be NO confusion about it.

Sly_RJ 05-09-2003 11:15 PM

I don't need to read the link to know that I don't like the idea of designated adult extensions.

If we do that, we might as well start monitoring all domain extensions better. Did you know com extensions were meant for commercial sites? And net extensions were meant for networks? And of course, org were meant for organizations.

Let's crack down on all the foreign domain registration as well. Blokes should stop buying com extension domains, they have co.uk...

psyko514 05-09-2003 11:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by hybrid
did you read the link?

It's all about misleading domains and such.

This way, you could have a misleading domain, all over the place, but as long as it's a ".prn" extension, everything would be gravy.

It would be established that .prn meant porn, so there could be NO confusion about it.

why not .xxx instead of .prn?

hybrid 05-09-2003 11:19 PM

ok. I was just suggesting a solution to the problem, to avoid legal problems.

and .xxx is fine too, whatever would work.

Paul Markham 05-09-2003 11:53 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sly_RJ
I don't need to read the link to know that I don't like the idea of designated adult extensions.

If we do that, we might as well start monitoring all domain extensions better. Did you know com extensions were meant for commercial sites? And net extensions were meant for networks? And of course, org were meant for organizations.

Let's crack down on all the foreign domain registration as well. Blokes should stop buying com extension domains, they have co.uk...

Sly by doing this we immediately let the surfer know he's going to a porn site.

The interested guy will hit the link, the uninterested will not.

It will save on your bandwidth bill if nothing else. Or do you think you can persuade 1 in 100,000 of those misled into hitting on a porn site into signing up?

Another thing would be to make the search engines identify us as porn sites. Perhaps by sticking a logo next to us.

Let's do what shops do, in most civilised countries, lets have a sign that says in someway;

PORNO HERE!

So before they hit our sites, they know what they are going to.

This will take away from the US goverment one of it's biggest arguments. That we are invading innocent people's computers.

KRL 05-10-2003 12:01 AM

The problem with this industry is there are so many webmasters that will do anything and everything to beat the system. They'll try and steal traffic. Try and fuck sponsors. Fuck other webmasters by copying designs and marketing techniques. There are no traditional business morals in the porn biz.

I don't think we'll ever have a clean house. Too many scammers on the Net now and I don't see an effective way to stop them.

Paul Markham 05-10-2003 12:14 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by KRL
The problem with this industry is there are so many webmasters that will do anything and everything to beat the system. They'll try and steal traffic. Try and fuck sponsors. Fuck other webmasters by copying designs and marketing techniques. There are no traditional business morals in the porn biz.

I don't think we'll ever have a clean house. Too many scammers on the Net now and I don't see an effective way to stop them.

That is why we are such easy targets.

There is a way to clean it up.

We are legislated till it hurts or we do it ourselves.

Simply draw up rules about how we do business.
Then refuse to use hosts, sponsors, affiliates, TGP, AVS companies, etc. who do not play by the rules.
It will then hurt most in the pocket and they will conform.
I'm a member of APIC and have to abide by their rules to get them to protect my copyrights. I know you do not like them but it's the principal of having rules and sticking to them.

What it needs is someone with the organistion skills to run it, someone who can't make it as a porn webmaster but can make it as a "Union Organiser"

Think of the power it would have against the goverment and cock suckers like Acacia.

But KRL has a very good point. When you have big successful companies run by kids fresh out of college, they actually think this is the wild west where they can do as they like.

Paul Markham 05-10-2003 12:21 AM

Just saw this and again interesting.

http://xbiz.com/articles/index.php?article_idp=520

hybrid 05-10-2003 12:28 AM

You know, the "union organizer" thing is something I've thought about quite a bit. It's funny that you say that.

I have a few ideas, but the only problem is that the only time a large group of semi-influential people want to organize for anything it's to claim affiliation with a made-up GFY "family" that does'nt really do anything constructive for the industry.

You either have to threaten or influence to motivate people to collectively do anything. Unfortunately in this industry, everyone's so worried about the short term concerning their own pockets, that it's hard for them to see the forest for the trees.

I have to admit, I even feel the same way for the most part, I'm sure that if I followed my instinct and jumped on the bandwagon years earlier, I would be able to afford to horse around with something like this.

Now? I won't fuck with it if it won't benefit me financially.

