Solving the Mystery of Building 7
 

Of course by "mystery", you mean "the insane rantings of paranoid conspiracy lunatics".

Thankfully you found a washed up, almost dead actor to explain it all to us.

I lasted three minutes and.... Oh hell no.

This video talks about "common office fires" as if there was no real cause for the collapse. It was more like the building was hit by burning debris from the crash itself, caught fire, and then the fires continued all day. Then we have both towers falling - there is seismic damage, more debris hitting the building. All of this combined caused some of the girders to give way leading to progressive collapse.

Here is what really happened:
https://www.nist.gov/pba/questions-a...-investigation

One side of building had a hugh gouge in it and this is the primary reason it collapsed. The fireman discussed what appeared to be its imminent collapse because of the gash and that is why it was decided to withdraw them. There is only mystery among people that are ignorant.

I am surprised to see you're not onto this one yet

It wouldn't collapse in perfect controlled demolition style, this is the problem that architects have, unless the controlled demos are officially admitted, the thousands of architects and engineers will continue to speak out

OF COURSE it was a controlled demolition. It's all been admitted. The building's owner even said it in an interview they decided to pull it down.

People actually believe it was an office fire that caused the building to drop in 7 seconds? :1orglaugh

SKIP TO 2:08 in the above video- watch several guys say the building is about to blow.

HERE'S THE DEAL- You can't wire a large building in a couple hours. It would take weeks. So it was planned. The owner also admitted that they came up with the NEW DESIGN for wtc7 in April 2000.

Just look it up :thumbsup

Total nonsense.

Yes, it would collapse like this.

When they do professional demo on a building they put explosives at the weak points so the structure fails. In this case - and in most cases when this happens - the weak points gave way, causing the rest to collapse.

The large gash in its side is primarily what brought the building down and this was all brought out with video of the gash and the conversations of the fireman being ordered to evacuate the building and why they were being ordered to evacuate. This was made public not long after the events at the time. I will in no way rehash what has been public knowledge for years. It is nonsensical to do so, but your probably can find someone to play the game with you.

This will be my last comment to you because it is clear to me that you either are just a troll or another nutcase. The owner of the building has explained what he meant when he said to "pull it". I will now, not put you on ignore, but will ignore any further comments that you have to make about the events of 911. I am completely schooled on the events of 9/11 and will not rehash the events with you or any other person on this board or on this earth. There is nothing new for me to learn about that day.

Hey Buddy- Buildings don't fall straight down unless all the key structural points are severed at the same time.

Your theory is not possible. Get some facts. :2 cents:

Notice all the conspiracy nuts are also Trump supporters? Why is that? Why because they are fucking nuts..

Facts ? WHAT Facts ? This is GFY after all ! :Graucho

You fucking conspiracy fools are absolute retards. You guys all use the same pictures of the "front" of building 7 to claim it suffered no damage because it's "looks" ok..

The truth is the other WTC 1 building fell directly behind it. The entire back side of WTC7 was damaged severely by the falling debris from WTC 1 and fires had been raging inside the building for over 7 hours but due to the chaos and lose of life from the other two buildings collapses, fire fighters could not attempt to fight it..


The building failed because the heat damaged the steal structure to the point it finally gave in..


This explains what happened to WTC 7 so simply even a conspiracy retard can understand.




This is pictures of the back side of WTC 7 and the damage it took.. The pic is from your own conspiracy nut job site...

https://www.infowars.com/images2/sept11/Z-1.jpg



1. WTC 1 showered WTC 7 with debris, igniting fires and destroying the sprinkler system.
2. Long-duration fires undermined the steelwork supporting the eastern portion of the 10th floor, causing it to collapse.
3. The eastern portion of 10th floor fell onto a fire-weakened ninth floor, causing its eastern section to collapse.
4. A downward cascade of floor collapses ensued.
5. As the collapse progressed, interior columns buckled.
6. Floor framing supported by the buckling columns fell, causing failure to propagate to the top of the building, which manifested itself in the collapse of the east penthouse.
7. Falling debris impacted beams at the edges of the intact portion of the structure, causing failure to progress across the building.
8. You fucking conspiracy retards are morons.

Oh look, this Nolt has a Heightened Sense of Perception and a Self Propelling Stomach

.

Hey look another conspiracy nut who also supports Trump.. Hummmmmm I guess I was right...

nothing like a conspiracy theory to start the day off.

