The real truth about fake news - Punditfact shows FOX News lies 60% of the time
 

And only tells the truth 22% of the time.

FOX's file: | PunditFact


http://www.apwealth.com/uploads/3/2/...prise_orig.jpg

Just what people who want America to fail love, Americans being lied to by the right :2 cents:

The funny thing? Only about 0.2% of Americans even understand what "propaganda" is, how it works and what happens to them when they are under the influence of it. Wild.

(Goes for MSNBC and CNN too. All the cable news channels are propagandists.)

Aaaaaand Politifact is lying. Let's review:

NEWT GINGRICH
Democratic National Committee staffer Seth Rich "apparently was assassinated at 4 in the morning, having given WikiLeaks something like 53,000 emails and 17,000 attachments. ... It turns out, it wasn’t the Russians." - Rated as "Pants on fire"

Reality:
EXCLUSIVE: Outrage at Julian Assange for implicating murdered DNC staffer in email leak and offering $20k reward - as the victim's parents accuse Wikileaks founder of ‘politicizing this horrible tragedy’

We know Seth Rich worked in IT at the DNC. Having access to the server, it would be easy for someone to use a flash drive to copy the data and hand it off to wikileaks.

Here's the former NSA technical director explaining the data was transferred much too fast to be sent online to "the Russians", meaning it was likely a USB drive:


So it was likely a USB drive, Rich had access, he was pissed that Debbie Shultz & Hillary rigged the primaries, he gets whacked, Assange offers $20K reward for the 1st time ever, and the DNC refused to let the FBI examine their server for any evidence of a hack. But it was "the Russians" because the dems said so.
Wow. Fred got duped.


JESSE WATTERS
Says John Podesta’s email password was "password." - Rated as "Pants on Fire"

Reality:
Assange says a 14-year-old could have hacked Democratic emails as he reveals John Podesta’s password was 'password'

Assange and wikileaks have never published info that was shown to be false. Fred got duped.


SEAN HANNITY
"During the (Benghazi) attack, a stand-down order was given, and our troops were told to change their clothes four times." - Rated as "Mostly False"

Reality:
Benghazi Probe Finds Marines' Response Was Slowed by Uniform Changes

From congressional testimony: The Marine commander of the FAST platoon, unnamed in the report, testified that the Marines' orders changed constantly as they waited to depart.

"We were told multiple times to change what we were wearing, to change from cammies into civilian attire, civilian attire into cammies, cammies into civilian attire," he said. - Fred got duped.


BILL O'REILLY
Says Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland "voted, so the folks know, in Washington, D.C., to keep guns away from private citizens." - Rated as "False" because "He never heard this case"

Reality:
Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland's best-known vote - Business Insider

Because Garland called for a review of the DC Circuit Court's ruling, even though he took no official position on the case, gun-rights advocates have slammed him for favoring gun control. - Fred got duped.

I could go on, but I'm too busy making money online.

You guys should try it, since you're so bad at this politics stuff.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

^^ THIS is accurate.

Propaganda Bill In Congress Could Give America Its Very Own Ministry Of Truth

And this is on top of Operation Mockingbird, running for decades

:pimp

Mr. Ace:

Many countries, especially the US, have been victim to incredible amounts of fake news and other types of misinformation.

I honestly didn't believe it myself until I started to hear incredible (meaning, ridiculous) stories coming from my brother.

We used to get our news from the newspaper and local television stations. Today, most people are glued to facebook. This plus general unhappyness made millions of people prime targets for fake news and propaganda.

I know you and I disagree on just about everything, but I can tell you this. As an "outsider", I was able to see the devastation this was causing. It's still incredible.

I promise you that you are wrong. Do this: For a while, pretend I'm right, and see if you can do your own digging to spot the lies you've been told. It won't be that hard.

Acepimp, here's a perfect example.

Are you going to defend this horseshit that was just broadcast on FOX today?

:1orglaugh Could you be a little more specific? What did i post that's wrong?

:helpme

Well of course that doctor is a paid big pharma shill. Its sad that this propaganda exists.

When it comes to Fox News, I only watch Tucker Crlson, Hannity, and Lou Dobbs, the true patriots who prefer truth. I like Judge Napolitano as well for his commentary.

So yes you're right that Fox will broadcast lies sometimes. Still less than the other 2 cable networks.

Nice to see iron Mike doing something good.

:rasta

never has someone put so much energy into being wrong.

Feel free to elaborate :1orglaugh

:pimp

Fox News is a joke. It's just stunning. It's like there is "Fox News" and then "Everyone else".

Look at your sig ..... pretty clear, no ?

So, no one can show that I'm wrong and provide a citation. Got it

:1orglaugh

Already proved you wrong and fake news ...

Why would I want to lose my time , and post a link to one of your fake stories that fit your simplemind agenda .

Really ?????????


https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...ex-slaves.html

LOL ... :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Holy shit you're dumb! - "The interview about an unrelated topic is unconfirmed, therefore Julian Assange is wrong, the NSA technical head is wrong, and congressional testimony about Benghazi is fake!"

LOL!!

How do you even tie your shoes, being so dumb??

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

:pimp

hey is this joshua g? did he just buy an old nick and start posting with this one instead?

you can't mask crazy

I am neither JoshuaG or crazy. Julian Assange has NEVER posted false info. But if you can prove him (or me) wrong, go ahead. I'll be waiting LOL

:pimp

Just about all of it. :) But if you want something specific, Pizzagate is a story you've tossed into another thread.


DUDE!! That's.... that's amazing! Well done sir! Maybe I was wrong about you...

And like that, my hard-on has shrivelled and died. Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity are 2 of the biggest ass-lickers ever. Hannity? HANNITY? Dude... really... omg...


/facepalm


Interesting....

So Julian Assange is fake news, the NSA top guy is fake news, the congressional testimony on Benghazi is fake news, Tucker is fake news, and Hannity is a fake news ass-licker?

It appears you're living in Superman's Bizzaro world, where everything is opposite of reality.

Assange has never posted false info. Hannity and Tucker have the number 1 and 2 top-rated cable news shows. Sorry if reporting on Democrat corruption is so triggering for you, but the facts are what they are.

:pimp

Your NSA top guy has been out of the NSA for 18 years. He was NSA from 1970 through 2001. His information is out of date. He also has a personal vendetta against the NSA because a project he helped create was not selected to be used.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Willia...gence_official)

.

*Sigh..* Sarettah: Does any of that mean that he's wrong about the data transfer rate of the DNC leaks, which was shown to be very fast? You're a smart person, unlike some of these other clowns. The fast transfer rate means a local drive was used, not an internet connection to "Russian hackers." Furthermore, why did the dems refuse to let the FBI examine the server for evidence of hacking?

So to recap- fast transfer rate indicating internal LEAK, not a hack, and NO evidence of any hacking has been presented.

But Binney has been out for a while so it's all fake! Come on man, you're smarter than this.

:2 cents:

the fact you corrected the syntax of the way I spelled it and that you did not start posting here until that nick was banned or left is pretty suspect.

maybe its time to find a new hobby? being perpetually banned on a board where you get along with nobody isn't really productive. Just a suggestion anyway, if you want to keep wasting your life with this shit go for it.

Where did Binney get the data from that the transfer happened as fast as he says?

Nowhere have I found a reference other than that's "what he heard".

A whole lot of Trump supporters base their analysis on "what they heard" ther same way Trump himself based most of his arguments during the campaign on "What he heard".

So according to you and the other conservafucks, rumors are more accurate than facts.

.

Where have the democrats provided ANY evidence of any kind of hack, much less 'the Russians?' :1orglaugh

This article is rather long, but it lays out the details:

A New Report Raises Big Questions About Last Year’s DNC Hack

"... the first decisive findings, made public in the paper dated July 9, concerned the volume of the supposedly hacked material and what is called the transfer rate—the time a remote hack would require. The metadata established several facts in this regard with granular precision: On the evening of July 5, 2016, 1,976 megabytes of data were downloaded from the DNC’s server. The operation took 87 seconds. This yields a transfer rate of 22.7 megabytes per second.

These statistics are matters of record and essential to disproving the hack theory. No Internet service provider, such as a hacker would have had to use in mid-2016, was capable of downloading data at this speed. "

~ So it was a transfer directly from the server. And who had access and was disgruntled at the theft of the primary from Bernie? Hmm who could it be..?

"But the Russians!" scream the dems, with no evidence provided, denying FBI examination.

Come on man, use some logic :1orglaugh

:rasta

You are insulting JoshuaG / DynaMo ......

Glen, i don't know Josh or you and have been posting off and on for 6 yrs.

I used to debate with L-pink daily about how i liked Bernie's plan.

Have a great new year :thumbsup

:cool-smil

:thumbsup

Josh used to say the exact same thing.

:1orglaugh