I suppose this'll change as I accumulate more money.

eroswebmaster 05-10-2003 12:42 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by KRL
The problem with this industry is there are so many webmasters that will do anything and everything to beat the system. They'll try and steal traffic. Try and fuck sponsors. Fuck other webmasters by copying designs and marketing techniques. There are no traditional business morals in the porn biz.

I don't think we'll ever have a clean house. Too many scammers on the Net now and I don't see an effective way to stop them.

I think the point tho' KRL is who cares what the scammers are doing?

That's why laws like this are made. To go after the shit heels who are intentionally misleading people to their sites by picking such domains as (the most obvious) whitehouse.com, or by inserting keywords like Backstreet Boys into their text.
About 2 years ago my niece stumbled across some porn sites after doing a search for one of the guys in the Backstreet Boys. She used both his first name and last name, nothing but porn came up.

I want to be able to run my site knowing full well I'm in compliance with the law (and not some vague law) and have no need to fear prosecution for running a simple porn site.

I think an adult extension would help solve this problem. Would it clear up things 100%? No. Nothing will. But if it ensures I can continue to do business without fear of jail time then I'm all for it.

Edited to add: I'm all for fighting this bullshit law as well. However, it's going to be costly for someone that first group of wm's who get prosecuted. I'm sure careers, and businesses will be lost over a law that will surely get turned over in the supreme court.

4Pics 05-10-2003 12:48 AM

Adult extension would cause worse problems like being able to have ISP's that filter out porn altogether simply.

Then the husband has to argue we can't use earthlink cause they uh suck but we can use BlahNet...

Maybe you think they wouldn't block porn, but then again why would paypal drop porn? or you might say well look at all the bandwith places that host porn... Ms housewife 2000 doesn't know that but she sure as hell will know when she reads in the paper that porn sites have been moved to .xxx and that
certain providers block that automatically.

eroswebmaster 05-10-2003 12:53 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 4Pics
Adult extension would cause worse problems like being able to have ISP's that filter out porn altogether simply.

Then the husband has to argue we can't use earthlink cause they uh suck but we can use BlahNet...

Maybe you think they wouldn't block porn, but then again why would paypal drop porn? or you might say well look at all the bandwith places that host porn... Ms housewife 2000 doesn't know that but she sure as hell will know when she reads in the paper that porn sites have been moved to .xxx and that
certain providers block that automatically.


People will vote with their pocket book and go to the provider that allows access to adult extensions.

ISP's already have the option of limiting your choice of newsgroups. Every ISP I've had has anywhere from 30,000-80,000 newsgroups, and tons of porn.

hybrid 05-10-2003 12:54 AM

Quote:

Adult extension would cause worse problems like being able to have ISP's that filter out porn altogether simply.
This is

A) good for the economy
B) Safer from a legal standpoint for us.

How would it be a bad thing? We lose married men whose housewives monitor their internet experiences?

Am I wrong to think this is the same kind of customer that never buys because they're afraid wifey will find out about a certain CC purchase?

And let's not forget the parents who don't want their children to view porn.

Now we're legal AND we're not wasting bandwidth.

Hmm.

4Pics 05-10-2003 01:02 AM

I can't believe people would be for this, you think it's bad that Ibill now requires CVV2, this will cause 50-75% drop in revenue!

Carrie 05-10-2003 01:59 AM

RawAlex and I hashed out the .xxx extention debate about a month ago over on the Pond. Me for, him against.
He had some interesting points to think about:

Quote:

Alien, you don't think you make sales when some southern baptist hick goes out, drinks a little too much, comes home horny, and surfs porn? People don't want to admit they surf porn - make it too hard, and they won't surf porn.make it too easy for ISPs to block (and carriers to decline to carry) and it won't be long before your porn sites won't be accessible to huge parts of the marketplace.What would you do tomorrow if AOL decided not to carry .sex or .xxx domains? Or MSN? Or BOTH?What would you do if the individual states started to pass laws (like pennsylvania did) to block access to certain sites? Once porn is boxed into an easily defined area, it is VERY easy for these people to pass laws (that might not standup in court, but could take YEARS to get struck down) that would limit people's access to porn by obliging ISPs to block these sites, unblocking them for certain users "only on request, where proof of age can be shown, and only to households where no minors can access the material".Sorry, once you are marked as different, you can be treated different.Alex

