Mueller seizes $42 million mansion of Russian oligarch in Manhattan
 

Mueller's investigation turns an additional $42 million profit! Manafort was on Oleg Deripaska's payrollfor over a decade and the current occupant of the mansion is Ivanka's Trump's Russian best friend & travelling buddy Dasha Zhukova.

“One of Zhukova’s good friends is Ivanka Trump. The two are so close that Zhukova and Abramovich often traveled and socialized with Trump and her husband, presidential son-in-law/adviser Jared Kushner, all over the world — from jet-setting hot spots in Russia and Croatia to Aspen and New York,"

Feds seize $42 million mansion of Russian oligarch linked to Paul Manafort

Federal officials “froze” a sprawling Upper East Side Manhattan mansion owned by Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska, the New York Post reported Monday.

For years, former Trump campaign manager and convicted felon Paul Manafort was on Deripaska’s payroll.

The seizure is the result of the Russian oligarch being placed on the U.S. sanctions list after allegations he is “involved in murder, money-laundering, bribery and racketeering.”

Manafort was convicted in federal court in Virginia on eight counts and pleaded guilty to two additional counts in Washington, DC federal court.

The five story mansion, a half block east of Central Park, was built in 1899. Deripaska purchased it for $42,500,000 in 2008.

The mansion is currently occupied by Dasha Zhukova, the ex-wife of Russian oligarch Roman Abrmovich, who is business partners with Deripaska.

“One of Zhukova’s good friends is Ivanka Trump. The two are so close that Zhukova and Abramovich often traveled and socialized with Trump and her husband, presidential son-in-law/adviser Jared Kushner, all over the world — from jet-setting hot spots in Russia and Croatia to Aspen and New York,” the NY Post explained.

“Zhukova is dating Greek shipping heir Stavros Niarchos, while Abramovich reportedly is dating Deripaska’s estranged wife, Polina Deripaska,” the NY Post added.

FBI agents have reportedly sought Deripaska’s cooperation as part of the special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into the 2016 Trump campaign.

Alt-right conspiracy response spinning this as not bad in 3.. 2.. 1..

This is what I call #winning

Deripaska was a FBI informant who personally worked for Mueller himself. As in he wasn't working on Trump's behalf.. He was working on the FBI's behalf.

Mueller may have a conflict — and it leads directly to a Russian oligarch
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-ho...ssian-oligarch

Mueller is doing cover up..

There's the conspiracy response!

No integrity with Matt26z aka Onwebcam just lies and distractions

"Anything you think is good is actually secretly bad" dumbass get a new script

They can't get away with it much longer.

Republicans are allowing it for now because of the midterms.

I wonder how much taxpayers will recoup from the Trump tower and all those golf courses.

He worked as an FBI informant.. He admitted it himself

Russian oligarch, Justice Department and a clear case of collusion
https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/40...e-of-collusion


The DOJ and FBI is trying to say he was "under recruitment" but you don't ask a man to put up millions of his own money to free an agent unless you have a pretty damn good relationship

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:thumbsup

$0 :2 cents:

So if I understand correctly, you're saying that the Mueller investigation is a sham designed to cover up Meuller's previous interaction with Deripaska? That seems a little late, since information about their operation was known to the State Department while the FBI was working with Deripaska.

It also seems unlikely that Mueller would get six people pleading guilty to crimes like "conspiracy against the united states" if this were a sham investigation. On top of that, there are two dozen indictments. An indictment is a lot more than an accusation. It means that Meuller's team is prepared to prove in a court of law that these people committed crimes.

Covering up them (FBI/DOJ//CIA/DNC/etc) trying to rig the election.


FBI’s smoking gun: Redactions protected political embarrassment, not ‘national security’
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-ho...arrassment-not

Anyone paying any attention already knew that.

As far as the indictments go.... Mueller is protecting the deep state.. Which Trump is not....

Rosenstein pulled a fast one on Trump in suggesting he fire Comey so they could put Mueller in place to cover everything up.. Rosenstein is the middleman between Mueller and IG Horowitz investigations.. He alone determines what we find out.. He is th eone behind those redactions...

The smoking gun is a redacted paragraph that says the FBI met with the DNC's head lawyers? Based on this, and other dubious claims - like the outright lie that the investigation into the Trump campaign was spurred by the Steele dossier (source - it was the Australian ambassador) - the author concludes that there's sufficient evidence to say there was a criminal conspiracy instigated by the DOJ against Trump:

"There is now a concrete storyline backed by irrefutable evidence: The FBI allowed itself to take political opposition research created by one party to defeat another in an election, treated it like actionable intelligence, presented it to the court as substantiated, and then used it to justify spying on an adviser for the campaign of that party's duly chosen nominee for president in the final days of a presidential election."