Happy Canada Day ! :Graucho

It wouldn't have all collapsed exactly the same time, if it was that easy to get a building to collapse safely into it's own footprint, controlled demos wouldn't be required, buildings would just be set on fire. This is why the thousands of Architects and Engineers who've looked into it are calling it out. :2 cents:

Crockett,

You also told us that Trump could never get elected, you need to learn to think for yourself and carefully analyze a situation, going through all the evidence available, rather than parroting whatever propaganda you've placed your trust in. :2 cents:

Crockett you are surely being paid by the government to post all this stuff, otherwise it makes no sense at all as to why you'd continue setting yourself up to get slam-dunked daily in public view

i just thought the same..... :-)

There's a simple explanation, lots of anti-establishment people who don't trust government and know how to spot propaganda when they see it, realized that Trump was less corrupt than Hillary :2 cents:

that is because he did not believe that there are so many brainless bodies in USA.
if fact NOBODY in the world believed before that USA is so full of brainless bodies.
thanks for proving this to us. we know now how reliable USA is for the rest of the world.
we know now that NOBODY should follow your example.
you guys helped a lot to destroy the right radical parties in europe. without trump this idiots would not learn what can happen when brains are in switched off mode.

It's because you were taking fake news as fact, you've been manipulated, just like you have on 9/11, but it's going to be very hard for anyone to convince you of that :2 cents:

your problem is, that you try to explain the world what democrathy is but you do not have one. you build up a society what can choose between HIV and cancer. your idols and ideals are just under your shirt.

with other words. YOU FAILED ! and instead of making it better you made it worse!

Euro Physics News isn't happy about the 9/11 controlled demolitions, but let's trust CNN instead shall we

https://www.europhysicsnews.org/arti...2016474p21.pdf

I am well aware that the current system is corrupt and doesn't work, if a good person really does get to power e.g. someone like Jeremy Corbyn in the UK, they'll be killed off

However it's still not as bad as the EU dictatorship where there is even less choice

I think its fairly well documented and accepted that the building fell because there was a fire in a trash can in a lounge on the 3rd floor. Gotta make sure that ciggy is put out before you toss it in the trash, people.

https://youtu.be/0l1rERWldoM

Now that's an office fire building still standing.

Conclusion
It bears repeating that fires have never caused the total
collapse of a steel-framed high-rise before or since 9/11.
Did we witness an unprecedented event three separate
times on September 11, 2001? The NIST reports, which
attempted to support that unlikely conclusion, fail to persuade
a growing number of architects, engineers, and
scientists. Instead, the evidence points overwhelmingly
to the conclusion that all three buildings were destroyed
by controlled demolition. Given the far-reaching implications,
it is morally imperative that this hypothesis be
the subject of a truly scientific and impartial investigation
by responsible authorities. n

You also told us the moon landings were faked... Hummmm lets see making the wrong guess on a political election or proclaiming every major govt in the world is in on a giant hoax including our allies & foes as well as countless thousands of people who were involved..

Lets see believing in a massive conspiracy bigger than anything that has ever happened before and now adding a massive 9/11 conspiracy on top of it or guessing the wrong political candidate. Yea it's "almost" the same..

Fucking conspiracy nuts does reality not even enter your brain? Leave your fucking basement for fucks sake... :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

In Iran just this year a high rise building collapsed because of fire..

Tehran fire causes building collapse on TV - CNN Video


Oh look yet another Trump supporter who is also a conspiracy nutter.. Oh my I was right again..


Conclusion: you're a fucking moron...

There have been multiple investigations into the events of that day, by multiple orgs, which include, "truly scientific and impartial investigations" as well as other wise.

Nut cases will never be convinced of anything other than their nutty views on the matter and that is one of the things that make them nuts.

What is said on that image has been debunked but I am pretty sure that you know that and do not care.

Hey who cares if they are lying they have a picture with liar written on it.. So much better!!!


Honestly, it's simply amazing in this date in time that so many fools are so stupid they can't educate themselves. Sometimes I think the internet is the worst thing to happen to the world. It has allowed fools to breed like rabbits..

If you believe they went to the moon in the 1960s with Thunderbirds strings and some grannies making their spacesuits, yet top tech country Japan can't go till 2030, then there's no point in trying to influence you on what you believe happened on 9/11

Physic professors are right nut job these days

Are you another paid govenment shill like Crockett?

why don´t you go and do the job ?
are you afraid to end up in the funny farm?

Different type of collapse, building wasn't steel. Are you deliberately trying to mislead people or just new to this topic?

I could have gone on to be a Maths professor myself, but it looked rather boring

Are you deliberately trying to be this dumb?

Hey GFY, This is not political. It's about physics.

There was a loud boom, then top of the building / the penthouse imploded first, then the building collapsed in a perfect freefall. Classic example of a controlled demolition. This is simple 9th grade physics, but I guess some people just aren't too bright. :1orglaugh

:pimp

This is what most people don't get. They look at the video and they see what looks like a perfectly normal building falling for no reason. They fail to understand the amount of damage the building took.

If this was a demo job that was set off intentionally.... Wouldn't they have done it at the same exact time as one of the towers?

it just proves us that you are the same morons in physics as you are in politics.

if someone does not understand one thing it is called "not talented" if someone does not understand nothing it is broadly called STUPID.

so if you (asspimp and ihatemyself) have any talent - please let us know. we still have hope.