RawAlex ::: link2x
Fri Apr 11 20:53:56 2003 - 67.68.201.130 - message #211552
_______________________________________________

More important question: What would you do if the state you are in makes it illegal to provide access to .sex and .xxx domains without written request, proof of ID, etc in EACH and every case? What if those domains are not available in any house with a minor? Not available without a government issues ID card?How many porn surfers are really going to jump through hoops to get their porn?Think of it like zoning strip clubs and adult bookstores out of business - in net terms, it is easy.Think about this: Take one of the major carriers, say "Worldcom", as an example - New York Company. State of New York passes a "cannot carry or distribute adult material that might be viewed by a minor" law. Perhaps does it by declaring that adult material passes through networks that pass within 500 feet of a school (or whatever the NYC rules are on adult business zoning). All of a sudden, your sites cannot be seen by anyone on their networks.Do this about 5 times, and suddenly adult material cannot be viewed by a large majority of people - there are not that many pipe providers anymore. When we are mixed in with the general population, we cannot be singled out. As soon as we are marked and seperated, it won't be long before states, counties, and cities in the US will attempt to use new found marking to their advantage. Anyone want to bet how long it will take Utah to ban porn sites in the .xxx and .sex range? I would guess SECONDS.Ways to do it:Make it illegal to have those domains in DNS serversBlock / refuse any outside network request for those domains (use reverse DNS lookups to stop IP accesses as well).Use polluted DNS to redirect porn surfers to government operated anti-porn sitesIt technically isn't hard once porn sites are easy to spot.Alex

RawAlex ::: All Porn Links
Sat Apr 12 01:03:04 2003 - 67.68.201.130 - message #211564
_______________________________________________

Carrie, it went through virtual unopposed because it is a tack on to the amber alert bill - and nobody wants to be on record as being against the amber alert thing. That is why these things get tacked on here, because they know they will get passed. If they were out there in the open by themselves, they would never see the light of day.US politics 101.As for "what's worse"... consider that Pennsylvania already as a law requiring ISPs to block certain sites, and it feels no reason to release that list to the public. There are already huge regulations as to where an adult business can be located. Very simply, any ISP offering .sex and .xxx access is considered an adult business. Most of them would fail the zoning restrictions, and there you go.More importantly, the upstream providers would fail the "adult business" test as well. They could be forced to move or discontinue offering "adult products"."zoning" is a very neat way to get around writing obscenity laws.Alex

RawAlex ::: findpics
Sat Apr 12 09:56:14 2003 - 67.68.202.130 - message #211569
_______________________________________________

Carrie, it could be argued that a bookstore with adult material isn't a producer... just providing access to the material. It doesn't stand up.Once the material can be segregated, someone will work to make it be blocked... it won't take long at all, I am sure...LB, I think that it might actually be acceptable as a law, but the wording is vague enough that it will be hard to prove. Sites like whitehouse.com and a few others are clearly attempting to profit from people not looking for porn, and as such, might get hit. Alex

RawAlex ::: findpics
Sat Apr 12 10:47:57 2003 - 67.68.202.130 - message #211572
_______________________________________________

Carrie, the ISP is directly profiting by selling access - this would be DOUBLY true if there starts to be "adult ISPs" and "regular ISPs"...Even if it won't stick, it still will make some close, block, or go out of business... and that would suck.Alex

RawAlex ::: findpics
Sat Apr 12 11:16:33 2003 - 67.68.202.130 - message #211575
_______________________________________________

Carrie, article for ya (note that terra.es was blocked... )http://news.com.com/2100-1023-959045.html

RawAlex ::: all porn links
Sat Apr 12 11:17:56 2003 - 67.68.202.130 - message #211576
I know that's a lot to read but you need context to make his case, and copy/paste doesn't preserve formatting.
If you want to look up the discussion with everyone's replies, he starts his side of the issue at message #211548 on the Pond's main board.

hybrid 05-10-2003 02:06 AM

Damn, and there I thought I had come up with a legitimate original idea for once that would revolutionize the industry as we know it.

Oh well, back to work.

Paul Markham 05-10-2003 07:48 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by hybrid
Damn, and there I thought I had come up with a legitimate original idea for once that would revolutionize the industry as we know it.

