GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Ocasio-Cortez goes on tear defending role in Amazon’s New York exit (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1309515)

OneHungLo 02-20-2019 09:21 AM

Ocasio-Cortez goes on tear defending role in Amazon’s New York exit
 



Ocasio-Cortez just cost the state of New York


- 25,000 NEW EMPLOYEES

- @$150,000 AVERAGE SALARY

- $27.5 BILLION IN TAX REVENUES


Quote:

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez vigorously defended her role in sinking Amazon’s move to New York City on Tuesday in the face of bipartisan criticism, claiming the deal would have been “one of the biggest giveaways in state history” and would have priced people out of the local community.

“Frankly, the knee-jerk reaction assuming that I ‘don’t understand’ how tax giveaways to corps work is disappointing,” she tweeted. “No, it’s not possible that I could come to a different conclusion. The debate *must* be over my intelligence & understanding, instead of the merits of the deal.”

The freshman Democratic New York congresswoman has faced days of criticism from normally friendly media voices and fellow Democrats over her role in Amazon's decision to pull back from building a $2.5 billion campus in the Long Island City neighborhood of Queens.

Amazon had cited the opposition of “a number of state and local politicians” in its decision to abandon the plans. Ocasio-Cortez and others at the local level had pointed to incentives such as a $2.5 billion in tax breaks as a reason for their opposition.

“If we were willing to give away $3 billion for this deal, we could invest those $3 billion in our district ourselves, if we wanted to. We could hire out more teachers. We can fix our subways. We can put a lot of people to work for that money, if we wanted to,” Ocasio-Cortez said last week.

Mayor Bill de Blasio pushed back on that claim on Sunday. Even as he slammed Amazon for its decision, the mayor said critics wrongly suggested that tax breaks represented money that could be spent on other things. He said it wasn’t “money you had over here. And it was going over there.”

The Democratic mayor said: “That $3 billion that would go back in tax incentives was only after we were getting the jobs and getting the revenue.”


ellow Democratic Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y., accused those who are against the deal, including Ocasio-Cortez, of being opposed to jobs.

"It used to be that we would protest wars. Now we are protesting jobs?” she said on CNN Friday, before criticizing the economic arguments of those opposed to the Amazon move.


"I'm a progressive too, but I'm pragmatic,” she said. “We are $4 billion less than we usually get and yet we are kicking out a company that would have been projected [to pay] over 10 years roughly $27 billion in taxes.”

New York Times columnist Andrew Ross Sorkin ripped into critics of the deal, saying it was evidence of a “financial literacy epidemic” in America.

“Quick lesson: NYC wasn’t handing cash to Amazon. It was an incentive program based on job creation, producing tax revenue,” he tweeted. “There isn’t a $3 billion pile of money that can now be spent on subways or education.”

But on Tuesday, Ocasio-Cortez mocked critics, saying “there’s NO WAY that this deal - one of the biggest giveaways in state history - could possibly have been bad, right?

“Surely there can’t be anything wrong with suddenly announcing a massive restructuring & pricing out of a community without any advance notice or input from them,” she asked.

In her list of criticisms, she included claims that Amazon was selling facial recognition tech to immigration officials, and that real-estate insiders were creating rent spikes.

“Folks handling the failed deal treated community w/condescension+disdain for their legitimate concerns,” she argued. “I warned early to any & all that surging NYC costs+failing subways are creating major political forces to be reckoned with.”

“But I don’t know what I’m talking about, right?” she quipped, with a shrugging emoji.


https://www.foxnews.com/politics/oca...le-amazon-deal

King Mark 02-20-2019 09:26 AM

FYI, NY'ers don't care.

Bunch of people not from there trying to have fake outrage for redneck/hat points.

OneHungLo 02-20-2019 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dead Eye (Post 22419409)
FYI, NY'ers don't care.

Bunch of people not from there trying to have fake outrage for redneck/hat points.

27 billion is a lot in tax revenue. What a colossal blunder. I'm sure 25,000 jobs @ 150k a year would have helped.

Rochard 02-20-2019 09:29 AM

I am perfectly fine with what happened.

In all honesty, Amazon was about to bend NYC over and fuck it from behind. It went to NYC and said "We aren't going to pay ANY taxes" and expect the city to shell out tens of millions of dollars. No. Unemployment in NYC is 4.3%, right in line with everyone else.... They don't need the jobs. Amazon can go fuck itself.

