gun nuts inside
 

Arizona's people dont fuk around, can conceal carry at 21 without a permit..Wow!

Finally...a god gun story.

Why would god need a gun?

several states now have no permit concealed carry Its in the house in GA and It likely wont pass this time but eventually it will...I have a GA carry Permit but it would be nice Not to have to spend the money every 5 years for what is a Constitutional Right

no shit...wow for sure... if its true

the flood didn't work? :helpme

Good for him that's awesome :thumbsup

I'm 100% for conceal & carry for any citizen over 18 as long as all carriers have a full background check, take a comprehensive gun course and have a gun permit proving they took the gun course. Very easy.

If we had more educated gun owners carrying in public I think we'd have less crime & conflict.

I agree 100% my only thought is that it shouldn't cost the citizen a dime and there should be no license associated with it

I conceal & carry every day. Feels nice, cause I'm born and raised in the police state of NYC where that constitutional right doesn't exist. I'm absolutely in favor of the license and price. Need a license to drive, why not for carrying a fucking gun?

but not to vote, right? :thumbsup

That would be racist! :mad:

I don't know about him but I think having a valid or expired ID to vote is a great idea.

The reason I say expired is because I don't think your rkght to vote should be violated because your ID expired the month before or something.

You're always trying to peg non Trumpers as far left loons it's funny :1orglaugh

This was a story of home defense, exactly what guns should be used for.. The problem with guns arise when people take them out of their homes..

On the surface this sounds like a great story.... But there is something else.

The man was woken up by the sounds of intruders breaking into this house. He warned the people that he was there... This wasn't a standard break in...

Wrong.

I know the black guy in my avatar triggers you, but I am 100% against non-citizens voting.

A good deed indeed to take the perps out of their misery..:thumbsup

There is no constitutional guarantee of your right to drive, thats why driving is a privilege guns are a right...big diffeence

^i look at the license part of things as the "well regulated" part of the Constitution.

How else would you regulate the "malitia"?

Considering that when it was written there were no licenses for anything I wouldnt say that licensing has anything to do with a "well regulated militia" and considering the Bill of rights is a list of things that government can NOT do I doubt that this is any exception.

According to your logic our right to bare arms only gurantees us the use of single shot muskets because those are the only guns that existed back then.

No constitutional right to an AR15, semi automatic guns, any gun with 6 chambers, etc.

You going to answer the question tho?

Got a better idea to well regulating the militia? Or...

So what do you assume the "well regulated" part means?

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

if i remember correctly the dems in the south thought the world would end if a brother needed an ID to vote :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

You are stuck in simpleton tropes

maybe..... self defense courses and combat training wont hurt, and everybody except black people will need a carry license.. just ask escorpio if you don't believe me :thumbsup

he flashed his house lights if I remember correctly, more about basic darwinism that gun stuff

I know the grapesoda in my avi triggers you (according to bronco guy) and I agree, no 'buts'

is concealed carry an right? don't think so, ownership is a right, after that its murky and open to interpretation.

if you are a member of a malita you are part of a military unit that is part of another military unit etc... it's not like being a boy scout or getting a medical weed card

now take your great analogy and apply it to 'workers rights' or 'women's right' not to EVEN mention the brothers :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

fairly obvious, ' be part of the existing military command' wouldn't you think?

So then the right to bear arms is only granted for those in service or in a well regulated militia?

"mi·li·tia

noun

a military force that is raised from the civil population to supplement a regular army in an emergency."

+

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

=

Licensed carriers fits the bill for me.

Me personally, I would like people to be licensed to buy and keep it in the house, severe punishments for straw buyers, severe punishments for illegal possession and federal checks for all private sales too.

But you know...

Just give every adult citizen a front loading musket as the founders intended.:thumbsup

you tell me :winkwink:

mental checks as well

yep and get women in the kitchen and bedroom like the founders intended :2 cents:

The Constitution doesn't have an amendment for that you dirty big dick pervert :1orglaugh

I realize that this article is above most people's level of reading comprehension, but what the 2nd Amendment means has already been researched and settled.

Please read it and educate yourselves, especially those of you that have tried to make it seem like you already know what it means.

https://www.uclalawreview.org/why-th...onary-america/

Not neccessary in both, just do not let them in the military.. God, how would have D Day or Iwojima looked like if chicks were storming the beachs, never mind the hermafrodites :2 cents:

I will, you read this https://www.amazon.com/Migrations-Cu...ag=googhydr-20