Oh well, back to work.

Yes it sounded like a good idea at first. That is why boards are so important.

Pity I did not stick a picture of some lame ass bird with a banana in her pussy, then the thread might stay at the top.

Sed reflection on our industry, this board or both?

We are seriously under fire and what is more imprtant to the guys that make there living in this business?

Va2k 05-10-2003 08:00 AM

What Could I do to help? I like the idea about making banners I can make a dozen banners or so, if somone would be willing to make up the webpages with the best spelling,grammer to let everyone know what we are up against! *shrugs* This is scary shit, and something not to play around with, I for one dont want to goto jail and meet bubba, If I liked it in the pooper I would be screwing men and taken pic's of it! FUCK THAT.

TOM

Brujah 05-10-2003 08:19 AM

There are large TGP site owners with millions of hits a day. What are they going to do ? I'll wait and see.

Brujah 05-10-2003 08:20 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by eroswebmaster
Amazing, a post regarding one of the most important issues to hit the adult internet industry just gets ignored.

Simple.

It's a post by charly with no indication what it's about other than 'Read This ?'

eroswebmaster 05-10-2003 09:12 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Brujah


Simple.

It's a post by charly with no indication what it's about other than 'Read This ?'

This thread has had plenty of page views which indicates enough people have read this thread but choose not to respond.

Even if only 1/3 of that is "unique" we've still had only about 10 wm's respond with their ideas or thoughts on this issue.

eroswebmaster 05-10-2003 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by charly
Yes it sounded like a good idea at first. That is why boards are so important.

Pity I did not stick a picture of some lame ass bird with a banana in her pussy, then the thread might stay at the top.

Sed reflection on our industry, this board or both?

We are seriously under fire and what is more imprtant to the guys that make there living in this business?

I think the problem is that not enough people understand the seriousness of this issues or how it WILL impact their business.

The government is looking for a chink in our armor. They have hit pornographers head on, but have lost important cases due to 1st amendment issues.

So they'll keep prodding, and poking until they find that weak spot, that may not cause instantaneous death, but will mortally wound us. The problem is we won't be hemoragging blood, but money. And even after all the talk about cars, houses on this board, I wonder how many rounds most of these guys on this board could go.


Also Paul I think as you stated earlier that there are a lot of young people in this industry who have made some good money and feel like they are living in the wild wild west.

I also think there are a lot of people in this industry who only see it as a temporary offshoot on their path to mainstream.

This is something to pay for the partying they do in college while they get a degree so they can find a "real" job.

So if porn disappears tomorrow, for some it's no big deal.

But for those of us who have made it their career choice, that's a whole other ball game.

Paul Markham 05-10-2003 09:28 AM

eroswebmaster
Yes I agree about the students, but these will be the first to go and the last to care. As you said it's us with families and commitments that have to get organised.

Brujah
And the other posts says "Dumb tart with a banan in her pussy?" Just because you do not like the way I post, or even the way I express myself, what about the message?

Brujah 05-10-2003 09:50 AM

Charly it wasn't so much about the contents of your post, as to the title with a link to read information elsewhere about something.

Something like:

Read this ?

This site has a good article. You should read it.
(insert link to some site here)



First instinct was to wait and just come back to it later when someone else actually clicked over, did some reading and commented on it. Then I'd know what it was about and why I might want to read it.

Brujah 05-10-2003 09:52 AM

About the actual message now...

Interesting idea. Let's see if the TGP owners who give away all the free porn will add anything or not.

eroswebmaster 05-10-2003 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Brujah
About the actual message now...

Interesting idea. Let's see if the TGP owners who give away all the free porn will add anything or not.

I don't think it should be left up to just the tgp owners, this affects everyone in this business even paysites.

Brujah 05-10-2003 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by eroswebmaster


I don't think it should be left up to just the tgp owners, this affects everyone in this business even paysites.

Not just them. But lets see if any of them take the lead or set an example that they believe something like this should be done. Or lets see if any of the larger site owners will do the same.

Or is it yet another of the hundreds of henny penny articles popping up because it's dramatic and people will talk about so your resource site traffic will grow ? You know, the kind that newbies love to icq and email about while the larger players don't think it's worth bothering with.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:52 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123