Pelosi says her constituents are "not smart enough to understand impeachment"
 

Finally something we can agree on. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

"The Speaker, according to two sources with knowledge of the meeting, expressed concerns that the public still doesn’t understand how the process of impeachment would play out. She noted that in her time over the recess in California well educated voters didn’t seem to understand that impeachment proceedings would not necessarily result in Trump’s immediate ouster from office."

https://truepundit.com/pelosi-public...d-impeachment/

The title of the document reads like a quote, even though Mme Speaker did not actually use those words.

Because? TruePundit.com. Lol @ idiots who quote it. Suggestion: Go back to that website and click those amazing ads you see there. They are directly targeting you.

Ah, so you were in the meeting?

If you haven't noticed there genius TruePundit does A LOT of news aggregation. Hence the "Read more" link to the actual source. I'm sure you'll LOVE it even more

If the average voter had much of an understanding of anything Congress wouldn't constantly have an approval rating of below 20% and a reelection rate of 95%.

You should learn to read.

The Title of the article is: "Pelosi: Public Not Smart Enough to Understand Impeachment". Sounds like a quote, but it's not.

The actual quote, which is in the same article that you linked to, says this: "The Speaker, according to two sources with knowledge of the meeting, expressed concerns that the public still doesn’t understand how the process of impeachment would play out. She noted that in her time over the recess in California well educated voters didn’t seem to understand that impeachment proceedings would not necessarily result in Trump’s immediate ouster from office."

Get it now? Pelosi never said what you said she said in the title of your post. Pelose also never said what the title of the article is. Someone else read it for you, and dumbed it down in the title. You then read the dumbed-down title, and dumbed it down for GFY.

You being the idiot that you are, misquoted a misquote. Pure pablum was served up to a moron who didn't or couldn't read the actual article, which TruePundit was kind enough to present to you.

Please go back to https://truepundit.com/pelosi-public...d-impeachment/ and click on every advertisement and spend money. You are their target consumer. It would be bad for you to prove them wrong, and me right.

She was back home in California.. Talking to her "well educated" constituents.. Who the fuck else would be talking to her? Also note how she said "they don't understand it would not mean immediate removal" Who else is that stupid MARK? Who would want immediate removal? The public as a whole or her "too stupid" constituents"

sigh.

https://media.istockphoto.com/vector...bfOAXaboS23f0=

Pelosi is making every excuse in the book because she's nothing more than a Reagan era Republican..

She is more worried about progressives kicking the 1980s Republicans out of the Democrat party..

I didnt like 1980s Republicans then and I dont like them in the Democrat party.

It's time this country gets pulled back away from the right wing..

PLEASE DO.. Move to her district and start NOW.. I'll donate for some bug out van gas.

If Pelosi had R next to her name you'd be cheering for her... Same with Obama..

Obama was consistently to the right of Reagan yet you retards called him a liberal.. You really have no clue about anything..

And?

And?

Huh?

Are you on drugs?

It's not her that made the mistake dipshit, its you LOL! Read the full article (and the link to Britbart) , and then re-read the title of that article, and then re-read yours. You dun goofed, son!


You, Me, Pizza, Beer, Good times.


I am not sure about that. I don't understand why she is resisting impeachment. I get that she thinks it could backfire, but after that I don't get it.


Please do... what? What are you asking Crockett to do here? What did he say he was going to do? Are you getting your threads mixed up? I think maybe you need to go to Mass Mental and commit yourself.

I've said it so many times already, but here we go again: onwebcam needs help. Something has gone loose in his head.

Its not hate or trying to bring him down. I generally want him to seek help before its too late.

Dear Clueless, I'm not a Republican and I voted for Obama in '08.. (but shortly thereafter figured out he was a FRAUD.)

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

I'm crazy and Pelosi is the definition of sanity

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

You fuckers voted for Trudeau. You have no say in this matter.

Well, it sure seems like it.

As I said earlier, you misquoted a misquote, and did not read the actual and short text, that you yourself linked to.

You're taking this the wrong way. Don't worry about it - a lot of people make that mistake. People read the headlines, then share and comment on it without reading the body and understanding it. I used to do this too.

