![]() |
Another nail in the coffin for OpenSource
haha, this is great.
Key points: The U.S. military's research agency cut off grant money for helping to develop a secure, free operating system after a top programmer made anti-war statements to a major newspaper. DARPA, which oversees research activities for the Pentagon, is best known for developing the network that evolved into the Internet. The $2.3 million grant had funded security improvements to the OpenBSD operating system since 2001 as well as related projects. http://www.salon.com/tech/wire/2003/...rpa/index.html The U.S. military's research agency cut off grant money for helping to develop a secure, free operating system after a top programmer made anti-war statements to a major newspaper. The U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency halted the contract less than two weeks after The Globe and Mail of Toronto published a story in which programmer Theo de Raadt was quoted as saying he was "uncomfortable" about the funding source. "I try to convince myself that our grant means a half of a cruise missile doesn't get built," de Raadt told the newspaper. Within a few days, de Raadt said he received an e-mail from Jonathan Smith, a computer science professor at the University of Pennsylvania and the grant's lead researcher, expressing discomfort over the statements. On Thursday, Smith notified de Raadt of the cancellation. "A tenured professor was telling me not to exercise my freedom of speech," de Raadt said. Smith declined to comment on the matter, and DARPA did not return telephone messages Friday. De Raadt's suspicions about the cancellation could not be confirmed. The $2.3 million grant had funded security improvements to the OpenBSD operating system since 2001 as well as related projects. OpenBSD, a variation of Unix designed for use on servers, is touted as so secure that its default installation has had only one bug in the past seven years. Thousands of copies of OpenBSD have been downloaded in the past six months. It's not clear, however, how many are in use. De Raadt estimates about 85 percent of the DARPA grant has been spent, with about $1 million being used to pay for OpenBSD developers. Much of the work has been handled by a team of 80 unpaid volunteers. Another $500,000 of the money funded the work of United Kingdom-based researchers on a related project called OpenSSL, which is used to encrypt data. DARPA, which oversees research activities for the Pentagon, is best known for developing the network that evolved into the Internet. |
dont bite the hand that feeds
|
Quote:
I like sticking with companies and software that actually turn profit and will be around for decades to come. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Yep..
Free speech. Its great . |
pretty fucking sad.
:thumbsup |
Quote:
Believe it or not, it contributes to innovation. |
Quote:
SpaceAce |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
:1orglaugh Gentlemen, get your scanners ready. |
Quote:
Apache Linux StarOffice/OpenOffice PostgreSQL PERL Next. SpaceAce |
Quote:
|
Ealabs.com is running Microsoft-IIS/5.0 on Windows 2000
Does MS still give out one of these with purchase?.... http://i.xanga.com/sillypearly/vaseline.jpeg :winkwink: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
no but you have. :glugglug |
most programmers are stupid
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Cool... Did you use EANet to figure that out? http://ealabs.com/studio/services/xm...net/eanet.asmx :) You guys are way too easy to get going... :winkwink: |
Quote:
I have no control over that server, and I never keep anything on that box that I would not want the entire world to see. :winkwink: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
SpaceAce |
Freedom of speech my ass.. the guy didn't appreciate his $2.3 million funding, so fuck him. He didn't deserve it. Maybe someone who will appreciate it more can find it useful.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
He had free speech. He said what he wanted didn't he ? He isn't killed or in jail or anything is he ? No. He just doesn't get the money because didn't seem to appreciate it. I wouldn't give it to him either.
|
Quote:
This is not an issue of free speech. None of his rights have been violated. He is allowed to say what he wants; no one is stopping him. However, if the military has xx dollars to give out in grants, are they going to give it to someone who criticizes them? How many people do you think would love to have that research money? Lots, I am betting. So, they give it to someone who supports them. Seems pretty simple to me. SpaceAce |
Quote:
SpaceAce |
If the military was supporting it, it wasn't open source...
|
Quote:
the military then came along and removed that "dirty, cheap and tawdry" feeling. now all those other people won't have to worry about feeling "icky" either. that just sounds like that old "consequences of ones actions" thing in action ... |
Quote:
I have a friend with a wife that always bitches and nags him about how immoral and wrong it is to be using his domain name for porn. How much she wants him to go to church and that he's going to hell. You know how this story goes already I bet. You can guess how fast she can't wait to deposit that money and spend it as soon as it comes in. |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:31 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123