That is quite a leap - from redacted mention of a meeting, to a conspiracy against the Trump campaign. Wouldn't it make sense that the FBI would be in contact with DNC representatives considering they'd been hacked? There are a lot of reasons why the FBI and the DNC's lawyers may have had contact, and why it might have been redacted. That doesn't prove wrongdoing, and it certainly doesn't prove the assertion that there was a criminal conspiracy against Trump.

Finally it's important to note that both of your sources are not investigative - they're opinion pieces by the same author, John Solomon, who has a long history of dubious reporting. Here's a piece describing his reputation among journalists.

The DNC wasn't hacked by Russia.. False flag to bring about everything else.. Plus to cover up who really leaked the emails. Every single bit of this shit has been testified about before Congress.. It's not "conspiracy theory" it's a real fucking conspiracy.. Quit watching the same fucking news channels that lied to you all along and do some research..

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

everything can explain everything, just wait for the last piece of puzzle consisting of infinite pieces. but that last piece will tie it all together.

your black hole conspiracy theory.

peter strzok!

There's no blabk hole. It's been the same thing all along.. They framed Trump to try and rig the election.. They lost and doubled down.. It's that simple.. Denying it after the monumental information before you is, well, INSANE.

Peter Strzok!

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:thumbsup

Every time you allege one of these conspiracies, it necessitates other conspiracies to explain it. You claim that the DOJ hacked the DNC, then covered it up. Also that they were actively working against Trump's campaign, and that afterwards they began a sham investigation which - even though its fake - produced half a dozen guilty pleas and two dozen indictments.

And in order to totally validate Trump's world view, there needs to be more conspiracies - Global Warming is a hoax, despite being accepted as fact by the scientific community. The mainstream press is working against the President. Obama was a Kenyan. Think of how many people would need to work together to make even one of those conspiracies a reality.

Im wondering at what point this stops. At what point do you say "hey, this is all getting a little bit difficult to believe." All of these are extraordinary accusations that don't have a fraction of the evidence needed to support them.

I didn't claim the DOJ hacked the DNC.. An insider leaked the emails. They made up the hack story to use it in the "Russia collusion" frame up.

Assange offered to tell who it was that leaked the email for political asylum.. He actually had a deal already but Comey killed it... Because they don't want it known.. Because it kills their narrative.

It's his job to pretend to be American and spread conspiracies & disinformation. He's an anonymous alt-right nic posting 100% alt-right hate politics on a porn industry board. St. Petersburg troll farm trolls make $778 USD a month. His life really sucks

Talking to Onwebcam is like punching yourself in the balls. You only ever actually get anything out of it when you stop doing it.

It doesn't stop! You'll see. Everything is linked. We all have been waiting for his theory to all to come together since the Mueller investigation launched.

Actually $777 just because

Yeah, I think I gotta stop. I'm getting a headache. :(

Truth hurts

That's why all you do is lie! Coward

You really can't argue with someone who actively believes that every authority is complicit in an conspiracy, because it invalidates any source you bring to the table.

If you truly believe that the entire federal law enforcement apparatus AND the media is in on a secret mission to defame the President, then I can't quote law enforcement or media sources to make my point.

By the way, if this were remotely true, it would be the most massive criminal conspiracy in the history of the world. The government can't even run the fucking post office, and you think they've concocted the most brilliant cover-up ever. I just don't even know, man.

It is pretty clear to me ...... !

https://cdn.jwplayer.com/thumbs/sXkiFZ8z-1280.jpg

:1orglaugh

Break out your popcorn.. You're going to need it. Trump just spent the whole day with Rosenstein...

He has a new prediction or excuse each week as he has to move the goal posts a bit farther out to lala land after his last reason for Muller's investigation to have been a fraud.

He used to claim Trump and Muller were secretly working together to lock Hillary up..

The guy us either a Russian bot or fucking bat shit insane..

How much does Media Matters pay you?

Funny how you guys were all up in arms when Loretta Lynch met with Clinton, on the tarmac ..... :warning:warning

As if this is the first time they've had a meeting... They met the day before Mueller was appointed in fact.. Along with Mueller.

Difference between now and then, then Rosenstein thought he was getting rid of a President.. This time he's concerned about his future for trying to do just that.

Former Top FBI Lawyer Testified that Rosenstein “Seriously” Considered Secretly Recording Trump
https://saraacarter.com/former-top-f...cording-trump/