For king peniswaffle

**CaptainHowdy** · 11-17-2018, 05:51 AM

Here we go again . . .

**crockett** · 11-17-2018, 06:22 AM

Originally posted by CaptainHowdy

Here we go again . . .

How is it you never manage to be worried when peniswaffle starts a topic or onwebcam, the Matt twins, one hunglow or any of the other retarded red hats.. You only seem bothered if I post one..

Do my topics hurt your feelings or ego or something?

**2MuchMark** · 11-18-2018, 05:56 AM

Originally posted by crockett

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/ar...lready-falling

Oil Demand for Cars Is Already Falling
Electric vehicles are displacing hundreds of thousands of barrels a day, exceeding expectations

Oil use for cars peaks in the mid-2020s, but petrochemicals, trucks, planes and ships still keep overall oil demand on a rising trend. Improvements in fuel efficiency in the conventional car fleet avoid three-times more in potential demand than the 3 million barrels per day (mb/d) displaced by 300 million electric cars on the road in 2040.

He won't read it and even if he did, he wouldn't believe it. Because: Maths, scienceseses...

**Acepimp** · 11-18-2018, 06:38 AM

Electric cars are actually worse for the environment when you factor in the pollution involved in transporting all the components to the factory, and the pollution involved in mining for the materials to make the batteries.

**Bladewire** · 11-18-2018, 08:27 AM

Hey look AssPimple and OneHungHoe logged in the same time and started posting in different threads.

**Acepimp** · 11-18-2018, 11:30 AM

Originally posted by Bladewire

Hey look AssPimple and OneHungHoe logged in the same time and started posting in different threads.

**astronaut x** · 11-18-2018, 11:30 AM

Originally posted by Acepimp

Electric cars are actually worse for the environment when you factor in the pollution involved in transporting all the components to the factory, and the pollution involved in mining for the materials to make the batteries.

Sure. ok

No wonder you are a red hat.

**2MuchMark** · 11-18-2018, 12:38 PM

Originally posted by astronaut x

Originally posted by Acepimp

Electric cars are actually worse for the environment when you factor in the pollution involved in transporting all the components to the factory, and the pollution involved in mining for the materials to make the batteries.

Sure. ok

No wonder you are a red hat.

He couldn't qualify for anything else.

**Acepimp** · 11-18-2018, 12:47 PM

Originally posted by astronaut x

Sure. ok

No wonder you are a red hat.

Wrong again. Independent former Dem voter. #WalkAway

**kane** · 11-18-2018, 01:05 PM

The problem is that a lot of people don't realize that electric cars aren't the end of a process, they are the beginning. First, we make electric cars. Second, we move away from fossil fuels. Eventually we end up in a place where we have clean electric cars getting their power from clean, renewable energy sources.

**crockett** · 11-18-2018, 01:11 PM

Originally posted by Acepimp

Electric cars are actually worse for the environment when you factor in the pollution involved in transporting all the components to the factory, and the pollution involved in mining for the materials to make the batteries.

So you think there is no pollution to build non electric cars? Are you really this dumb?

**MaDalton** · 11-18-2018, 02:37 PM

if the car would be invented today, you would have the same idiots on here defending the horse and Donald Trump as their master promising to save the jobs of blacksmiths.

PS: I do think that hydrogen fuel cells are the future - granted the hydrogen is generated with renewable energies.

And I think whoever thinks in 2018 that coal and oil are future technologies needs his head checked

For king peniswaffle

For king peniswaffle

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment