![]() |
The Real Origination Story of the Trump-Russia Investigation
The Trump-Russia investigation did not originate with Carter Page or George Papadopoulos. It originated with the Obama administration.
https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/...ation-origins/ It was NY Times that fished out the names of Trump early policy advisors.. |
Wow surprisingly they nailed it with that article. Most articles get some truth and lies/errors mixed in. Who ever the writer of that article is nailed it spot on!
What is really surprising that the co founder of Fusion GPS Simpson told the Senate Judiciary that Steel told him FBI had a spy in the Trump campaign. |
Quote:
|
Sure, sure..
|
Quote:
|
This applies right about now you alt right hate fake nic trolling loser BITCH!
|
Looks legit..lol
|
In other Russia Narrative news....
Swedes are being told by their own government to prepare for war. With Russia, and not with the Muslims. YOUR MEDIA IS AT WAR WITH YOU, just like ours is, and they're LAUGHING AT YOU. Put aside your party politics and let's fight a common foe. |
I mean, seriously Americans...Obama and Clinton belong in the past, as does the Russia narrative.
Move on, look ahead. It's dysgenic not to. Russians and Chinese could easily look at the American posters here and think "OMG, they really are under Jewish yoke. Their media has colonized them." |
Quote:
CNN Falls Below Kids Network Nickelodeon in Cable Ratings https://www.westernjournal.com/cnn-f...cable-ratings/ Children are smarter than liberals :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh |
Quote:
Take your kids' advice. They'll have to navigate the future that you create. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
|
Back in January, Democrats confidently predicted a "blue wave" would wipe out Republican control of Congress in this year's midterms -- as polls showed a massive lead for the party in the so-called generic ballot.
This forecast is looking less certain as that lead shrinks by the week, with one poll even showing Republicans on top. The "generic" ballot asks voters which party they plan to support, without getting into specific candidates. As recently as April, a Reuters poll showed Democrats with a 13-point lead. Some Democrats cited various surveys, including a CNN poll in December that showed an 18-point lead, as proof that they'd at least claim the House in November. “#Megatsunami next November,” predicted an excited Rep. Ted Lieu, D-Calif. I learned a new word today: Megatsunami. As in, the 18 point lead Dems have in the generic ballot point to a Democratic #Megatsunami next November. https://t.co/gl5xSigoz4 — Ted Lieu (@tedlieu) December 20, 2017 But that lead has all but disappeared, with Reuters' latest poll showing a slight Republican edge of less than 2 percent. The trend is reflected in other polls. A CNN poll this month showed the Democratic lead at just 3 percent, down from 16 percent in February. |
Quote:
Crackpot Russians and Ruski loving Americans trying to deflect. Anyways... back to my question.. Can you show me a single day in Trumps presidency where he has not lied openly to the American public. Since you like Downey so much might want to see what he's got to say about current world affairs https://www.smh.com.au/world/asia/ch...28-p4zc60.html China is not Russia. "Russia is a declining power, desperate for international relevance and lashing out left, right and centre," he said. "China is a rising power - it's completely different - China doesn't have territorial ambitions. China is much more focussed on securing its domestic economy and to secure its domestic economy it needs secure sources of supply, stable really, stable sources of supply. Of raw materials, food and so-on." |
Quote:
Those are the kinds of lies that real people care about. |
Quote:
FBI Informant Stefan Halper Accused Of Making ‘False’ And ‘Absurd’ Allegations About Russian Infiltration At Cambridge Halper Made 'False' Claims About Ru | The Daily Caller Australian diplomat whose tip prompted FBI’s Russia-probe has tie to Clintons http://thehill.com/376858-australian...ie-to-clintons |
Trumpaeda like-a de pee-a!
|
lol. Chumpanzess out deflecting away from the fact the Liar in Chief loves the Russians and is corrupt.
Obama, emails, benghazi..... Typical playbook Obama tapped his phone=lie no one in his campaign talked to russian=lie spy gate=lie gate |
Quote:
|
Quote:
As to the Clinton donation, first it was not into the Clintons bank account it was to the Clinton Foundation, and there were strict conditions written in to that deal, it was given to combat HIV in the pacific region and only given after all other alternatives were looked at. The Clinton foundation were doing the best work, reaching the most people.. for the least cost. And given how much the Aids epidemic in the region was slowed, EXTREMELY successful. From the Australian side, it was one of the best charity investments we ever made with real life saving results that indirectly benefit our country. Whats Trumps charity again..? oh that's right he's a con man and not allowed to have one it was closed on him for fraud.. "The Trump Foundation acknowledged violating a legal prohibition against a "self-dealing" that bars nonprofit leaders from funneling their charity's money to themselves, their businesses or their families" No doubt you will see those kind of charges being brought against the Trump family again.. I'm guessing. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It was a fucking slush fund. They accepted the "donations" through the "foundation" and then payed themselves and bribes out of it. If you needed to be bought all you needed was your own "charity" and the Clinton Foundation would "grant" the money to you or to themselves... No doubt they have numerous other "charities" set up themselves that they "granted" to. The "foundation" tells you themselves they don't do any actual charity work. They "grant" all the money. |
Quote:
Do you think anyone here cares about his tax returns? LOL. The straws to grasp at are getting smaller and shorter. This is why the anti-Trumpers are losing so badly. By all means, let's discuss his doctor's note next. |
What I don't understand in this whole SpyGate thing.
Is its obvious, right or wrong! that the Democrats were convinced the Russians had infiltrated and compromised the Republican party. The question should be not why they had one person in there, but why didn't they have 100. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think the Republicans should be convinced of something similar for the upcoming election - and they should do the exact same kind of investigations into whoever the Democrats run. I mean, it will be for their own good, from what I understand the defense is. Nobody will complain about that... |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:11 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123