I love Amazon. I have Amazon dots in every room, and buy from them a few times a month. However, they pull in billions of profits and don't pay ANY taxes. Fuck that.

pimpmaster9000 02-20-2019 09:31 AM

the right wing is too stupid to see the real problem: 99.9999% of all business owners pay their taxes...except bezos...right wingers will pretend that no other jobs will ever be available...

great idea: why not give everybody a tax break? oh right...somebody has to pay taxes...

not bezos tho :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

beerptrol 02-20-2019 09:32 AM

Trump has done more damage, but go on with your agenda and defend your corporate masters!

King Mark 02-20-2019 09:35 AM

Those jobs would have went to commuters from Jersey and upstate while the nyc residents got priced out for continued gentrification.

Fuck all that.

OneHungLo 02-20-2019 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dead Eye (Post 22419417)
Those jobs would have went to commuters from Jersey and upstate while the nyc residents got priced out for continued gentrification.

Fuck all that.

Oh I guess cleaning out the ghetto trash and making the place more safe and desirable is a bad thing? lol

Sorry you're not entitled to live anywhere when you're not paying for it. If you want to choose where you live, get off the government dole.

King Mark 02-20-2019 09:44 AM

Ghetto trash? Queens is safe af, clean and damn near suburban compared to the rest of nyc.

This ain't the 80s no more lol.

Them residents need good paying jobs, not corporations driving up their living expenses while the jobs go to non-residents.

OneHungLo 02-20-2019 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 22419413)
I am perfectly fine with what happened.

In all honesty, Amazon was about to bend NYC over and fuck it from behind. It went to NYC and said "We aren't going to pay ANY taxes" and expect the city to shell out tens of millions of dollars. No. Unemployment in NYC is 4.3%, right in line with everyone else.... They don't need the jobs. Amazon can go fuck itself.

I love Amazon. I have Amazon dots in every room, and buy from them a few times a month. However, they pull in billions of profits and don't pay ANY taxes. Fuck that.

Oh i'm are you are, rochard. Imagine if trump did this you would have a coronary.


And they would have paid over 27 billion in taxes you moron.

directfiesta 02-20-2019 10:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OneHungLo (Post 22419412)
27 billion is a lot in tax revenue. What a colossal blunder. I'm sure 25,000 jobs @ 150k a year would have helped.

sure , 150K per job ..... drink the FOX Kool-Aid ....

OneHungLo 02-20-2019 10:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta (Post 22419446)
sure , 150K per job ..... drink the FOX Kool-Aid ....

That's right from that baby killer (D) Cuomo.

Sly 02-20-2019 10:16 AM

One thing I'm curious about…

I read somewhere that she had a $4000 savings account and people were ripping on her about it. I think that's fantastic. Most people don't have any savings account at all. It's nice to see that she does.

But what I'm curious about is, how does that play into the vision of a socialist? That $4000 is more than most will ever have. What is the acceptable limit of somebody saving money and being able to say that they shouldn't have to spread the wealth with others?

directfiesta 02-20-2019 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OneHungLo (Post 22419448)
That's right from that baby killer (D) Cuomo.

Thx for the link :thumbsup:thumbsup

pimpmaster9000 02-20-2019 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly (Post 22419449)

But what I'm curious about is, how does that play into the vision of a socialist? That $4000 is more than most will ever have. What is the acceptable limit of somebody saving money and being able to say that they shouldn't have to spread the wealth with others?

this is not what socialism or communism is about...both systems naturally want their citizens to earn lots of money...but both in theory want as much equality as possible therefore the means of production are owned by everybody...

you would be surprised at how normal communism was for example in yugoslavia...it worked until the west started to meddle...people had considerable savings accounts because the state gave away houses and apartments and most of the population had 0 debt...

Sly 02-20-2019 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio (Post 22419485)
this is not what socialism or communism is about...both systems naturally want their citizens to earn lots of money...but both in theory want as much equality as possible therefore the means of production are owned by everybody...

This is what I have a problem with, or maybe don't understand.

The fact that she was able to save $4000 means that she was able to lower her expenses to an amount, by sacrificing, and able to save that additional money whereas other people were not able to. This could then mean that next time she should be paid less money because the $4000 is proof that she didn't truly need it all.

