Question about the morality of shortening the suffering.

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • Cyber Fucker
    Hmm
    • Sep 2005
    • 12642
    #1

    Question about the morality of shortening the suffering.

    Or perhaps more suitable title should be what is wrong and what is right, to do in a such situation..
    If you stumbled upon an animal in agony, and you had no means/knowledge how to help it, would it be an option to kill it, in order to shorten its suffering?
    I saw a bird yesterday night that was looking like dying in pain. I had no idea what was wrong with it, and how I could help it, and I was wondering if I should kill it or leave it be... Do I have the right to make such decision? Should I? It's not like we can ask it what it wants...
    Tags: None
    • CaptainHowdy
      Too lazy to set a custom title
      • Dec 2004
      • 94037
      #2
      You're talking about putting GFY out of its misery ??

        Comment

        • SilentKnight
          Megan Fox's fluffer
          • Oct 2005
          • 24812
          #3
          Make an executive decision like a boss.

          Years ago a seagull flew into the grill of my truck. I stopped, went back to check it out...and saw that it was hopelessly fucked up - flopping around on the shoulder of the road obviously mortally wounded.

          I backed over it with the truck. It was the only humane thing to do. I felt bad, sure...but it wasn't something I'd caused or did intentionally. Just random fate.

            Comment

            Previous template Next
            Working...