swoit = the next xpics
 

?

ccbill wouldn't let it happen.

here are some interesting Xpics articles:
http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,12412,00.html
http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,15901,00.html

i dont mean in scamming cc terms.. i mean in webmaster terms

http://www.swoit.com/images/swoitmodel.gif

THe thing that doesnt make sense about "The Swoit Model" is affiliates send traffic, and partners 'supply sites'...

But how is the money REALLY split up?

Is it % by # of sites the paysite operators submitted?

-- because that opens doors for lots of problems...like people mass/trash submitting. People submitting template splash page sites with lower quality carbon-copy members areas VS. someone with 1 kickass site thats worth 100 of those cloned sites. So the webmaster with 1 good site gets stiffed with a much smaller share than the guy that submitted the 100 far lower quality sites??

Is it a flat % or payout when someone joins a participating paysite? Whats to stop Swoit from saying an unusally large % of the surfers signed up for sites that are owned/operated by Swoit (directly or indirectly)


Or like someone said... Someone might have a really good, jam packed members area, but a weaker front end that doesnt pull initial sales. But once swoit surfers find this guy and his jam packed members area they suck him dry -- and he gets paid nothing??

It's sounds like a great idea... but I see problems.

Maybe "Swoit" can come along and publicly explain (since the site doesn't seem to)

Complex deals that people can't figure out easily never work, except for the promotors.