The government does this with budgets all the time. They will give a department a budget of let's say $1 million. If that department finds a way to have expenses of only $900,000, that leaves $100,000 left over. The next budget cycle, that department will only get $900,000 because they proved in the previous cycle that's all they really needed. This leads to departments burning through every penny they are given because they don't want to lose their budget the next time. Creating extreme waste and nonchalant attitudes towards money when they should be rewarded for saving money instead of punished.

But what you are saying is, "I will give you both the same exact job, with the same exact opportunities and what you do with those opportunities is on you." Is that right?

Rochard 02-20-2019 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly (Post 22419449)
One thing I'm curious about…

I read somewhere that she had a $4000 savings account and people were ripping on her about it. I think that's fantastic. Most people don't have any savings account at all. It's nice to see that she does.

But what I'm curious about is, how does that play into the vision of a socialist? That $4000 is more than most will ever have. What is the acceptable limit of somebody saving money and being able to say that they shouldn't have to spread the wealth with others?

We have the impression that everyone in Congress is rich. That is not always the case.

One time CNN did an interview with Rep. Jason Chaffetz, discussing how he sleeps in his office. According to the video, he makes $174k a year.... That's a lot of money to maintain a house at home and also an apartment in Washington DC.

It's really an interesting video...



Not everyone in Congress is rich. And I think we need more of this. Someone like Donald Trump who obviously hasn't been in a grocery store in forty years and someone like Hillary Clinton who hasn't driven a car in forty years shouldn't be making our laws. We need average every day ordinary Americans who understands the impact of the laws they pass.

Bladewire 02-20-2019 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly (Post 22419449)
One thing I'm curious about…

I read somewhere that she had a $4000 savings account and people were ripping on her about it. I think that's fantastic. Most people don't have any savings account at all. It's nice to see that she does.

But what I'm curious about is, how does that play into the vision of a socialist? That $4000 is more than most will ever have. What is the acceptable limit of somebody saving money and being able to say that they shouldn't have to spread the wealth with others?

Saving money & personal wealth are fine with Democratic socialists.

I'm not a socialist. I'm a blue dog Democrat.

I'm going to point out what is socialist in our current society in America.

GoFundMe - socialist

Pooling money to build a wall - socialist

Public schools - socialist

Military - socialist

Medicaid - socialist

Social security - socialist

Socialists believe the government should provide basic needs & services like healthcare, education, etc. to citizens.

Democratic socialists don't believe in authoritative governments controlling your every move they believe in voting & the power of the people. They also believe in taking the dark money & corporate bribes/lobbying out of government.

https://www.businessinsider.com/diff...cialist-2018-6

pimpmaster9000 02-20-2019 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly (Post 22419491)
This is what I have a problem with, or maybe don't understand.

The fact that she was able to save $4000 means that she was able to lower her expenses to an amount, by sacrificing, and able to save that additional money whereas other people were not able to. This could then mean that next time she should be paid less money because the $4000 is proof that she didn't truly need it all.

The government does this with budgets all the time. They will give a department a budget of let's say $1 million. If that department finds a way to have expenses of only $900,000, that leaves $100,000 left over. The next budget cycle, that department will only get $900,000 because they proved in the previous cycle that's all they really needed. This leads to departments burning through every penny they are given because they don't want to lose their budget the next time. Creating extreme waste and nonchalant attitudes towards money when they should be rewarded for saving money instead of punished.

But what you are saying is, "I will give you both the same exact job, with the same exact opportunities and what you do with those opportunities is on you." Is that right?

this is not how it worked at all...people in communist countries had savings because they had 0 debt...nobody told them they have too much and nobody told them what to do with the money...what you are saying does not exist...my grandmother left her life savings to my mom it was a considerable amount of money and it was accumulated and stored in a commie bank for like 50 years...it is unimaginable that some state official would come and take her money...I come from a banking family and I can tell you that there was no legal mechanism for the state to do this until recently even for unpaid taxes...10 years ago there was SHIT the state could do to take your money...

I have only had my money seized by americans...first egold and 1mdc then liberty reserve...I would never ever ever under any circumstances bank in the USA...not because of americans but because of the US gov and how happy they are to seize shit...

OneHungLo 02-20-2019 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio (Post 22419485)
this is not what socialism or communism is about...both systems naturally want their citizens to earn lots of money...but both in theory want as much equality as possible therefore the means of production are owned by everybody...

you would be surprised at how normal communism was for example in yugoslavia...it worked until the west started to meddle...people had considerable savings accounts because the state gave away houses and apartments and most of the population had 0 debt...

Oh everything was hunky-dory in communism land. There's always an excuse why it always fails :1orglaugh

OneHungLo 02-20-2019 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 22419498)
Saving money & personal wealth are fine with Democratic socialists.

I'm not a socialist. I'm a blue dog Democrat.

I'm going to point out what is socialist in our current society in America.

GoFundMe - socialist

Pooling money to build a wall - socialist

Public schools - socialist

Military - socialist

Medicaid - socialist

Social security - socialist

And we have all these services directly because of CAPITALISM and free markets.

Acepimp 02-20-2019 03:12 PM

This is the only thing that I agree with AOC on. Amazon should help other cities that really need it.


TheSquealer 02-20-2019 04:11 PM

https://i.redd.it/tpo6wlmdprh21.png

Major (Tom) 02-20-2019 09:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dead Eye (Post 22419409)
FYI, NY'ers don't care.

Bunch of people not from there trying to have fake outrage for redneck/hat points.

They care

Bladewire 02-20-2019 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 22419498)
Saving money & personal wealth are fine with Democratic socialists.

I'm not a socialist. I'm a blue dog Democrat.

I'm going to point out what is socialist in our current society in America.

GoFundMe - socialist

Pooling money to build a wall - socialist

Public schools - socialist

Military - socialist

Medicaid - socialist

Social security - socialist

Socialists believe the government should provide basic needs & services like healthcare, education, etc. to citizens.

Democratic socialists don't believe in authoritative governments controlling your every move they believe in voting & the power of the people. They also believe in taking the dark money & corporate bribes/lobbying out of government.

https://www.businessinsider.com/diff...cialist-2018-6

Quote:

Originally Posted by OneHungLo (Post 22419562)
And we have all these services directly because of CAPITALISM and free markets.

Why are you lying?

You still can't have an honest conversation. You're back on ignore.

Definition of socialism. 1 : any of various economic and/or political devices advocating collective or governmental ownership and/or administration of the means of production and distribution of goods and/or services.

GAMEFINEST 02-20-2019 10:15 PM

She has some nice knockers..

Mr Pheer 02-20-2019 10:17 PM

Lets see how you guys feel about her when the newest bunch of shit comes out. You'll see her version of socialism, at least concerning her boyfriend.

Should be hitting the news just about now...

pimpmaster9000 02-21-2019 01:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OneHungLo (Post 22419560)
Oh everything was hunky-dory in communism land. There's always an excuse why it always fails :1orglaugh

It worked fine...we did not have nukes or bacteria to keep invaders out...big mistake...

directfiesta 02-21-2019 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 22419585)

The Job Creators Network (JCN) is an advocacy group founded by Home Depot co-founder and former CEO Bernie Marcus.[1] It describes its agenda as to promote small businesses and has been described as leaning conservative.[2]


BTW, nice avatar ....

Your usage confirms what most people saw ... a liitle smart ass racist punk :2 cents:

OneHungLo 02-21-2019 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio (Post 22419787)
It worked fine...we did not have nukes or bacteria to keep invaders out...big mistake...

haha no it didn't. It failed miserably and you know it.

Bladewire 02-21-2019 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta (Post 22419950)
The Job Creators Network (JCN) is an advocacy group founded by Home Depot co-founder and former CEO Bernie Marcus.[1] It describes its agenda as to promote small businesses and has been described as leaning conservative.[2]


BTW, nice avatar ....

Your usage confirms what most people saw ... a liitle smart ass racist punk :2 cents:

It's very well established here that he's a dumbass not a smartass :2 cents:

OneHungLo 02-21-2019 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta (Post 22419950)
The Job Creators Network (JCN) is an advocacy group founded by Home Depot co-founder and former CEO Bernie Marcus.[1] It describes its agenda as to promote small businesses and has been described as leaning conservative.[2]

Who cares who put it up - the message is still the same - we need to keep you libs as far away as possible from our economy.

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta (Post 22419950)
BTW, nice avatar ....

Your usage confirms what most people saw ... a liitle smart ass racist punk :2 cents:

Watch your step there mooslim. I'm sure the lawyers could add your ass on to any of the many defamation lawsuits they have going.

pimpmaster9000 02-21-2019 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OneHungLo (Post 22420153)
haha no it didn't. It failed miserably and you know it.

Never go full paul markham...

kane 02-21-2019 05:48 PM

To quote Obama, elections have consequences. If the people of New York are not happy with her performances, they can vote her out in 2020.

OneHungLo 02-21-2019 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio (Post 22420228)
Never go full paul markham...

Everything I've read says it was a colossal failure. Can you point me to some literature to the contrary?

Mr Pheer 02-21-2019 11:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane (Post 22420236)
To quote Obama, elections have consequences. If the people of New York are not happy with her performances, they can vote her out in 2020.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

King Mark 02-21-2019 11:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DukeSkywalker (Post 22419717)
They care

No, they don't. Only a small minority give a shit.

pimpmaster9000 02-22-2019 02:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OneHungLo (Post 22420239)
Everything I've read says it was a colossal failure. Can you point me to some literature to the contrary?

I can speak only for yugoslavia...my dad purchased a brand new volkswagen beetle from his first 2 salaries in his first ever job...keep in mind the beetle was a new car back then and considered a good normal car...I spent nearly 20 years of my life in communism and had 6 shops by the time I was 18, my workers had decent salaries with which they could support their families without any problems...everybody I knew had 0 debt and 0 rent free college free healthcare etc...

I have no doubt invader US literature will say everything but invader politics is evil and a massive failure....your western empires depend on exploitation of everybody possible and a democratic system is easy to control with your printed money...I can understand why you hate communism and I am happy to see commies resist you invaders everywhere possible...

OneHungLo 02-22-2019 10:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio (Post 22420357)
I can speak only for yugoslavia...my dad purchased a brand new volkswagen beetle from his first 2 salaries in his first ever job...keep in mind the beetle was a new car back then and considered a good normal car...I spent nearly 20 years of my life in communism and had 6 shops by the time I was 18, my workers had decent salaries with which they could support their families without any problems...everybody I knew had 0 debt and 0 rent free college free healthcare etc...

I have no doubt invader US literature will say everything but invader politics is evil and a massive failure....your western empires depend on exploitation of everybody possible and a democratic system is easy to control with your printed money...I can understand why you hate communism and I am happy to see commies resist you invaders everywhere possible...

That's why I asked you. Surely you can point to something (other than yourself) praising this communism and how it was so wonderful. Like I said, everything I've read on it say it not only failed but failed miserably.


What kind of shops did you have? Were they run like a normal shop? Like you buy products, you mark them up, sell them and keep the profits? How does that all work in a communist society vs capitalistic?

OneHungLo 02-22-2019 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dead Eye (Post 22420327)
No, they don't. Only a small minority give a shit.

Yeah I guess the people that don't work for a living don't care. It's not like they were going to get a job anyways :1orglaugh

King Mark 02-22-2019 10:12 AM

^^do you ever have any idea what you talking about?

OneHungLo 02-22-2019 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dead Eye (Post 22420547)
^^do you ever have any idea what you talking about?

Like i'm sure nobody cares that she cost the state 30 billion in tax revenue and 25,000 jobs.

No biggie.

You know who doesn't care? Probably the people who run in your circle aka the unemployed aka the gibbmedats.

TheSquealer 02-22-2019 10:47 AM

https://i.redd.it/pljph6afz4i21.jpg

pimpmaster9000 02-22-2019 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OneHungLo (Post 22420544)
That's why I asked you. Surely you can point to something (other than yourself) praising this communism and how it was so wonderful. Like I said, everything I've read on it say it not only failed but failed miserably.


What kind of shops did you have? Were they run like a normal shop? Like you buy products, you mark them up, sell them and keep the profits? How does that all work in a communist society vs capitalistic?

dude I had 0 documents for my 6 shops I had 18 unregistered workers and the main shop was 2 floors under the "serbian IRS" branch...I was a software pirate I sold everything from ZX spectrum audio tapes to commodore amiga floppy disks to PC disks to CDs...there was no register, no receipt, no proof of rent...I literally opened up a draw with money and filled my pockets until they bulged up and moved to the next shop...by the time I had registered my first company and opened my first bank account I had 15+ years of doing business under my belt and had millions of $$ in turnover before I walked in to a bank and opened an account out of curiosity...I registered a company over a lawyer and never used it for 14 years after that LOL...thats freedom...dont be jelly :thumbsup

communism failed because of the leaders and of course western pressure...we did not print money like you guys, we did not cheat and loan shark...communism is not inherently evil and does not prevent private business...99% of all people are surprisingly free, like in my example where I just opened up a shop and nobody gave me any shit...you could do shit...just build a house...ask nobody...no gay permits...just build that shit...

I can only speak for yugoslavia, communism worked and it is not up for debate...it was not perfect, I am not saying there were not problems, but the people lived much much better than in capitalism and "democracy" today...

King Mark 02-22-2019 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OneHungLo (Post 22420552)
Like i'm sure nobody cares that she cost the state 30 billion in tax revenue and 25,000 jobs.

No biggie.

You know who doesn't care? Probably the people who run in your circle aka the unemployed aka the gibbmedats.

Unemployed gibbmedats? Lmao

Let's see, your favorite gfy poster (Paul Markham) is an unemployed gibbmedat marriage immigrant. I'm a self employed successful master of the w3bz.

Wanna compare traffic stats?

King Mark 02-22-2019 12:28 PM

Amazon wanna go to NY, better Gibb the residents dat jobs. Or kick rocks. Simple.

TheSquealer 02-22-2019 12:34 PM

The same people arguing against 25,000 jobs and BILLIONS in tax revenue are the same people that cheered on Obama with the longest, slowest and most anemic economic recovery ever, stagnant wage growth, horrible jobs numbers, lowest workforce participation rate ever and who said "those jobs aren't coming back", mocking Trump for saying he'd create jobs etc and then hate Trump for undoing crippling regs on day 1, having a roaring economy, becoming the worlds largest oil producer, having all time low unemployment numbers, rapidly growing manufacturing jobs etc. and then say "Obama did it".

How much do you have to really hate your country to defend failure and hate success?

OneHungLo 02-22-2019 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dead Eye (Post 22420613)
Unemployed gibbmedats? Lmao

Let's see, your favorite gfy poster (Paul Markham) is an unemployed gibbmedat marriage immigrant. I'm a self employed successful master of the w3bz.

Wanna compare traffic stats?

Are you retarded? If you work, pay into the system and then retire, you are not on the gibbs lol.

Be honest - How many people do you know that have for 2 and 3 generations been on the dole? Those are the gibbmedats.

notinmybackyard 02-22-2019 01:59 PM

Just so that I understand this conversation.

A. We're in a forum for pornographers and smut peddlers.
B. There are actually people here arguing for socialism/communism

I'll admit that I want full on government censorship of porn to the point that society becomes a puritan hell hole of horny Amish masturbators. But this is because I know that in such environments the value of a fuck video goes through the roof.

However, the last thing I want is a government system that controls the market place. Without an open market producing and selling smut becomes a very very dangerous occupation.

So although I would love censorship there's no way that I can ever support socialism. At least with the Mafia if you shut your mouth and did your job you could make money and keep from getting killed. ....

But with socialism you might as well just kill yourself.

OneHungLo 02-22-2019 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio (Post 22420611)
dude I had 0 documents for my 6 shops I had 18 unregistered workers and the main shop was 2 floors under the "serbian IRS" branch...I was a software pirate I sold everything from ZX spectrum audio tapes to commodore amiga floppy disks to PC disks to CDs...there was no register, no receipt, no proof of rent...I literally opened up a draw with money and filled my pockets until they bulged up and moved to the next shop...by the time I had registered my first company and opened my first bank account I had 15+ years of doing business under my belt and had millions of $$ in turnover before I walked in to a bank and opened an account out of curiosity...I registered a company over a lawyer and never used it for 14 years after that LOL...thats freedom...dont be jelly :thumbsup

communism failed because of the leaders and of course western pressure...we did not print money like you guys, we did not cheat and loan shark...communism is not inherently evil and does not prevent private business...99% of all people are surprisingly free, like in my example where I just opened up a shop and nobody gave me any shit...you could do shit...just build a house...ask nobody...no gay permits...just build that shit...

I can only speak for yugoslavia, communism worked and it is not up for debate...it was not perfect, I am not saying there were not problems, but the people lived much much better than in capitalism and "democracy" today...


Yeah so cash based pirating is a way to fuel an economy in the 21st century :1orglaugh

I mean come on dude...

Yeah I wish I could stuff my pockets full of ill gotten gains but that's not really a way to run an economy and not overall representative of how communism works :1orglaugh


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:40 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123