![]() |
Cancer Test — Would You ...
If you could take a test to positively determine if you’ll get cancer in your lifetime, would you take it?
Without going into details, a family member is taking the BRCA 1 and 2 test. I’m being urgently urged to take the tests. Though I have yearly breast scans (due to mom having breast cancer twice), I don’t know if I want full body scans to determine my future. I asked a few people if they’d take the tests and nearly all said they would have to think hard about it. It got me curious about y’all..... |
Of course. Early detection means early prevention or at least an easier go of it.
|
Absolutely would. And if this Google rabbit hole I'm about to dive into shows that this exists (never heard of a cancer prediction test) I'm going to take it.
|
My understanding is we're all born with potentially cancerous cells...it just depends on whether they're triggered to go haywire. And it's anybody's guess these days what triggers it.
I'd have to read the specs on this so-called test. |
Cancer is mostly a money making scheme, there are ways to avoid it, the treatments the system give are destructive and best avoided. Don’t smoke, don’t eat much meat, don’t become obese, try to eat organic, don’t drink too much alcohol, eat heathy food, try not to get too stressed about anything if that is possible, don’t get vaccines, don’t take pharma pills, and then almost certainly you will not get cancer. The cancer industry wants you to think cancer is purely genetic so as you don’t know how to avoid it, then you have to pay for their services and treatments.
Breast cancer is normally best left alone, it won’t spread, it will stay put, get walled off by the immune system, do nothing. The cancer industry will pretend to you it is deadly so as they can make money, so they poison and fry your immune system so as it can longer keep it walled off, they chop you up. I know a number of people who have reversed breast cancer naturally, it is very simple. Also remember that mammograms are carcinogenic, all part of the scam. |
Yes, of course I would - Forewarned is forearmed...
|
Yes definitely
|
yes, sure., why not ?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I just went for a blood test for markers, was scared to see the results, but it's ok, I then drank a bottle of French red wine :)
|
Yes i would...
|
Cut your tits off already!
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Seems some of you lemmings are intent on learning your lessons the hard way |
I think surgeons are amazing.
Most other doctors fuck you up worse than when you came in.. Especially with big pharma. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I've schooled you time and again on this stuff, so give it a rest already. The nonsense you preach is tantamount to snake-oil quackery. You should be ashamed of the danger your mis-information poses. |
Just something to consider:
Quote:
|
Has anyone done the research on the tests? I haven’t yet but all doctors encouraged me to do it.
Family history is important in a strange way. My mother’s father, my grandfather, had eight sisters and all died of breast cancer. Mom had it twice so the odds are against me. But, I take after my father’s side of the family. Not so great considering my dad had his first heart attack in this mid-50’s and his sister died of a heart attack at age 55. Genetics study is fascinating and I wish I’d gone into it. I’m curious why the BRCA gene test isn’t publicized more. If it really worked, would people have it? I’m torn because knowing doesn’t matter. I can’t change my genes or cells and nothing stops or cures cancer. Even if removed and you’re cancer free, it isn’t cured, just arrested. It may return or may not. I’d not want to know because I can’t fix it. I’d worry so much I’d have that heart attack. But..... you can overthink it and go crazy. How accurate is the test? If genetics say no, would you believe a test? “It ain’t so simple” as someone told me at lunch today. |
Quote:
“Try not to get stressed” is equivalent to “don’t live” because everyone has stress. Mom had a skinny friend who had no kids, wealthy,healthy,happy, vegitarian, no drugs, no smoke or drink. Died at 72 of breast cancer with no family history. She did nothing and died. Was diagnosed a month previous. She was so positive and h@ppy in life, too. How rich did someone get from her having cancer!? Hmm?? |
I do not want to know !
|
Quote:
One has to go to the root of how mainstream science works, look into who funds the studies, why they do so, then it becomes clear how a false view of diseases like cancer is built up. If a treatment works too well the funding for the studies get pulled, the researchers aren’t allowed to disclose their early findings. At the same time the wealthy will not pump money into products that aren’t patentable, so the natural cures for cancer don’t become ‘official’ as nobody will pay out the money required for them to become official. That is how mainstream pharma science is built up and that is why it is an illusion. What you and others learn at college is simply the pharma illusion, which is a system designed to profit, to make a killing. Many people are breaking free from the pharma paradigm and reversing cancers naturally |
Quote:
|
Cancer is caused by a lot of things besides genetics so no way they could ever do a test like that.
Perhaps some cheap once a year test would eork. |
Quote:
If you have breast cancer, still get the root canals removed and it will go away, as long as you are otherwise healthy and not immunosurpressed https://www.systemicdentist.com/blog/2017/12/1/dr-panahpours-take-the-root-canal-breast-cancer-connection |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:45 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123