Just own up to the fact that you dun goofed. I have in the past and if I can do it, so can you.

Peace.

And trump said he loves the uneducated like you

Its ok to admit when you're wrong. It is what enables you to grow as a person.

Holy shit Mark, every fucking response you make reads "I have ZERO reading comprehension skills" It's like teaching a retard reading comprehension

Here's your "too stupid to understand" lesson for today.. Crockett called her a Regan era Republican and then said the progressives want to kick the Regan era Republicans out of the Dem party..

Fred you clueless clown. Hefner was publishing pics of naked 12 year olds. Fuck you and your false accusations. :321GFY

Yes he did Onwebcam, but I'm not talking about what he said, am I? And why do you feel the need to try to change the subject instead of admit you were wrong?

You started this thread, and I pointed out the error you made in the title. In fact, your title does not even agree with the quote that you posted in your original post.

Why is it so hard for you to admit you made a mistake? I promise I won't laugh at you, but just suck it up already. You'll feel better I promise.

Where does this come from? I never heard this.

Could you be confusing it with this? Is this Playboy model keeping the biggest secret of the Trump presidency? | Will Bunch

I'm not changing the subject. The subject is you're too stupid to understand. You can't even comprehend a couple of fucking sentences.. It's pretty fucking obvious you can't comprehend that news organizations aren't going to give it to you straight...

Again, she said she was BACK HOME in CA. Where she was talking to HER "well educated voters" who are TOO STUPID TO UNDERSTAND

Those new outlets were being nice Mark.. They weren't going to tell YOU you're too stupid to understand like I will. So they generalized and tossed the whole of the population in there to be nice to you retards

But LOL you did!

I pointed out your goof in Post #2. You then asked if I was in the meeting (?!?), talked about Aggregation, pointed out a read more link to the actual source. I don't think you even understood what I was telling you. You did it again in post 6 and again 16 ("You voted for Trudeau"). Get it now?


But d00d, I do, and I pointed out YOUR mistake.

Except that that's not the point, and its not what I said. Let's try it again. Nancy Pelosi never said, what you said she said. You *lied* to everyone on GFY, or you Misquoted. Get it?


She called no one stupid, and did not at any time say her constituents are "not smart enough to understand impeachment" as the title of this post says. Again, the full, actual quote is "The Speaker, according to two sources with knowledge of the meeting, expressed concerns that the public still doesn’t understand how the process of impeachment would play out. She noted that in her time over the recess in California well educated voters didn’t seem to understand that impeachment proceedings would not necessarily result in Trump’s immediate ouster from office."

In other words, the editor or whoever wrote this story, cherry-picked a few words, presented out of context and changed it slightly just because they knew some slow-mo's would carry it forward and continue false ideas and perceptions about Pelosi.

No, they weren't. They misquoted what she said, and presented it big letters AND out of contested. You read those big letters and repeated it. How are they being nice? And who are they being nice too? You? Think about it. They took an event, and changed it slightly so that people with strong confirmation bias like you, will take the bait.

(Confirmation Bias: The often unconscious act of referencing only those perspectives that fuel our pre-existing views, while at the same time ignoring or dismissing opinions — no matter how valid — that threaten our world view). Tell me this isn't you.

Well now you're not even trying... too bad for you.

You pointed out that you're TOO STUPID to understand that not understanding is being TOO STUPID


stu·pid
/ˈst(y)o͞opəd/
Learn to pronounce
adjective
1.
having or showing a great lack of intelligence or common sense.

2. See 2MuchMark

Lol you're the one who (a) can't understand common sense, (b) won't admit to their mistake, and (c) won't correct it. Weakling.

No, he was referring to your dangerously obsessive behaviour with this topic. You don't even realize that pretty much nobody here is a pelosi fan. Most people on the left don't want her as a speaker and she gets in the way of anything progressive--which is exactly the thing you ate too... You didn't even have to drudge up a fake article like you did. You can get an actual one from a real news site and find stuff that people don't like about her, the real stuff i mean.

Our politics is completely irrelevant because no matter who gets elected here, none of the options were a megalomaniac tv star who gas lights closet racists for the sake of votes.

The real stuff? Like CNN? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh